
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
Popular choices:

Radeon Pro 5500M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
2023Why buy it
- ✅+236.6% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 56.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌88.2% higher power demand at 160W vs 85W.
Radeon Pro 5500M
2019Why buy it
- ✅Draws 85W instead of 160W, a 75W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (6,730 vs 22,651).
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 56.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
2023Radeon Pro 5500M
2019Why buy it
- ✅+236.6% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 56.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 85W instead of 160W, a 75W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌88.2% higher power demand at 160W vs 85W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (6,730 vs 22,651).
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 56.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 4060 Ti better than Radeon Pro 5500M?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon Pro 5500M still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Radeon Pro 5500M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 177 FPS | 129 FPS |
| medium | 162 FPS | 111 FPS |
| high | 142 FPS | 91 FPS |
| ultra | 124 FPS | 55 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 143 FPS | 114 FPS |
| medium | 118 FPS | 96 FPS |
| high | 101 FPS | 69 FPS |
| ultra | 93 FPS | 41 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 93 FPS | 41 FPS |
| medium | 79 FPS | 37 FPS |
| high | 66 FPS | 23 FPS |
| ultra | 59 FPS | 19 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Radeon Pro 5500M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 425 FPS | 126 FPS |
| medium | 359 FPS | 91 FPS |
| high | 292 FPS | 62 FPS |
| ultra | 237 FPS | 43 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 270 FPS | 84 FPS |
| medium | 229 FPS | 52 FPS |
| high | 186 FPS | 38 FPS |
| ultra | 154 FPS | 28 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 117 FPS | 40 FPS |
| medium | 95 FPS | 28 FPS |
| high | 77 FPS | 22 FPS |
| ultra | 60 FPS | 16 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Radeon Pro 5500M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 855 FPS | 303 FPS |
| medium | 693 FPS | 242 FPS |
| high | 609 FPS | 202 FPS |
| ultra | 510 FPS | 151 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 660 FPS | 227 FPS |
| medium | 527 FPS | 182 FPS |
| high | 452 FPS | 151 FPS |
| ultra | 382 FPS | 114 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 447 FPS | 151 FPS |
| medium | 355 FPS | 121 FPS |
| high | 308 FPS | 101 FPS |
| ultra | 255 FPS | 76 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Radeon Pro 5500M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 775 FPS | 263 FPS |
| medium | 639 FPS | 230 FPS |
| high | 558 FPS | 195 FPS |
| ultra | 492 FPS | 151 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 613 FPS | 197 FPS |
| medium | 503 FPS | 175 FPS |
| high | 435 FPS | 143 FPS |
| ultra | 378 FPS | 109 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 375 FPS | 107 FPS |
| medium | 322 FPS | 88 FPS |
| high | 298 FPS | 73 FPS |
| ultra | 255 FPS | 56 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4060 Ti and Radeon Pro 5500M

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2535 MHz. It has 4352 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 34 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,651 points. Launch price was $399.

Radeon Pro 5500M
Radeon Pro 5500M
The Radeon Pro 5500M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 13 2019. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1450 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 85W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,730 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti scores 22,651 versus the Radeon Pro 5500M's 6,730 — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti leads by 236.6%. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is built on Ada Lovelace while the Radeon Pro 5500M uses RDNA 1.0, both on 5 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 4,352 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 1,536 (Radeon Pro 5500M). Raw compute: 22.06 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 4.454 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro 5500M). Boost clocks: 2535 MHz vs 1450 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Radeon Pro 5500M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 22,651+237% | 6,730 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | RDNA 1.0 |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 4352+183% | 1536 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 22.06 TFLOPS+395% | 4.454 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2535 MHz+75% | 1450 MHz |
| ROPs | 48+50% | 32 |
| TMUs | 136+42% | 96 |
| L2 Cache | 32 MB+1500% | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Radeon Pro 5500M lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon Pro 5500M relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Radeon Pro 5500M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 8 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 32 MB (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 2 MB (Radeon Pro 5500M) — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Radeon Pro 5500M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 32 MB+1500% | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 12 (12_1) (Radeon Pro 5500M). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Radeon Pro 5500M |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2+2% | 12 (12_1) |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs VCN 2.0 (Radeon Pro 5500M). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs VCN 2.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs H.264,H.265,VP9 (Radeon Pro 5500M).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Radeon Pro 5500M |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 8th Gen NVENC | VCN 2.0 |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | VCN 2.0 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | H.264,H.265,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti draws 160W versus the Radeon Pro 5500M's 85W — a 61.2% difference. The Radeon Pro 5500M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 350W (Radeon Pro 5500M). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 240mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 85.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Radeon Pro 5500M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 160W | 85W-47% |
| Recommended PSU | 550W | 350W-36% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 240mm | 0mm |
| Height | 111mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C-18% | 85 |
| Perf/Watt | 141.6+79% | 79.2 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2019).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Radeon Pro 5500M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $399 | — |
| Codename | AD106 | Navi 14 |
| Release | May 18 2023 | November 13 2019 |
| Ranking | #59 | #363 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












