
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
Popular choices:

Radeon RX 6700
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
2023Why buy it
- ✅22.6% more average FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 13.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 56.8 vs 49.9 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $379 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution (2023).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Measures 240mm instead of 267mm, a 27mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 10 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
Radeon RX 6700
2021Why buy it
- ✅Costs $20 less on MSRP ($379 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
- ✅25% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (10 GB vs 8 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4060 Ti across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR 3 (2023) instead.
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 49.9 vs 56.8 G3D/$ ($379 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
- ❌11.3% longer card at 267mm vs 240mm.
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
2023Radeon RX 6700
2021Why buy it
- ✅22.6% more average FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 13.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 56.8 vs 49.9 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $379 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution (2023).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Measures 240mm instead of 267mm, a 27mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $20 less on MSRP ($379 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
- ✅25% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (10 GB vs 8 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 10 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4060 Ti across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR 3 (2023) instead.
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 49.9 vs 56.8 G3D/$ ($379 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
- ❌11.3% longer card at 267mm vs 240mm.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 4060 Ti better than Radeon RX 6700?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon RX 6700 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Radeon RX 6700 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 177 FPS | 168 FPS |
| medium | 162 FPS | 150 FPS |
| high | 142 FPS | 132 FPS |
| ultra | 124 FPS | 111 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 143 FPS | 140 FPS |
| medium | 118 FPS | 113 FPS |
| high | 101 FPS | 101 FPS |
| ultra | 93 FPS | 91 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 93 FPS | 86 FPS |
| medium | 79 FPS | 73 FPS |
| high | 66 FPS | 59 FPS |
| ultra | 59 FPS | 51 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Radeon RX 6700 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 425 FPS | 432 FPS |
| medium | 359 FPS | 357 FPS |
| high | 292 FPS | 286 FPS |
| ultra | 237 FPS | 238 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 270 FPS | 271 FPS |
| medium | 229 FPS | 223 FPS |
| high | 186 FPS | 185 FPS |
| ultra | 154 FPS | 151 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 117 FPS | 126 FPS |
| medium | 95 FPS | 107 FPS |
| high | 77 FPS | 87 FPS |
| ultra | 60 FPS | 66 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Radeon RX 6700 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 855 FPS | 844 FPS |
| medium | 693 FPS | 681 FPS |
| high | 609 FPS | 568 FPS |
| ultra | 510 FPS | 426 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 660 FPS | 639 FPS |
| medium | 527 FPS | 511 FPS |
| high | 452 FPS | 426 FPS |
| ultra | 382 FPS | 319 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 447 FPS | 426 FPS |
| medium | 355 FPS | 341 FPS |
| high | 308 FPS | 284 FPS |
| ultra | 255 FPS | 213 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Radeon RX 6700 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 775 FPS | 679 FPS |
| medium | 639 FPS | 564 FPS |
| high | 558 FPS | 474 FPS |
| ultra | 492 FPS | 402 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 613 FPS | 528 FPS |
| medium | 503 FPS | 440 FPS |
| high | 435 FPS | 358 FPS |
| ultra | 378 FPS | 301 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 375 FPS | 313 FPS |
| medium | 322 FPS | 277 FPS |
| high | 298 FPS | 250 FPS |
| ultra | 255 FPS | 206 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4060 Ti and Radeon RX 6700

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2535 MHz. It has 4352 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 34 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,651 points. Launch price was $399.

Radeon RX 6700
Radeon RX 6700
The Radeon RX 6700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 9 2021. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1941 MHz to 2450 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 175W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 36 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 18,920 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti scores 22,651 versus the Radeon RX 6700's 18,920 — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti leads by 19.7%. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is built on Ada Lovelace while the Radeon RX 6700 uses RDNA 2.0, both on 5 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 4,352 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 2,304 (Radeon RX 6700). Raw compute: 22.06 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 11.29 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 6700). Boost clocks: 2535 MHz vs 2450 MHz. Ray tracing: 34 RT cores (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 36 (Radeon RX 6700) with 136 Tensor cores.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Radeon RX 6700 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 22,651+20% | 18,920 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | RDNA 2.0 |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 4352+89% | 2304 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 22.06 TFLOPS+95% | 11.29 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2535 MHz+3% | 2450 MHz |
| ROPs | 48 | 64+33% |
| TMUs | 136 | 144+6% |
| L1 Cache | 4.3 MB+760% | 0.5 MB |
| L2 Cache | 32 MB+967% | 3 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 34 | 36+6% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
Both GPUs support Frame Generation technologies, but they achieve it differently. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti uses DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation, while the Radeon RX 6700 relies on FSR Frame Generation + AFMF. Both can significantly boost FPS in supported titles, but they are not on the same feature stack.The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon RX 6700 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Radeon RX 6700 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution | FSR 3 |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation | FSR Frame Generation + AFMF |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 6700 has 10 GB. The Radeon RX 6700 offers 25% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 288 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 320 GB/s (Radeon RX 6700) — a 11.1% advantage for the Radeon RX 6700. Bus width: 128-bit vs 160-bit. L2 Cache: 32 MB (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 3 MB (Radeon RX 6700) — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Radeon RX 6700 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 10 GB+25% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 288 GB/s | 320 GB/s+11% |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 160-bit+25% |
| L2 Cache | 32 MB+967% | 3 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 12 Ultimate (Radeon RX 6700). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Radeon RX 6700 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2+2% | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.4+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs VCE (Radeon RX 6700). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs UVD. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 (Radeon RX 6700).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Radeon RX 6700 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 8th Gen NVENC | VCE |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | UVD |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti draws 160W versus the Radeon RX 6700's 175W — a 9% difference. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 550W (Radeon RX 6700). Power connectors: 8-pin vs 8-pin. Card length: 240mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Radeon RX 6700 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 160W-9% | 175W |
| Recommended PSU | 550W | 550W |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | 8-pin |
| Length | 240mm | 267mm |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C-7% | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 141.6+31% | 108.1 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti launched at $399 MSRP, while the Radeon RX 6700 launched at $379. The Radeon RX 6700 costs 5% less ($20 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 56.8 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 49.9 (Radeon RX 6700) — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti offers 13.8% better value. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2021).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Radeon RX 6700 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $399 | $379-5% |
| Performance per Dollar | 56.8+14% | 49.9 |
| Codename | AD106 | Navi 22 |
| Release | May 18 2023 | June 9 2021 |
| Ranking | #59 | #90 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












