
Radeon RX 9070
Popular choices:

RTX 4000 Ada Generation
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Radeon RX 9070
2025Why buy it
- ✅22.3% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $1,450 less on MSRP ($549 MSRP vs $1,999 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 284.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 46.2 vs 12.0 G3D/$ ($549 MSRP vs $1,999 MSRP).
- ✅700% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 2 GB).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 4.0 (2025) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌214.3% higher power demand at 220W vs 70W.
RTX 4000 Ada Generation
2023Why buy it
- ✅Access to DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution (2023).
- ✅Draws 70W instead of 220W, a 150W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon RX 9070 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: Radeon RX 9070 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌264.1% HIGHER MSRP$1,999 MSRPvs$549 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 12.0 vs 46.2 G3D/$ ($1,999 MSRP vs $549 MSRP).
Radeon RX 9070
2025RTX 4000 Ada Generation
2023Why buy it
- ✅22.3% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $1,450 less on MSRP ($549 MSRP vs $1,999 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 284.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 46.2 vs 12.0 G3D/$ ($549 MSRP vs $1,999 MSRP).
- ✅700% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 2 GB).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 4.0 (2025) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅Access to DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution (2023).
- ✅Draws 70W instead of 220W, a 150W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌214.3% higher power demand at 220W vs 70W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon RX 9070 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: Radeon RX 9070 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌264.1% HIGHER MSRP$1,999 MSRPvs$549 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 12.0 vs 46.2 G3D/$ ($1,999 MSRP vs $549 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon RX 9070 better than RTX 4000 Ada Generation?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is RTX 4000 Ada Generation still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Radeon RX 9070 | RTX 4000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 211 FPS | 123 FPS |
| medium | 196 FPS | 115 FPS |
| high | 167 FPS | 96 FPS |
| ultra | 153 FPS | 83 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 193 FPS | 102 FPS |
| medium | 163 FPS | 89 FPS |
| high | 131 FPS | 72 FPS |
| ultra | 121 FPS | 63 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 128 FPS | 56 FPS |
| medium | 106 FPS | 50 FPS |
| high | 82 FPS | 39 FPS |
| ultra | 75 FPS | 36 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Radeon RX 9070 | RTX 4000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 450 FPS | 495 FPS |
| medium | 378 FPS | 418 FPS |
| high | 294 FPS | 328 FPS |
| ultra | 241 FPS | 283 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 322 FPS | 338 FPS |
| medium | 267 FPS | 279 FPS |
| high | 210 FPS | 227 FPS |
| ultra | 173 FPS | 190 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 145 FPS | 165 FPS |
| medium | 124 FPS | 138 FPS |
| high | 101 FPS | 120 FPS |
| ultra | 77 FPS | 97 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Radeon RX 9070 | RTX 4000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 900 FPS | 549 FPS |
| medium | 745 FPS | 468 FPS |
| high | 661 FPS | 396 FPS |
| ultra | 562 FPS | 333 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 693 FPS | 434 FPS |
| medium | 568 FPS | 367 FPS |
| high | 493 FPS | 315 FPS |
| ultra | 412 FPS | 260 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 481 FPS | 271 FPS |
| medium | 397 FPS | 225 FPS |
| high | 334 FPS | 187 FPS |
| ultra | 271 FPS | 149 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Radeon RX 9070 | RTX 4000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 809 FPS | 401 FPS |
| medium | 703 FPS | 332 FPS |
| high | 633 FPS | 301 FPS |
| ultra | 558 FPS | 277 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 641 FPS | 313 FPS |
| medium | 558 FPS | 261 FPS |
| high | 488 FPS | 236 FPS |
| ultra | 428 FPS | 214 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 429 FPS | 179 FPS |
| medium | 381 FPS | 156 FPS |
| high | 344 FPS | 142 FPS |
| ultra | 286 FPS | 123 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon RX 9070 and RTX 4000 Ada Generation

Radeon RX 9070
Radeon RX 9070
The Radeon RX 9070 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 6 2025. It features the RDNA 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1330 MHz to 2520 MHz. It has 3584 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 220W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 56 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 25,380 points. Launch price was $549.

