
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
Popular choices:

Radeon RX 6750 XT
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
2023Why buy it
- ✅16.3% more average FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $150 less on MSRP ($399 MSRP vs $549 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 50.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 56.8 vs 37.7 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $549 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution (2023).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
Radeon RX 6750 XT
2022Why buy it
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 8 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4060 Ti across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR 3 (2023) instead.
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌37.6% HIGHER MSRP$549 MSRPvs$399 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 37.7 vs 56.8 G3D/$ ($549 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
2023Radeon RX 6750 XT
2022Why buy it
- ✅16.3% more average FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $150 less on MSRP ($399 MSRP vs $549 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 50.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 56.8 vs 37.7 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $549 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution (2023).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 8 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4060 Ti across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR 3 (2023) instead.
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌37.6% HIGHER MSRP$549 MSRPvs$399 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 37.7 vs 56.8 G3D/$ ($549 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 4060 Ti better than Radeon RX 6750 XT?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon RX 6750 XT still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Radeon RX 6750 XT |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 177 FPS | 175 FPS |
| medium | 162 FPS | 155 FPS |
| high | 142 FPS | 142 FPS |
| ultra | 124 FPS | 120 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 143 FPS | 145 FPS |
| medium | 118 FPS | 117 FPS |
| high | 101 FPS | 108 FPS |
| ultra | 93 FPS | 97 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 93 FPS | 87 FPS |
| medium | 79 FPS | 73 FPS |
| high | 66 FPS | 60 FPS |
| ultra | 59 FPS | 52 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Radeon RX 6750 XT |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 425 FPS | 475 FPS |
| medium | 359 FPS | 404 FPS |
| high | 292 FPS | 326 FPS |
| ultra | 237 FPS | 274 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 270 FPS | 298 FPS |
| medium | 229 FPS | 247 FPS |
| high | 186 FPS | 207 FPS |
| ultra | 154 FPS | 174 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 117 FPS | 131 FPS |
| medium | 95 FPS | 112 FPS |
| high | 77 FPS | 92 FPS |
| ultra | 60 FPS | 70 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Radeon RX 6750 XT |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 855 FPS | 867 FPS |
| medium | 693 FPS | 705 FPS |
| high | 609 FPS | 621 FPS |
| ultra | 510 FPS | 465 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 660 FPS | 663 FPS |
| medium | 527 FPS | 532 FPS |
| high | 452 FPS | 459 FPS |
| ultra | 382 FPS | 349 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 447 FPS | 454 FPS |
| medium | 355 FPS | 363 FPS |
| high | 308 FPS | 310 FPS |
| ultra | 255 FPS | 233 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Radeon RX 6750 XT |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 775 FPS | 706 FPS |
| medium | 639 FPS | 587 FPS |
| high | 558 FPS | 493 FPS |
| ultra | 492 FPS | 414 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 613 FPS | 542 FPS |
| medium | 503 FPS | 453 FPS |
| high | 435 FPS | 368 FPS |
| ultra | 378 FPS | 310 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 375 FPS | 323 FPS |
| medium | 322 FPS | 286 FPS |
| high | 298 FPS | 258 FPS |
| ultra | 255 FPS | 211 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4060 Ti and Radeon RX 6750 XT

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2535 MHz. It has 4352 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 34 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,651 points. Launch price was $399.

Radeon RX 6750 XT
Radeon RX 6750 XT
The Radeon RX 6750 XT is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 3 2022. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2150 MHz to 2600 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 40 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 20,686 points. Launch price was $549.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti scores 22,651 versus the Radeon RX 6750 XT's 20,686 — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti leads by 9.5%. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is built on Ada Lovelace while the Radeon RX 6750 XT uses RDNA 2.0, both on 5 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 4,352 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 2,560 (Radeon RX 6750 XT). Raw compute: 22.06 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 13.31 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 6750 XT). Boost clocks: 2535 MHz vs 2600 MHz. Ray tracing: 34 RT cores (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 40 (Radeon RX 6750 XT) with 136 Tensor cores.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Radeon RX 6750 XT |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 22,651+9% | 20,686 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | RDNA 2.0 |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 4352+70% | 2560 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 22.06 TFLOPS+66% | 13.31 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2535 MHz | 2600 MHz+3% |
| ROPs | 48 | 64+33% |
| TMUs | 136 | 160+18% |
| L1 Cache | 4.3 MB+760% | 0.5 MB |
| L2 Cache | 32 MB+967% | 3 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 34 | 40+18% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
Both GPUs support Frame Generation technologies, but they achieve it differently. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti uses DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation, while the Radeon RX 6750 XT relies on FSR Frame Generation + AFMF. Both can significantly boost FPS in supported titles, but they are not on the same feature stack.The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon RX 6750 XT relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Radeon RX 6750 XT |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution | FSR 3 |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation | FSR Frame Generation + AFMF |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 6750 XT has 12 GB. The Radeon RX 6750 XT offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 288 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 432 GB/s (Radeon RX 6750 XT) — a 50% advantage for the Radeon RX 6750 XT. Bus width: 128-bit vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 32 MB (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 3 MB (Radeon RX 6750 XT) — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Radeon RX 6750 XT |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 12 GB+50% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 288 GB/s | 432 GB/s+50% |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 192-bit+50% |
| L2 Cache | 32 MB+967% | 3 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 12 Ultimate (Radeon RX 6750 XT). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Radeon RX 6750 XT |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2+2% | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs VCN 3.0 (Radeon RX 6750 XT). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs VCN 3.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only),VP9 (Radeon RX 6750 XT).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Radeon RX 6750 XT |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 8th Gen NVENC | VCN 3.0 |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | VCN 3.0 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only),VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti draws 160W versus the Radeon RX 6750 XT's 250W — a 43.9% difference. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 650W (Radeon RX 6750 XT). Power connectors: 8-pin vs 6-pin + 8-pin. Card length: 240mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Radeon RX 6750 XT |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 160W-36% | 250W |
| Recommended PSU | 550W-15% | 650W |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | 6-pin + 8-pin |
| Length | 240mm | 267mm |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C-13% | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 141.6+71% | 82.7 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti launched at $399 MSRP, while the Radeon RX 6750 XT launched at $549. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti costs 27.3% less ($150 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 56.8 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 37.7 (Radeon RX 6750 XT) — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti offers 50.7% better value. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2022).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Radeon RX 6750 XT |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $399-27% | $549 |
| Performance per Dollar | 56.8+51% | 37.7 |
| Codename | AD106 | Navi 22 |
| Release | May 18 2023 | March 3 2022 |
| Ranking | #59 | #70 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












