
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (móvel)
Popular choices:

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (móvel)
2019Why buy it
- ✅Draws 80W instead of 160W, a 80W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4060 Ti across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 8 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 56.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
2023Why buy it
- ✅73.9% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 56.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌100% higher power demand at 160W vs 80W.
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (móvel)
2019GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
2023Why buy it
- ✅Draws 80W instead of 160W, a 80W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅73.9% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 56.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4060 Ti across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 8 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 56.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌100% higher power demand at 160W vs 80W.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 4060 Ti better than GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (móvel)?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (móvel) still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (móvel) | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 124 FPS | 177 FPS |
| medium | 110 FPS | 162 FPS |
| high | 96 FPS | 142 FPS |
| ultra | 79 FPS | 124 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 111 FPS | 143 FPS |
| medium | 93 FPS | 118 FPS |
| high | 78 FPS | 101 FPS |
| ultra | 66 FPS | 93 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 60 FPS | 93 FPS |
| medium | 54 FPS | 79 FPS |
| high | 36 FPS | 66 FPS |
| ultra | 31 FPS | 59 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (móvel) | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 262 FPS | 433 FPS |
| medium | 225 FPS | 363 FPS |
| high | 168 FPS | 294 FPS |
| ultra | 133 FPS | 240 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 181 FPS | 278 FPS |
| medium | 154 FPS | 238 FPS |
| high | 122 FPS | 194 FPS |
| ultra | 99 FPS | 161 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 105 FPS | 123 FPS |
| medium | 88 FPS | 102 FPS |
| high | 71 FPS | 84 FPS |
| ultra | 55 FPS | 65 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (móvel) | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 456 FPS | 855 FPS |
| medium | 365 FPS | 693 FPS |
| high | 304 FPS | 609 FPS |
| ultra | 228 FPS | 510 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 342 FPS | 660 FPS |
| medium | 273 FPS | 527 FPS |
| high | 228 FPS | 452 FPS |
| ultra | 171 FPS | 382 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 228 FPS | 447 FPS |
| medium | 182 FPS | 355 FPS |
| high | 144 FPS | 308 FPS |
| ultra | 100 FPS | 255 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (móvel) | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 399 FPS | 775 FPS |
| medium | 334 FPS | 639 FPS |
| high | 267 FPS | 558 FPS |
| ultra | 227 FPS | 492 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 328 FPS | 613 FPS |
| medium | 271 FPS | 503 FPS |
| high | 206 FPS | 435 FPS |
| ultra | 165 FPS | 378 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 157 FPS | 375 FPS |
| medium | 121 FPS | 322 FPS |
| high | 107 FPS | 298 FPS |
| ultra | 85 FPS | 255 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (móvel) and GeForce RTX 4060 Ti

GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (móvel)
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (móvel)
The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (móvel) is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1455 MHz to 1590 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 80W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,128 points. Launch price was $229.

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2535 MHz. It has 4352 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 34 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,651 points. Launch price was $399.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (móvel) scores 10,128 versus the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti's 22,651 — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti leads by 123.6%. The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (móvel) is built on Turing while the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti uses Ada Lovelace, both on 12 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 1,536 (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (móvel)) vs 4,352 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti). Raw compute: 4.884 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (móvel)) vs 22.06 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti). Boost clocks: 1590 MHz vs 2535 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (móvel) | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 10,128 | 22,651+124% |
| Architecture | Turing | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 1536 | 4352+183% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 4.884 TFLOPS | 22.06 TFLOPS+352% |
| Boost Clock | 1590 MHz | 2535 MHz+59% |
| ROPs | 48 | 48 |
| TMUs | 96 | 136+42% |
| L1 Cache | 1.5 MB | 4.3 MB+187% |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB | 32 MB+2033% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (móvel) lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti supports the newer DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution, whereas the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (móvel) is capped at Upscaling support.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (móvel) | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | Yes (DLSS 3.5) |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 8 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 192-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 1.5 MB (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (móvel)) vs 32 MB (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (móvel) | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 288 GB/s | 288 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 192-bit+50% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB | 32 MB+2033% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (móvel)) vs 12.2 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (móvel) | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.1 | 1.3+18% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 6.0 (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (móvel)) vs 8th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP8 vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (móvel)) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (móvel) | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 6.0 | 8th Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP8 | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (móvel) draws 80W versus the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti's 160W — a 66.7% difference. The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (móvel) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (móvel)) vs 550W (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 8-pin. Card length: 0mm vs 240mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 70°C.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (móvel) | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 80W-50% | 160W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W-9% | 550W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 8-pin |
| Length | 0mm | 240mm |
| Height | 0mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 70°C-18% |
| Perf/Watt | 126.6 | 141.6+12% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2019).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (móvel) | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $399 |
| Codename | TU116 | AD106 |
| Release | April 23 2019 | May 18 2023 |
| Ranking | #250 | #59 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.