RTX 4000 Ada Generation
RTX 4000 Ada Generation
The RTX 4000 Ada Generation is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 9 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1500 MHz to 1560 MHz. It has 6144 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 48 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 24,046 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Radeon RX 9070 scores 25,380 versus the RTX 4000 Ada Generation's 24,046 — the Radeon RX 9070 leads by 5.5%. The Radeon RX 9070 is built on RDNA 4.0 while the RTX 4000 Ada Generation uses Ada Lovelace, both on a 5 nm process. Shader units: 3,584 (Radeon RX 9070) vs 6,144 (RTX 4000 Ada Generation). Raw compute: 36.13 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 9070) vs 26.73 TFLOPS (RTX 4000 Ada Generation). Boost clocks: 2520 MHz vs 1560 MHz. Ray tracing: 56 RT cores (Radeon RX 9070) vs 48 (RTX 4000 Ada Generation) with 112 Tensor cores vs 192.
| Feature | Radeon RX 9070 | RTX 4000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 25,380+6% | 24,046 |
| Architecture | RDNA 4.0 | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 3584 | 6144+71% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 36.13 TFLOPS+35% | 26.73 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2520 MHz+62% | 1560 MHz |
| ROPs | 128+100% | 64 |
| TMUs | 224+17% | 192 |
| L2 Cache | 8 MB | 48 MB+500% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 56+17% | 48 |
| Tensor Cores | 112 | 192+71% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
Both cards support Frame Generation, but the Radeon RX 9070 is on a newer tier with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF 2.1, while the RTX 4000 Ada Generation tops out at DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation.The RTX 4000 Ada Generation gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon RX 9070 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | Radeon RX 9070 | RTX 4000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | FSR Frame Generation + AFMF 2.1 | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation+67% |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | Yes (DLSS 3.5) |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon RX 9070 comes with 16 GB of VRAM, while the RTX 4000 Ada Generation has 2 GB. The Radeon RX 9070 offers 700% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 640 GB/s (Radeon RX 9070) vs 360 GB/s (RTX 4000 Ada Generation) — a 77.8% advantage for the Radeon RX 9070. Bus width: 256-bit vs 160-bit. L2 Cache: 8 MB (Radeon RX 9070) vs 48 MB (RTX 4000 Ada Generation) — the RTX 4000 Ada Generation has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon RX 9070 | RTX 4000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 16 GB+700% | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 ECC |
| Memory Bandwidth | 640 GB/s+78% | 360 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+60% | 160-bit |
| L2 Cache | 8 MB | 48 MB+500% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (Radeon RX 9070) vs 12.2 (RTX 4000 Ada Generation). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon RX 9070 | RTX 4000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.4+8% | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: Dual Media Engine (Radeon RX 9070) vs 8th Gen NVENC (3x) (RTX 4000 Ada Generation). Decoder: Dual Media Engine vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,AV1 (Radeon RX 9070) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (RTX 4000 Ada Generation).
| Feature | Radeon RX 9070 | RTX 4000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | Dual Media Engine | 8th Gen NVENC (3x) |
| Decoder | Dual Media Engine | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon RX 9070 draws 220W versus the RTX 4000 Ada Generation's 70W — a 103.4% difference. The RTX 4000 Ada Generation is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (Radeon RX 9070) vs 750W (RTX 4000 Ada Generation). Power connectors: 2x 8-pin vs 1x 8-pin. Card length: 267mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 85 vs 80°C.
| Feature | Radeon RX 9070 | RTX 4000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 220W | 70W-68% |
| Recommended PSU | 650W-13% | 750W |
| Power Connector | 2x 8-pin | 1x 8-pin |
| Length | 267mm | 267mm |
| Height | 110mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 85 | 80°C-6% |
| Perf/Watt | 115.4 | 343.5+198% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon RX 9070 launched at $549 MSRP, while the RTX 4000 Ada Generation launched at $1999. The Radeon RX 9070 costs 72.5% less ($1450 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 46.2 (Radeon RX 9070) vs 12.0 (RTX 4000 Ada Generation) — the Radeon RX 9070 offers 285% better value. The Radeon RX 9070 is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2023).
| Feature | Radeon RX 9070 | RTX 4000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $549-73% | $1999 |
| Performance per Dollar | 46.2+285% | 12.0 |
| Codename | Navi 48 | AD104 |
| Release | March 6 2025 | August 9 2023 |
| Ranking | #39 | #47 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












