
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
Popular choices:

Intel Arc Pro B50
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
2023Why buy it
- ✅+85.5% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Delivers 62.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 56.8 vs 35.0 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $349 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌128.6% higher power demand at 160W vs 70W.
- ❌43.7% longer card at 240mm vs 167mm.
Intel Arc Pro B50
2025Why buy it
- ✅Costs $50 less on MSRP ($349 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 70W instead of 160W, a 90W reduction.
- ✅Measures 167mm instead of 240mm, a 73mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (12,208 vs 22,651).
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 35.0 vs 56.8 G3D/$ ($349 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
2023Intel Arc Pro B50
2025Why buy it
- ✅+85.5% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Delivers 62.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 56.8 vs 35.0 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $349 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $50 less on MSRP ($349 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 70W instead of 160W, a 90W reduction.
- ✅Measures 167mm instead of 240mm, a 73mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌128.6% higher power demand at 160W vs 70W.
- ❌43.7% longer card at 240mm vs 167mm.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (12,208 vs 22,651).
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 35.0 vs 56.8 G3D/$ ($349 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 4060 Ti better than Intel Arc Pro B50?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does Intel Arc Pro B50 make more sense than GeForce RTX 4060 Ti?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Intel Arc Pro B50 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 177 FPS | 80 FPS |
| medium | 162 FPS | 58 FPS |
| high | 142 FPS | 46 FPS |
| ultra | 124 FPS | 29 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 143 FPS | 63 FPS |
| medium | 118 FPS | 37 FPS |
| high | 101 FPS | 24 FPS |
| ultra | 93 FPS | 16 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 93 FPS | 35 FPS |
| medium | 79 FPS | 21 FPS |
| high | 66 FPS | 15 FPS |
| ultra | 59 FPS | 11 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Intel Arc Pro B50 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 425 FPS | 185 FPS |
| medium | 359 FPS | 135 FPS |
| high | 292 FPS | 92 FPS |
| ultra | 237 FPS | 63 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 270 FPS | 107 FPS |
| medium | 229 FPS | 70 FPS |
| high | 186 FPS | 52 FPS |
| ultra | 154 FPS | 40 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 117 FPS | 44 FPS |
| medium | 95 FPS | 32 FPS |
| high | 77 FPS | 26 FPS |
| ultra | 60 FPS | 21 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Intel Arc Pro B50 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 855 FPS | 549 FPS |
| medium | 693 FPS | 439 FPS |
| high | 609 FPS | 366 FPS |
| ultra | 510 FPS | 275 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 660 FPS | 412 FPS |
| medium | 527 FPS | 330 FPS |
| high | 452 FPS | 275 FPS |
| ultra | 382 FPS | 206 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 447 FPS | 275 FPS |
| medium | 355 FPS | 220 FPS |
| high | 308 FPS | 183 FPS |
| ultra | 255 FPS | 137 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Intel Arc Pro B50 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 775 FPS | 549 FPS |
| medium | 639 FPS | 439 FPS |
| high | 558 FPS | 366 FPS |
| ultra | 492 FPS | 275 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 613 FPS | 412 FPS |
| medium | 503 FPS | 330 FPS |
| high | 435 FPS | 275 FPS |
| ultra | 378 FPS | 206 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 375 FPS | 275 FPS |
| medium | 322 FPS | 220 FPS |
| high | 298 FPS | 183 FPS |
| ultra | 255 FPS | 137 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4060 Ti and Intel Arc Pro B50

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2535 MHz. It has 4352 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 34 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,651 points. Launch price was $399.

Intel Arc Pro B50
Intel Arc Pro B50
The Intel Arc Pro B50 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in September 5 2025. It features the Xe2 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1700 MHz to 2600 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 16 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,208 points. Launch price was $349.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti scores 22,651 versus the Intel Arc Pro B50's 12,208 — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti leads by 85.5%. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is built on Ada Lovelace while the Intel Arc Pro B50 uses Xe2, both on a 5 nm process. Shader units: 4,352 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 2,048 (Intel Arc Pro B50). Raw compute: 22.06 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 10.65 TFLOPS (Intel Arc Pro B50). Boost clocks: 2535 MHz vs 2600 MHz. Ray tracing: 34 RT cores (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 16 (Intel Arc Pro B50) with 136 Tensor cores.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Intel Arc Pro B50 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 22,651+86% | 12,208 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Xe2 |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 4352+113% | 2048 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 22.06 TFLOPS+107% | 10.65 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2535 MHz | 2600 MHz+3% |
| ROPs | 48+200% | 16 |
| TMUs | 136+6% | 128 |
| L2 Cache | 32 MB+700% | 4 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 34+113% | 16 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Intel Arc Pro B50 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Intel Arc Pro B50 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Intel Arc Pro B50 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 8 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 32 MB (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 4 MB (Intel Arc Pro B50) — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Intel Arc Pro B50 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 32 MB+700% | 4 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 12.2 (Intel Arc Pro B50). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Intel Arc Pro B50 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.4+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs Dual Arc Media Engine (Intel Arc Pro B50). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs Dual Arc Media Engine. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Intel Arc Pro B50).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Intel Arc Pro B50 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 8th Gen NVENC | Dual Arc Media Engine |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | Dual Arc Media Engine |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti draws 160W versus the Intel Arc Pro B50's 70W — a 78.3% difference. The Intel Arc Pro B50 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 500W (Intel Arc Pro B50). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 240mm vs 167mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Intel Arc Pro B50 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 160W | 70W-56% |
| Recommended PSU | 550W | 500W-9% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 240mm | 167mm |
| Height | 111mm | 69mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C-7% | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 141.6 | 174.4+23% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti launched at $399 MSRP, while the Intel Arc Pro B50 launched at $349. The Intel Arc Pro B50 costs 12.5% less ($50 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 56.8 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 35.0 (Intel Arc Pro B50) — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti offers 62.3% better value. The Intel Arc Pro B50 is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2023).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Intel Arc Pro B50 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $399 | $349-13% |
| Performance per Dollar | 56.8+62% | 35.0 |
| Codename | AD106 | BMG-G21 |
| Release | May 18 2023 | September 5 2025 |
| Ranking | #59 | #221 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












