G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce RTX 5060

2025

Why buy it

✅Costs $1,700 less on MSRP ($299 MSRP vs $1,999 MSRP).
✅Delivers 574% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 69.7 vs 10.3 G3D/$ ($299 MSRP vs $1,999 MSRP).
✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 2 GB).
✅Measures 241mm instead of 267mm, a 26mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (120 vs 192), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
❌107.1% higher power demand at 145W vs 70W.

RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation

2023

Why buy it

✅60% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (192 vs 120).
✅Draws 70W instead of 145W, a 75W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌
568.6% HIGHER MSRP
$1,999 MSRPvs$299 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 10.3 vs 69.7 G3D/$ ($1,999 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
❌10.8% longer card at 267mm vs 241mm.

GeForce RTX 5060

2025

RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation

2023

Why buy it

✅Costs $1,700 less on MSRP ($299 MSRP vs $1,999 MSRP).
✅Delivers 574% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 69.7 vs 10.3 G3D/$ ($299 MSRP vs $1,999 MSRP).
✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 2 GB).
✅Measures 241mm instead of 267mm, a 26mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Why buy it

✅60% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (192 vs 120).
✅Draws 70W instead of 145W, a 75W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (120 vs 192), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
❌107.1% higher power demand at 145W vs 70W.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌
568.6% HIGHER MSRP
$1,999 MSRPvs$299 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 10.3 vs 69.7 G3D/$ ($1,999 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
❌10.8% longer card at 267mm vs 241mm.

Quick Answers

So, is GeForce RTX 5060 better than RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation?

Yes, but this is not really about a huge raw performance gap. The broader synthetic picture is also very close at 20,836 vs 20,669 in G3D Mark. The bigger reason to prefer GeForce RTX 5060 is the overall package: you are getting a newer generation, DLSS 4 + Multi Frame Gen.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce RTX 5060 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2025 generation instead of 2023, more VRAM at 8 GB instead of 2 GB, and better upscaling support with DLSS 4 Super Resolution (2025) instead of DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution (2023) and better frame-generation support with DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation (2025) instead of DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023). That extra memory headroom makes it the safer pick for newer games, heavier textures, and higher settings over time.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

GeForce RTX 5060 can still make sense if you find it at the right price, especially around $299 MSRP. GeForce RTX 5060 is still the smarter buy for most people, though, because the raw performance is close while the overall package is cleaner. GeForce RTX 5060 is about $1,700 cheaper on MSRP at $299 MSRP versus $1,999 MSRP, and you are getting 0.8% higher G3D Mark. Moving to $299 MSRP gets you newer hardware, and DLSS 4 + Multi Frame Gen.

Is RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation still worth buying for gaming in 2026?

Yes. RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation is still a strong gaming card in 2026: it is excellent for 1080p, very strong for 1440p, and still capable at 4K with sensible settings or upscaling. Price is really the swing factor here. If you find it at or below $1,999 MSRP, it remains a very sensible buy. GeForce RTX 5060 is still the safer recommendation for most fresh builds because it offers a cleaner overall package with newer hardware and DLSS 4 + Multi Frame Gen.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce RTX 5060 Benchmark Check

RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 5060	RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation
1080p
low	176 FPS	102 FPS
medium	161 FPS	87 FPS
high	141 FPS	70 FPS
ultra	123 FPS	48 FPS
1440p
low	141 FPS	81 FPS
medium	117 FPS	68 FPS
high	101 FPS	49 FPS
ultra	93 FPS	33 FPS
4K
low	92 FPS	33 FPS
medium	78 FPS	30 FPS
high	66 FPS	22 FPS
ultra	59 FPS	20 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 5060 Open RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 5060	RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation
1080p
low	378 FPS	279 FPS
medium	322 FPS	221 FPS
high	256 FPS	177 FPS
ultra	205 FPS	155 FPS
1440p
low	237 FPS	203 FPS
medium	206 FPS	154 FPS
high	166 FPS	126 FPS
ultra	134 FPS	103 FPS
4K
low	117 FPS	93 FPS
medium	97 FPS	72 FPS
high	80 FPS	62 FPS
ultra	62 FPS	48 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 5060 Open RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	GeForce RTX 5060	RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation
1080p
low	835 FPS	465 FPS
medium	676 FPS	404 FPS
high	594 FPS	341 FPS
ultra	469 FPS	288 FPS
1440p
low	639 FPS	339 FPS
medium	516 FPS	295 FPS
high	443 FPS	256 FPS
ultra	352 FPS	208 FPS
4K
low	422 FPS	229 FPS
medium	339 FPS	192 FPS
high	289 FPS	150 FPS
ultra	234 FPS	113 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 5060 Open RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	GeForce RTX 5060	RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation
1080p
low	743 FPS	208 FPS
medium	608 FPS	171 FPS
high	532 FPS	151 FPS
ultra	469 FPS	119 FPS
1440p
low	600 FPS	146 FPS
medium	490 FPS	124 FPS
high	424 FPS	111 FPS
ultra	352 FPS	86 FPS
4K
low	362 FPS	87 FPS
medium	310 FPS	72 FPS
high	287 FPS	58 FPS
ultra	234 FPS	43 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 5060 Open RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 5060 and RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation

