G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti

2023

Why buy it

✅54.0% more average FPS across 48 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Costs $30 less on MSRP ($399 MSRP vs $429 MSRP).
✅Delivers 83.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 56.8 vs 31.0 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $429 MSRP).
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌128.6% higher power demand at 160W vs 70W.
❌11.1% longer card at 240mm vs 216mm.

Radeon PRO W7500

2023

Why buy it

✅Draws 70W instead of 160W, a 90W reduction.
✅Measures 216mm instead of 240mm, a 24mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4060 Ti across 48 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
❌
7.5% HIGHER MSRP
$429 MSRPvs$399 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 31.0 vs 56.8 G3D/$ ($429 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti

2023

Radeon PRO W7500

2023

Why buy it

✅54.0% more average FPS across 48 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Costs $30 less on MSRP ($399 MSRP vs $429 MSRP).
✅Delivers 83.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 56.8 vs 31.0 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $429 MSRP).
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Why buy it

✅Draws 70W instead of 160W, a 90W reduction.
✅Measures 216mm instead of 240mm, a 24mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌128.6% higher power demand at 160W vs 70W.
❌11.1% longer card at 240mm vs 216mm.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4060 Ti across 48 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
❌
7.5% HIGHER MSRP
$429 MSRPvs$399 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 31.0 vs 56.8 G3D/$ ($429 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is GeForce RTX 4060 Ti better than Radeon PRO W7500?

Yes. GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the better GPU overall here. You are getting 54.0% more average FPS across 48 tracked games in our benchmark data, 70.3% higher PassMark G3D performance, and DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting 70.3% more raw performance headroom, better frame-generation support with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023) instead of FSR upscaling, and a 5nm process instead of 6nm. That broader feature stack should age better as more games lean on modern upscaling and frame-generation support.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the smarter buy today, but it is not as lopsided as a simple winner label makes it sound. GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is about $30 cheaper on MSRP at $399 MSRP versus $429 MSRP, and you are getting 54.0% more estimated average FPS across 48 tracked games in our benchmark data and 70.3% higher G3D Mark. It also leads G3D-per-dollar by 83.1%. That is why the better overall card still comes out as the smarter buy today, not just the faster one.

Is Radeon PRO W7500 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?

Yes. Radeon PRO W7500 is still a strong modern gaming GPU: it is very strong for 1080p, good for 1440p, and more limited at 4K. It remains a good buy when you can get it meaningfully cheaper than the alternative around $429 MSRP, even if GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is still the cleaner recommendation on overall value today.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti Benchmark Check

Radeon PRO W7500 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	Radeon PRO W7500
1080p
low	177 FPS	136 FPS
medium	162 FPS	119 FPS
high	142 FPS	104 FPS
ultra	124 FPS	85 FPS
1440p
low	143 FPS	122 FPS
medium	118 FPS	101 FPS
high	101 FPS	86 FPS
ultra	93 FPS	73 FPS
4K
low	93 FPS	66 FPS
medium	79 FPS	58 FPS
high	66 FPS	40 FPS
ultra	59 FPS	34 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4060 Ti Open Radeon PRO W7500

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	Radeon PRO W7500
1080p
low	425 FPS	339 FPS
medium	359 FPS	284 FPS
high	292 FPS	224 FPS
ultra	237 FPS	174 FPS
1440p
low	270 FPS	212 FPS
medium	229 FPS	179 FPS
high	186 FPS	142 FPS
ultra	154 FPS	114 FPS
4K
low	117 FPS	99 FPS
medium	95 FPS	83 FPS
high	77 FPS	69 FPS
ultra	60 FPS	53 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4060 Ti Open Radeon PRO W7500

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	Radeon PRO W7500
1080p
low	855 FPS	598 FPS
medium	693 FPS	479 FPS
high	609 FPS	399 FPS
ultra	510 FPS	299 FPS
1440p
low	660 FPS	414 FPS
medium	527 FPS	356 FPS
high	452 FPS	291 FPS
ultra	382 FPS	224 FPS
4K
low	447 FPS	299 FPS
medium	355 FPS	239 FPS
high	308 FPS	187 FPS
ultra	255 FPS	141 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4060 Ti Open Radeon PRO W7500

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	Radeon PRO W7500
1080p
low	775 FPS	522 FPS
medium	639 FPS	453 FPS
high	558 FPS	386 FPS
ultra	492 FPS	299 FPS
1440p
low	613 FPS	425 FPS
medium	503 FPS	359 FPS
high	435 FPS	298 FPS
ultra	378 FPS	224 FPS
4K
low	375 FPS	267 FPS
medium	322 FPS	239 FPS
high	298 FPS	199 FPS
ultra	255 FPS	150 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4060 Ti Open Radeon PRO W7500

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4060 Ti and Radeon PRO W7500

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti

The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2535 MHz. It has 4352 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 34 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,651 points. Launch price was $399.

Radeon PRO W7500

The Radeon PRO W7500 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 3 2023. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1500 MHz to 1700 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,298 points. Launch price was $429.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti scores 22,651 versus the Radeon PRO W7500's 13,298 — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti leads by 70.3%. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is built on Ada Lovelace while the Radeon PRO W7500 uses RDNA 3.0, both on 5 nm vs 6 nm. Shader units: 4,352 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 1,792 (Radeon PRO W7500). Raw compute: 22.06 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 12.19 TFLOPS (Radeon PRO W7500). Boost clocks: 2535 MHz vs 1700 MHz. Ray tracing: 34 RT cores (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 28 (Radeon PRO W7500) with 136 Tensor cores.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	Radeon PRO W7500
G3D Mark Score	22,651+70%	13,298
Architecture	Ada Lovelace	RDNA 3.0
Process Node	5 nm	6 nm
Shading Units	4352+143%	1792
Compute (TFLOPS)	22.06 TFLOPS+81%	12.19 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	2535 MHz+49%	1700 MHz
ROPs	48	64+33%
TMUs	136+21%	112
L1 Cache	4.3 MB+760%	0.5 MB
L2 Cache	32 MB+1500%	2 MB
Ray Tracing Cores	34+21%	28

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Radeon PRO W7500 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon PRO W7500 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	Radeon PRO W7500
Upscaling Tech	DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	Yes (DLSS 3.5)	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 8 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 128-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 32 MB (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 2 MB (Radeon PRO W7500) — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	Radeon PRO W7500
VRAM Capacity	8 GB	8 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Bus Width	128-bit	256-bit+100%
L2 Cache	32 MB+1500%	2 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 12.2 (Radeon PRO W7500). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	Radeon PRO W7500
DirectX	12.2	12.2
Vulkan	1.3	1.3
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs VCN 4.0 (Radeon PRO W7500). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs VCN 4.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon PRO W7500).

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	Radeon PRO W7500
Encoder	8th Gen NVENC	VCN 4.0
Decoder	5th Gen NVDEC	VCN 4.0
Codecs	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti draws 160W versus the Radeon PRO W7500's 70W — a 78.3% difference. The Radeon PRO W7500 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 500W (Radeon PRO W7500). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 240mm vs 216mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 75°C.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	Radeon PRO W7500
TDP	160W	70W-56%
Recommended PSU	550W	500W-9%
Power Connector	8-pin	PCIe-powered
Length	240mm	216mm
Height	111mm	115mm
Slots	2	1-50%
Temp (Load)	70°C-7%	75°C
Perf/Watt	141.6	190.0+34%

💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti launched at $399 MSRP, while the Radeon PRO W7500 launched at $429. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti costs 7% less ($30 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 56.8 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 31.0 (Radeon PRO W7500) — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti offers 83.2% better value.