
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
Popular choices:

Radeon RX 6650M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
2023Why buy it
- ✅+49.3% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 56.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution (2023).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌33.3% higher power demand at 160W vs 120W.
Radeon RX 6650M
2022Why buy it
- ✅Draws 120W instead of 160W, a 40W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (15,171 vs 22,651).
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR 3 (2023) instead.
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 56.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
2023Radeon RX 6650M
2022Why buy it
- ✅+49.3% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 56.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution (2023).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 120W instead of 160W, a 40W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌33.3% higher power demand at 160W vs 120W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (15,171 vs 22,651).
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR 3 (2023) instead.
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 56.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 4060 Ti better than Radeon RX 6650M?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon RX 6650M still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Radeon RX 6650M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 177 FPS | 167 FPS |
| medium | 162 FPS | 148 FPS |
| high | 142 FPS | 131 FPS |
| ultra | 124 FPS | 111 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 143 FPS | 140 FPS |
| medium | 118 FPS | 113 FPS |
| high | 101 FPS | 101 FPS |
| ultra | 93 FPS | 91 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 93 FPS | 84 FPS |
| medium | 79 FPS | 71 FPS |
| high | 66 FPS | 58 FPS |
| ultra | 59 FPS | 50 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Radeon RX 6650M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 425 FPS | 306 FPS |
| medium | 359 FPS | 253 FPS |
| high | 292 FPS | 199 FPS |
| ultra | 237 FPS | 155 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 270 FPS | 193 FPS |
| medium | 229 FPS | 158 FPS |
| high | 186 FPS | 124 FPS |
| ultra | 154 FPS | 99 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 117 FPS | 103 FPS |
| medium | 95 FPS | 83 FPS |
| high | 77 FPS | 69 FPS |
| ultra | 60 FPS | 53 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Radeon RX 6650M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 855 FPS | 683 FPS |
| medium | 693 FPS | 546 FPS |
| high | 609 FPS | 455 FPS |
| ultra | 510 FPS | 341 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 660 FPS | 512 FPS |
| medium | 527 FPS | 410 FPS |
| high | 452 FPS | 341 FPS |
| ultra | 382 FPS | 256 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 447 FPS | 341 FPS |
| medium | 355 FPS | 273 FPS |
| high | 308 FPS | 228 FPS |
| ultra | 255 FPS | 171 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Radeon RX 6650M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 775 FPS | 505 FPS |
| medium | 639 FPS | 423 FPS |
| high | 558 FPS | 352 FPS |
| ultra | 492 FPS | 294 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 613 FPS | 389 FPS |
| medium | 503 FPS | 324 FPS |
| high | 435 FPS | 255 FPS |
| ultra | 378 FPS | 207 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 375 FPS | 224 FPS |
| medium | 322 FPS | 181 FPS |
| high | 298 FPS | 168 FPS |
| ultra | 255 FPS | 130 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4060 Ti and Radeon RX 6650M

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2535 MHz. It has 4352 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 34 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,651 points. Launch price was $399.

Radeon RX 6650M
Radeon RX 6650M
The Radeon RX 6650M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 4 2022. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2068 MHz to 2416 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 120W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 15,171 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti scores 22,651 versus the Radeon RX 6650M's 15,171 — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti leads by 49.3%. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is built on Ada Lovelace while the Radeon RX 6650M uses RDNA 2.0, both on 5 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 4,352 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 1,792 (Radeon RX 6650M). Raw compute: 22.06 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 8.659 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 6650M). Boost clocks: 2535 MHz vs 2416 MHz. Ray tracing: 34 RT cores (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 28 (Radeon RX 6650M) with 136 Tensor cores.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Radeon RX 6650M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 22,651+49% | 15,171 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | RDNA 2.0 |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 4352+143% | 1792 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 22.06 TFLOPS+155% | 8.659 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2535 MHz+5% | 2416 MHz |
| ROPs | 48 | 64+33% |
| TMUs | 136+21% | 112 |
| L1 Cache | 4.3 MB+760% | 0.5 MB |
| L2 Cache | 32 MB+1500% | 2 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 34+21% | 28 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
Both GPUs support Frame Generation technologies, but they achieve it differently. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti uses DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation, while the Radeon RX 6650M relies on FSR Frame Generation + AFMF. Both can significantly boost FPS in supported titles, but they are not on the same feature stack.The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon RX 6650M relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Radeon RX 6650M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution | FSR 3 |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation | FSR Frame Generation + AFMF |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 8 GB of GDDR6. Memory bandwidth: 288 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 224 GB/s (Radeon RX 6650M) — a 28.6% advantage for the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 32 MB (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 2 MB (Radeon RX 6650M) — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Radeon RX 6650M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 288 GB/s+29% | 224 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 32 MB+1500% | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 12.2 (Radeon RX 6650M). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 1.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Radeon RX 6650M |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.4+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4+300% | 1 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs VCN 3.0 (Radeon RX 6650M). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs VCN 3.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon RX 6650M).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Radeon RX 6650M |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 8th Gen NVENC | VCN 3.0 |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | VCN 3.0 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti draws 160W versus the Radeon RX 6650M's 120W — a 28.6% difference. The Radeon RX 6650M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 650W (Radeon RX 6650M). Power connectors: 8-pin vs Mobile. Card length: 240mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Radeon RX 6650M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 160W | 120W-25% |
| Recommended PSU | 550W-15% | 650W |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | Mobile |
| Length | 240mm | 0mm |
| Height | 111mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C-13% | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 141.6+12% | 126.4 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2022).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Radeon RX 6650M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $399 | — |
| Codename | AD106 | Navi 23 |
| Release | May 18 2023 | January 4 2022 |
| Ranking | #59 | #148 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












