
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
Popular choices:

Radeon RX 6500
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
2023Why buy it
- ✅+197.6% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Delivers 48.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 56.8 vs 38.2 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution (2023).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌113.3% higher power demand at 160W vs 75W.
- ❌39.5% longer card at 240mm vs 172mm.
Radeon RX 6500
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $200 less on MSRP ($199 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 75W instead of 160W, a 85W reduction.
- ✅Measures 172mm instead of 240mm, a 68mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (7,610 vs 22,651).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR 3 (2023) instead.
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 38.2 vs 56.8 G3D/$ ($199 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
2023Radeon RX 6500
Why buy it
- ✅+197.6% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Delivers 48.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 56.8 vs 38.2 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution (2023).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $200 less on MSRP ($199 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 75W instead of 160W, a 85W reduction.
- ✅Measures 172mm instead of 240mm, a 68mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌113.3% higher power demand at 160W vs 75W.
- ❌39.5% longer card at 240mm vs 172mm.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (7,610 vs 22,651).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR 3 (2023) instead.
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 38.2 vs 56.8 G3D/$ ($199 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 4060 Ti better than Radeon RX 6500?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon RX 6500 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Radeon RX 6500 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 177 FPS | 78 FPS |
| medium | 162 FPS | 68 FPS |
| high | 142 FPS | 54 FPS |
| ultra | 124 FPS | 35 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 143 FPS | 71 FPS |
| medium | 118 FPS | 60 FPS |
| high | 101 FPS | 43 FPS |
| ultra | 93 FPS | 28 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 93 FPS | 25 FPS |
| medium | 79 FPS | 24 FPS |
| high | 66 FPS | 16 FPS |
| ultra | 59 FPS | 14 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Radeon RX 6500 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 425 FPS | 106 FPS |
| medium | 359 FPS | 73 FPS |
| high | 292 FPS | 49 FPS |
| ultra | 237 FPS | 33 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 270 FPS | 72 FPS |
| medium | 229 FPS | 44 FPS |
| high | 186 FPS | 32 FPS |
| ultra | 154 FPS | 23 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 117 FPS | 34 FPS |
| medium | 95 FPS | 23 FPS |
| high | 77 FPS | 18 FPS |
| ultra | 60 FPS | 13 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Radeon RX 6500 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 855 FPS | 299 FPS |
| medium | 693 FPS | 258 FPS |
| high | 609 FPS | 196 FPS |
| ultra | 510 FPS | 160 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 660 FPS | 221 FPS |
| medium | 527 FPS | 198 FPS |
| high | 452 FPS | 157 FPS |
| ultra | 382 FPS | 121 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 447 FPS | 135 FPS |
| medium | 355 FPS | 117 FPS |
| high | 308 FPS | 81 FPS |
| ultra | 255 FPS | 53 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Radeon RX 6500 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 775 FPS | 131 FPS |
| medium | 639 FPS | 107 FPS |
| high | 558 FPS | 91 FPS |
| ultra | 492 FPS | 77 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 613 FPS | 99 FPS |
| medium | 503 FPS | 82 FPS |
| high | 435 FPS | 71 FPS |
| ultra | 378 FPS | 58 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 375 FPS | 58 FPS |
| medium | 322 FPS | 47 FPS |
| high | 298 FPS | 37 FPS |
| ultra | 255 FPS | 29 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4060 Ti and Radeon RX 6500

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2535 MHz. It has 4352 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 34 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,651 points. Launch price was $399.

Radeon RX 6500
Radeon RX 6500
The Radeon RX 6500 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in sem dados. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,610 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti scores 22,651 versus the Radeon RX 6500's 7,610 — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti leads by 197.6%.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Radeon RX 6500 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 22,651+198% | 7,610 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
Both GPUs support Frame Generation technologies, but they achieve it differently. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti uses DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation, while the Radeon RX 6500 relies on FSR Frame Generation + AFMF. Both can significantly boost FPS in supported titles, but they are not on the same feature stack.The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon RX 6500 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Radeon RX 6500 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution | FSR 3 |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation | FSR Frame Generation + AFMF |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 6500 has 4 GB. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 288 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 144 GB/s (Radeon RX 6500) — a 100% advantage for the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Radeon RX 6500 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB+100% | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 288 GB/s+100% | 144 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 12.2 (Radeon RX 6500). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 2.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Radeon RX 6500 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4+100% | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs None (Radeon RX 6500). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs VCN 3.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon RX 6500).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Radeon RX 6500 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 8th Gen NVENC | None |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | VCN 3.0 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti draws 160W versus the Radeon RX 6500's 75W — a 72.3% difference. The Radeon RX 6500 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 400W (Radeon RX 6500). Power connectors: 8-pin vs 1x 6-pin. Card length: 240mm vs 172mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Radeon RX 6500 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 160W | 75W-53% |
| Recommended PSU | 550W | 400W-27% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | 240mm | 172mm |
| Height | 111mm | 112mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C-18% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 141.6+40% | 101.5 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti launched at $399 MSRP, while the Radeon RX 6500 launched at $199. The Radeon RX 6500 costs 50.1% less ($200 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 56.8 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 38.2 (Radeon RX 6500) — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti offers 48.7% better value.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Radeon RX 6500 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $399 | $199-50% |
| Performance per Dollar | 56.8+49% | 38.2 |
| Codename | AD106 | — |
| Release | May 18 2023 | sem dados |
| Ranking | #59 | #335 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