GeForce RTX 5060

The GeForce RTX 5060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 19 2025. It features the Blackwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2280 MHz to 2497 MHz. It has 3840 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 145W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 30 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 20,836 points. Launch price was $299.

RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation

The RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 21 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 720 MHz to 1560 MHz. It has 6144 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 48 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 20,669 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce RTX 5060 scores 20,836 and the RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation reaches 20,669 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce RTX 5060 is built on Blackwell 2.0 while the RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation uses Ada Lovelace, both on a 5 nm process. Shader units: 3,840 (GeForce RTX 5060) vs 6,144 (RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation). Raw compute: 19.18 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 5060) vs 19.17 TFLOPS (RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation). Boost clocks: 2497 MHz vs 1560 MHz. Ray tracing: 30 RT cores (GeForce RTX 5060) vs 48 (RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation) with 120 Tensor cores vs 192.

Feature	GeForce RTX 5060	RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation
G3D Mark Score	20,836	20,669
Architecture	Blackwell 2.0	Ada Lovelace
Process Node	5 nm	5 nm
Shading Units	3840	6144+60%
Compute (TFLOPS)	19.18 TFLOPS	19.17 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	2497 MHz+60%	1560 MHz
ROPs	48	64+33%
TMUs	120	192+60%
L1 Cache	3.8 MB	6 MB+58%
L2 Cache	32 MB	48 MB+50%
Ray Tracing Cores	30	48+60%
Tensor Cores	120	192+60%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Both cards support Frame Generation, but the GeForce RTX 5060 is on a newer tier with DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation, while the RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation tops out at DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation.The GeForce RTX 5060 supports the newer DLSS 4 Super Resolution, whereas the RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation is capped at DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution.

Feature	GeForce RTX 5060	RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation
Upscaling Tech	DLSS 4 Super Resolution	DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution
Frame Generation	DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation+14%	DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation
Ray Reconstruction	Yes (DLSS 4)+14%	Yes (DLSS 3.5)
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	NVIDIA Reflex

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce RTX 5060 comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation has 2 GB. The GeForce RTX 5060 offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 448 GB/s (GeForce RTX 5060) vs 280 GB/s (RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation) — a 60% advantage for the GeForce RTX 5060. Bus width: 128-bit vs 160-bit. L2 Cache: 32 MB (GeForce RTX 5060) vs 48 MB (RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation) — the RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce RTX 5060	RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation
VRAM Capacity	8 GB+300%	2 GB
Memory Type	GDDR7	GDDR6 ECC
Memory Bandwidth	448 GB/s+60%	280 GB/s
Bus Width	128-bit	160-bit+25%
L2 Cache	32 MB	48 MB+50%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 5060) vs 12.2 (RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	GeForce RTX 5060	RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation
DirectX	12 Ultimate	12.2+2%
Vulkan	1.4+8%	1.3
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 9th gen (GeForce RTX 5060) vs 8th Gen NVENC (2x) (RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation). Decoder: NVDEC 6th gen vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 (GeForce RTX 5060) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation).

Feature	GeForce RTX 5060	RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation
Encoder	NVENC 9th gen	8th Gen NVENC (2x)
Decoder	NVDEC 6th gen	5th Gen NVDEC
Codecs	H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 5060 draws 145W versus the RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation's 70W — a 69.8% difference. The RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 450W (GeForce RTX 5060) vs 750W (RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation). Power connectors: 8-pin vs 1x 8-pin. Card length: 241mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 65°C vs 80°C.

Feature	GeForce RTX 5060	RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation
TDP	145W	70W-52%
Recommended PSU	450W-40%	750W
Power Connector	8-pin	1x 8-pin
Length	241mm	267mm
Height	111mm	111mm
Slots	2	2
Temp (Load)	65°C-19%	80°C
Perf/Watt	143.7	295.3+105%

💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce RTX 5060 launched at $299 MSRP, while the RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation launched at $1999. The GeForce RTX 5060 costs 85% less ($1700 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 69.7 (GeForce RTX 5060) vs 10.3 (RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation) — the GeForce RTX 5060 offers 576.7% better value. The GeForce RTX 5060 is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2023).