
GeForce RTX 5060
Popular choices:

Radeon RX 7900M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 5060
2025Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 69.7 vs 0 G3D/$ ($299 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Newer upscaling generation: DLSS 4 Super Resolution (2025) vs FSR 3 (2023).
- ✅Draws 145W instead of 180W, a 35W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon RX 7900M across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
Radeon RX 7900M
2023Why buy it
- ✅26.2% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 8 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR 3 (2023) instead.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 69.7 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
- ❌24.1% higher power demand at 180W vs 145W.
GeForce RTX 5060
2025Radeon RX 7900M
2023Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 69.7 vs 0 G3D/$ ($299 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Newer upscaling generation: DLSS 4 Super Resolution (2025) vs FSR 3 (2023).
- ✅Draws 145W instead of 180W, a 35W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅26.2% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 8 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon RX 7900M across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
Trade-offs
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR 3 (2023) instead.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 69.7 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
- ❌24.1% higher power demand at 180W vs 145W.
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon RX 7900M better than GeForce RTX 5060?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does GeForce RTX 5060 make more sense than Radeon RX 7900M?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 5060 | Radeon RX 7900M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 176 FPS | 223 FPS |
| medium | 161 FPS | 207 FPS |
| high | 141 FPS | 182 FPS |
| ultra | 123 FPS | 166 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 141 FPS | 202 FPS |
| medium | 117 FPS | 171 FPS |
| high | 101 FPS | 141 FPS |
| ultra | 93 FPS | 133 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 92 FPS | 137 FPS |
| medium | 78 FPS | 115 FPS |
| high | 66 FPS | 92 FPS |
| ultra | 59 FPS | 86 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 5060 | Radeon RX 7900M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 378 FPS | 576 FPS |
| medium | 322 FPS | 480 FPS |
| high | 256 FPS | 368 FPS |
| ultra | 205 FPS | 314 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 237 FPS | 393 FPS |
| medium | 206 FPS | 326 FPS |
| high | 166 FPS | 257 FPS |
| ultra | 134 FPS | 209 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 117 FPS | 194 FPS |
| medium | 97 FPS | 164 FPS |
| high | 80 FPS | 140 FPS |
| ultra | 62 FPS | 113 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 5060 | Radeon RX 7900M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 835 FPS | 938 FPS |
| medium | 676 FPS | 769 FPS |
| high | 594 FPS | 672 FPS |
| ultra | 469 FPS | 504 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 639 FPS | 709 FPS |
| medium | 516 FPS | 583 FPS |
| high | 443 FPS | 504 FPS |
| ultra | 352 FPS | 378 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 422 FPS | 495 FPS |
| medium | 339 FPS | 403 FPS |
| high | 289 FPS | 336 FPS |
| ultra | 234 FPS | 252 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 5060 | Radeon RX 7900M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 743 FPS | 765 FPS |
| medium | 608 FPS | 653 FPS |
| high | 532 FPS | 588 FPS |
| ultra | 469 FPS | 504 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 600 FPS | 640 FPS |
| medium | 490 FPS | 549 FPS |
| high | 424 FPS | 480 FPS |
| ultra | 352 FPS | 378 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 362 FPS | 435 FPS |
| medium | 310 FPS | 379 FPS |
| high | 287 FPS | 336 FPS |
| ultra | 234 FPS | 252 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 5060 and Radeon RX 7900M

GeForce RTX 5060
GeForce RTX 5060
The GeForce RTX 5060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 19 2025. It features the Blackwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2280 MHz to 2497 MHz. It has 3840 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 145W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 30 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 20,836 points. Launch price was $299.

Radeon RX 7900M
Radeon RX 7900M
The Radeon RX 7900M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 19 2023. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1825 MHz to 2090 MHz. It has 4608 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 72 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,385 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 5060 scores 20,836 versus the Radeon RX 7900M's 22,385 — the Radeon RX 7900M leads by 7.4%. The GeForce RTX 5060 is built on Blackwell 2.0 while the Radeon RX 7900M uses RDNA 3.0, both on a 5 nm process. Shader units: 3,840 (GeForce RTX 5060) vs 4,608 (Radeon RX 7900M). Raw compute: 19.18 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 5060) vs 38.52 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 7900M). Boost clocks: 2497 MHz vs 2090 MHz. Ray tracing: 30 RT cores (GeForce RTX 5060) vs 72 (Radeon RX 7900M) with 120 Tensor cores.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 5060 | Radeon RX 7900M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 20,836 | 22,385+7% |
| Architecture | Blackwell 2.0 | RDNA 3.0 |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 3840 | 4608+20% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 19.18 TFLOPS | 38.52 TFLOPS+101% |
| Boost Clock | 2497 MHz+19% | 2090 MHz |
| ROPs | 48 | 192+300% |
| TMUs | 120 | 288+140% |
| L1 Cache | 3.8 MB+27% | 3 MB |
| L2 Cache | 32 MB+433% | 6 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 30 | 72+140% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
Both GPUs support Frame Generation technologies, but they achieve it differently. The GeForce RTX 5060 uses DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation, while the Radeon RX 7900M relies on FSR Frame Generation + AFMF. Both can significantly boost FPS in supported titles, but they are not on the same feature stack.The GeForce RTX 5060 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon RX 7900M relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 5060 | Radeon RX 7900M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 4 Super Resolution | FSR 3 |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation | FSR Frame Generation + AFMF |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 4) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 5060 comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 7900M has 16 GB. The Radeon RX 7900M offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 448 GB/s (GeForce RTX 5060) vs 576 GB/s (Radeon RX 7900M) — a 28.6% advantage for the Radeon RX 7900M. Bus width: 128-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 32 MB (GeForce RTX 5060) vs 6 MB (Radeon RX 7900M) — the GeForce RTX 5060 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 5060 | Radeon RX 7900M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 16 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR7 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 448 GB/s | 576 GB/s+29% |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 256-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 32 MB+433% | 6 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 5060) vs 12.2 (Radeon RX 7900M). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 1.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 5060 | Radeon RX 7900M |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.4+8% | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4+300% | 1 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 9th gen (GeForce RTX 5060) vs VCN 4.0 (Radeon RX 7900M). Decoder: NVDEC 6th gen vs VCN 4.0. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 (GeForce RTX 5060) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon RX 7900M).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 5060 | Radeon RX 7900M |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 9th gen | VCN 4.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC 6th gen | VCN 4.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 5060 draws 145W versus the Radeon RX 7900M's 180W — a 21.5% difference. The GeForce RTX 5060 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 450W (GeForce RTX 5060) vs 330W (Radeon RX 7900M). Power connectors: 8-pin vs Mobile. Card length: 241mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 65°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 5060 | Radeon RX 7900M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 145W-19% | 180W |
| Recommended PSU | 450W | 330W-27% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | Mobile |
| Length | 241mm | 0mm |
| Height | 111mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 65°C-24% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 143.7+16% | 124.4 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 5060 is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2023).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 5060 | Radeon RX 7900M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $299 | — |
| Codename | GB206 | Navi 31 |
| Release | May 19 2025 | October 19 2023 |
| Ranking | #69 | #62 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












