
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
Popular choices:

Radeon RX 5600 OEM
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
2023Why buy it
- ✅97.2% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 56.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution (2023).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Measures 240mm instead of 241mm, a 1mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Radeon RX 5600 OEM
2020Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4060 Ti across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 56.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
2023Radeon RX 5600 OEM
2020Why buy it
- ✅97.2% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 56.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution (2023).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Measures 240mm instead of 241mm, a 1mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4060 Ti across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 56.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 4060 Ti better than Radeon RX 5600 OEM?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon RX 5600 OEM still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Radeon RX 5600 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 177 FPS | 119 FPS |
| medium | 162 FPS | 103 FPS |
| high | 142 FPS | 86 FPS |
| ultra | 124 FPS | 58 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 143 FPS | 99 FPS |
| medium | 118 FPS | 84 FPS |
| high | 101 FPS | 65 FPS |
| ultra | 93 FPS | 44 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 93 FPS | 41 FPS |
| medium | 79 FPS | 36 FPS |
| high | 66 FPS | 23 FPS |
| ultra | 59 FPS | 20 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Radeon RX 5600 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 433 FPS | 225 FPS |
| medium | 363 FPS | 193 FPS |
| high | 294 FPS | 141 FPS |
| ultra | 240 FPS | 104 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 278 FPS | 149 FPS |
| medium | 238 FPS | 125 FPS |
| high | 194 FPS | 94 FPS |
| ultra | 161 FPS | 69 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 123 FPS | 83 FPS |
| medium | 102 FPS | 70 FPS |
| high | 84 FPS | 56 FPS |
| ultra | 65 FPS | 39 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Radeon RX 5600 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 855 FPS | 555 FPS |
| medium | 693 FPS | 444 FPS |
| high | 609 FPS | 370 FPS |
| ultra | 510 FPS | 277 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 660 FPS | 416 FPS |
| medium | 527 FPS | 333 FPS |
| high | 452 FPS | 277 FPS |
| ultra | 382 FPS | 208 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 447 FPS | 277 FPS |
| medium | 355 FPS | 222 FPS |
| high | 308 FPS | 185 FPS |
| ultra | 255 FPS | 139 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Radeon RX 5600 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 775 FPS | 250 FPS |
| medium | 639 FPS | 217 FPS |
| high | 558 FPS | 179 FPS |
| ultra | 492 FPS | 149 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 613 FPS | 193 FPS |
| medium | 503 FPS | 172 FPS |
| high | 435 FPS | 136 FPS |
| ultra | 378 FPS | 111 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 375 FPS | 105 FPS |
| medium | 322 FPS | 88 FPS |
| high | 298 FPS | 71 FPS |
| ultra | 255 FPS | 56 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4060 Ti and Radeon RX 5600 OEM

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2535 MHz. It has 4352 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 34 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,651 points. Launch price was $399.

Radeon RX 5600 OEM
Radeon RX 5600 OEM
The Radeon RX 5600 OEM is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 21 2020. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1130 MHz to 1560 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,333 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti scores 22,651 versus the Radeon RX 5600 OEM's 12,333 — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti leads by 83.7%. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is built on Ada Lovelace while the Radeon RX 5600 OEM uses RDNA 1.0, both on 5 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 4,352 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 2,048 (Radeon RX 5600 OEM). Raw compute: 22.06 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 6.39 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 5600 OEM). Boost clocks: 2535 MHz vs 1560 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Radeon RX 5600 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 22,651+84% | 12,333 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | RDNA 1.0 |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 4352+113% | 2048 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 22.06 TFLOPS+245% | 6.39 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2535 MHz+63% | 1560 MHz |
| ROPs | 48 | 64+33% |
| TMUs | 136+6% | 128 |
| L2 Cache | 32 MB+967% | 3 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
Both GPUs support Frame Generation technologies, but they achieve it differently. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti uses DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation, while the Radeon RX 5600 OEM relies on FSR Frame Generation. Both can significantly boost FPS in supported titles, but they are not on the same feature stack.The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon RX 5600 OEM relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Radeon RX 5600 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation | FSR Frame Generation |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 8 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 128-bit vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 32 MB (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 3 MB (Radeon RX 5600 OEM) — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Radeon RX 5600 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 288 GB/s | 288 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 192-bit+50% |
| L2 Cache | 32 MB+967% | 3 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 12.1 (Radeon RX 5600 OEM). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Radeon RX 5600 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.3+8% | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs VCN 2.0 (Radeon RX 5600 OEM). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs VCN 2.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon RX 5600 OEM).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Radeon RX 5600 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 8th Gen NVENC | VCN 2.0 |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | VCN 2.0 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti draws 160W versus the Radeon RX 5600 OEM's 150W — a 6.5% difference. The Radeon RX 5600 OEM is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 500W (Radeon RX 5600 OEM). Power connectors: 8-pin vs 8-pin. Card length: 240mm vs 241mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Radeon RX 5600 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 160W | 150W-6% |
| Recommended PSU | 550W | 500W-9% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | 8-pin |
| Length | 240mm | 241mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C-13% | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 141.6+72% | 82.2 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2020).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Radeon RX 5600 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $399 | — |
| Codename | AD106 | Navi 10 |
| Release | May 18 2023 | January 21 2020 |
| Ranking | #59 | #216 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












