G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti

2023

Why buy it

✅+12.7% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅Access to DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution (2023).
✅Draws 160W instead of 250W, a 90W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌
38.1% HIGHER MSRP
$399 MSRPvs$289 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 56.8 vs 69.5 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $289 MSRP).

Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12GB

2023

Why buy it

✅Costs $110 less on MSRP ($289 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
✅Delivers 22.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 69.5 vs 56.8 G3D/$ ($289 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 8 GB).

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (20,096 vs 22,651).
❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR 3 (2023) instead.
❌56.3% higher power demand at 250W vs 160W.

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti

2023

Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12GB

2023

Why buy it

✅+12.7% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅Access to DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution (2023).
✅Draws 160W instead of 250W, a 90W reduction.

Why buy it

✅Costs $110 less on MSRP ($289 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
✅Delivers 22.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 69.5 vs 56.8 G3D/$ ($289 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 8 GB).

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌
38.1% HIGHER MSRP
$399 MSRPvs$289 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 56.8 vs 69.5 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $289 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (20,096 vs 22,651).
❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR 3 (2023) instead.
❌56.3% higher power demand at 250W vs 160W.

Quick Answers

So, is GeForce RTX 4060 Ti better than Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12GB?

Yes. GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the better GPU overall here. You are getting 12.7% higher PassMark G3D performance and DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting 12.7% more raw performance headroom, the stronger feature stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation instead of FSR 3 + AFMF, and a 5nm process instead of 7nm. That broader feature stack should age better as more games lean on modern upscaling and frame-generation support.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is about 38.1% more expensive on MSRP at $399 MSRP versus $289 MSRP, and you are getting 12.7% higher G3D Mark. Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12GB still holds the G3D-per-dollar lead, so the performance win comes with a real value premium. If you are comfortable paying the premium for the stronger gaming result, GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the one to buy. If staying closer to budget matters more, Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12GB still makes more sense on price alone and remains capable enough for modern gaming.

Is Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12GB still worth buying for gaming in 2026?

Yes. Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12GB is still a strong gaming GPU in 2026: it is excellent for 1080p, very strong for 1440p, and still capable at 4K with sensible settings or upscaling. This mostly comes down to price. If you want to stay closer to $289 MSRP, it remains a strong choice; if you are comfortable paying more, GeForce RTX 4060 Ti earns that extra money with a clearly stronger gaming result and a more complete overall package.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti Benchmark Check

Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12GB Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12GB
1080p
low	177 FPS	220 FPS
medium	162 FPS	201 FPS
high	142 FPS	181 FPS
ultra	124 FPS	139 FPS
1440p
low	143 FPS	180 FPS
medium	118 FPS	147 FPS
high	101 FPS	133 FPS
ultra	93 FPS	108 FPS
4K
low	93 FPS	93 FPS
medium	79 FPS	78 FPS
high	66 FPS	64 FPS
ultra	59 FPS	55 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4060 Ti Open Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12GB

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12GB
1080p
low	425 FPS	481 FPS
medium	359 FPS	406 FPS
high	292 FPS	328 FPS
ultra	237 FPS	277 FPS
1440p
low	270 FPS	295 FPS
medium	229 FPS	239 FPS
high	186 FPS	199 FPS
ultra	154 FPS	168 FPS
4K
low	117 FPS	128 FPS
medium	95 FPS	107 FPS
high	77 FPS	86 FPS
ultra	60 FPS	66 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4060 Ti Open Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12GB

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12GB
1080p
low	855 FPS	904 FPS
medium	693 FPS	723 FPS
high	609 FPS	603 FPS
ultra	510 FPS	452 FPS
1440p
low	660 FPS	678 FPS
medium	527 FPS	543 FPS
high	452 FPS	452 FPS
ultra	382 FPS	339 FPS
4K
low	447 FPS	452 FPS
medium	355 FPS	362 FPS
high	308 FPS	301 FPS
ultra	255 FPS	226 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4060 Ti Open Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12GB

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12GB
1080p
low	775 FPS	768 FPS
medium	639 FPS	642 FPS
high	558 FPS	532 FPS
ultra	492 FPS	445 FPS
1440p
low	613 FPS	579 FPS
medium	503 FPS	487 FPS
high	435 FPS	392 FPS
ultra	378 FPS	328 FPS
4K
low	375 FPS	346 FPS
medium	322 FPS	308 FPS
high	298 FPS	275 FPS
ultra	255 FPS	224 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4060 Ti Open Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12GB

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4060 Ti and Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12GB

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti

The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2535 MHz. It has 4352 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 34 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,651 points. Launch price was $399.

Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12GB

The Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12GB is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 17 2023. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2321 MHz to 2581 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 40 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 20,096 points. Launch price was $334.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti scores 22,651 versus the Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12GB's 20,096 — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti leads by 12.7%. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is built on Ada Lovelace while the Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12GB uses RDNA 2.0, both on 5 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 4,352 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 2,560 (Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12GB). Raw compute: 22.06 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 13.21 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12GB). Boost clocks: 2535 MHz vs 2581 MHz. Ray tracing: 34 RT cores (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 40 (Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12GB) with 136 Tensor cores.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12GB
G3D Mark Score	22,651+13%	20,096
Architecture	Ada Lovelace	RDNA 2.0
Process Node	5 nm	7 nm
Shading Units	4352+70%	2560
Compute (TFLOPS)	22.06 TFLOPS+67%	13.21 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	2535 MHz	2581 MHz+2%
ROPs	48	64+33%
TMUs	136	160+18%
L1 Cache	4.3 MB+760%	0.5 MB
L2 Cache	32 MB+967%	3 MB
Ray Tracing Cores	34	40+18%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Both GPUs support Frame Generation technologies, but they achieve it differently. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti uses DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation, while the Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12GB relies on FSR Frame Generation + AFMF. Both can significantly boost FPS in supported titles, but they are not on the same feature stack.The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12GB relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12GB
Upscaling Tech	DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution	FSR 3
Frame Generation	DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation	FSR Frame Generation + AFMF
Ray Reconstruction	Yes (DLSS 3.5)	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12GB has 12 GB. The Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12GB offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 288 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 384 GB/s (Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12GB) — a 33.3% advantage for the Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12GB. Bus width: 128-bit vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 32 MB (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 3 MB (Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12GB) — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12GB
VRAM Capacity	8 GB	12 GB+50%
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Memory Bandwidth	288 GB/s	384 GB/s+33%
Bus Width	128-bit	192-bit+50%
L2 Cache	32 MB+967%	3 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 12.2 (Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12GB). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12GB
DirectX	12.2	12.2
Vulkan	1.3	1.3
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs VCN 4.0 (Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12GB). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs VCN 4.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12GB).

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12GB
Encoder	8th Gen NVENC	VCN 4.0
Decoder	5th Gen NVDEC	VCN 4.0
Codecs	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti draws 160W versus the Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12GB's 250W — a 43.9% difference. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 600W (Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12GB). Power connectors: 8-pin vs 8-pin. Card length: 240mm vs 240mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 75°C.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12GB
TDP	160W-36%	250W
Recommended PSU	550W-8%	600W
Power Connector	8-pin	8-pin
Length	240mm	240mm
Height	111mm	111mm
Slots	2	2
Temp (Load)	70°C-7%	75°C
Perf/Watt	141.6+76%	80.4

💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti launched at $399 MSRP, while the Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12GB launched at $289. The Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12GB costs 27.6% less ($110 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 56.8 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 69.5 (Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12GB) — the Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12GB offers 22.4% better value.