
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
Popular choices:

Radeon RX 6800
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
2023Why buy it
- ✅Costs $180 less on MSRP ($399 MSRP vs $579 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 49% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 56.8 vs 38.1 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $579 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution (2023).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 160W instead of 250W, a 90W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon RX 6800 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
Radeon RX 6800
2020Why buy it
- ✅1.4% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 8 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR 3 (2023) instead.
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌45.1% HIGHER MSRP$579 MSRPvs$399 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 38.1 vs 56.8 G3D/$ ($579 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
- ❌56.3% higher power demand at 250W vs 160W.
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
2023Radeon RX 6800
2020Why buy it
- ✅Costs $180 less on MSRP ($399 MSRP vs $579 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 49% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 56.8 vs 38.1 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $579 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution (2023).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 160W instead of 250W, a 90W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅1.4% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 8 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon RX 6800 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
Trade-offs
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR 3 (2023) instead.
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌45.1% HIGHER MSRP$579 MSRPvs$399 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 38.1 vs 56.8 G3D/$ ($579 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
- ❌56.3% higher power demand at 250W vs 160W.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 4060 Ti better than Radeon RX 6800?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon RX 6800 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Radeon RX 6800 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 177 FPS | 221 FPS |
| medium | 162 FPS | 203 FPS |
| high | 142 FPS | 178 FPS |
| ultra | 124 FPS | 161 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 143 FPS | 200 FPS |
| medium | 118 FPS | 167 FPS |
| high | 101 FPS | 138 FPS |
| ultra | 93 FPS | 129 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 93 FPS | 135 FPS |
| medium | 79 FPS | 114 FPS |
| high | 66 FPS | 90 FPS |
| ultra | 59 FPS | 83 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Radeon RX 6800 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 433 FPS | 508 FPS |
| medium | 363 FPS | 436 FPS |
| high | 294 FPS | 346 FPS |
| ultra | 240 FPS | 295 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 278 FPS | 338 FPS |
| medium | 238 FPS | 283 FPS |
| high | 194 FPS | 231 FPS |
| ultra | 161 FPS | 189 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 123 FPS | 144 FPS |
| medium | 102 FPS | 124 FPS |
| high | 84 FPS | 105 FPS |
| ultra | 65 FPS | 84 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Radeon RX 6800 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 855 FPS | 901 FPS |
| medium | 693 FPS | 734 FPS |
| high | 609 FPS | 637 FPS |
| ultra | 510 FPS | 496 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 660 FPS | 691 FPS |
| medium | 527 FPS | 557 FPS |
| high | 452 FPS | 471 FPS |
| ultra | 382 FPS | 372 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 447 FPS | 482 FPS |
| medium | 355 FPS | 391 FPS |
| high | 308 FPS | 324 FPS |
| ultra | 255 FPS | 248 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Radeon RX 6800 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 775 FPS | 641 FPS |
| medium | 639 FPS | 547 FPS |
| high | 558 FPS | 481 FPS |
| ultra | 492 FPS | 434 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 613 FPS | 536 FPS |
| medium | 503 FPS | 462 FPS |
| high | 435 FPS | 395 FPS |
| ultra | 378 FPS | 349 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 375 FPS | 343 FPS |
| medium | 322 FPS | 306 FPS |
| high | 298 FPS | 276 FPS |
| ultra | 255 FPS | 243 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4060 Ti and Radeon RX 6800

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2535 MHz. It has 4352 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 34 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,651 points. Launch price was $399.

Radeon RX 6800
Radeon RX 6800
The Radeon RX 6800 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 28 2020. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1700 MHz to 2105 MHz. It has 3840 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 60 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,056 points. Launch price was $579.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti scores 22,651 and the Radeon RX 6800 reaches 22,056 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is built on Ada Lovelace while the Radeon RX 6800 uses RDNA 2.0, both on 5 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 4,352 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 3,840 (Radeon RX 6800). Raw compute: 22.06 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 16.17 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 6800). Boost clocks: 2535 MHz vs 2105 MHz. Ray tracing: 34 RT cores (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 60 (Radeon RX 6800) with 136 Tensor cores.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Radeon RX 6800 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 22,651+3% | 22,056 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | RDNA 2.0 |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 4352+13% | 3840 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 22.06 TFLOPS+36% | 16.17 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2535 MHz+20% | 2105 MHz |
| ROPs | 48 | 96+100% |
| TMUs | 136 | 240+76% |
| L1 Cache | 4.3 MB+473% | 0.75 MB |
| L2 Cache | 32 MB+700% | 4 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 34 | 60+76% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
Both GPUs support Frame Generation technologies, but they achieve it differently. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti uses DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation, while the Radeon RX 6800 relies on FSR Frame Generation + AFMF. Both can significantly boost FPS in supported titles, but they are not on the same feature stack.The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon RX 6800 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Radeon RX 6800 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution | FSR 3 |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation | FSR Frame Generation + AFMF |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 6800 has 16 GB. The Radeon RX 6800 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 288 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 512 GB/s (Radeon RX 6800) — a 77.8% advantage for the Radeon RX 6800. Bus width: 128-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 32 MB (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 4 MB (Radeon RX 6800) — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Radeon RX 6800 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 16 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 288 GB/s | 512 GB/s+78% |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 256-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 32 MB+700% | 4 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 12.2 (Radeon RX 6800). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Radeon RX 6800 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs VCN 4.0 (Radeon RX 6800). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs VCN 4.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon RX 6800).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Radeon RX 6800 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 8th Gen NVENC | VCN 4.0 |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | VCN 4.0 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti draws 160W versus the Radeon RX 6800's 250W — a 43.9% difference. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 650W (Radeon RX 6800). Power connectors: 8-pin vs 2x 8-pin. Card length: 240mm vs 240mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Radeon RX 6800 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 160W-36% | 250W |
| Recommended PSU | 550W-15% | 650W |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | 2x 8-pin |
| Length | 240mm | 240mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C-7% | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 141.6+61% | 88.2 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti launched at $399 MSRP, while the Radeon RX 6800 launched at $579. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti costs 31.1% less ($180 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 56.8 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 38.1 (Radeon RX 6800) — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti offers 49.1% better value. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2020).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Radeon RX 6800 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $399-31% | $579 |
| Performance per Dollar | 56.8+49% | 38.1 |
| Codename | AD106 | Navi 21 |
| Release | May 18 2023 | October 28 2020 |
| Ranking | #59 | #65 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












