
GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile
Popular choices:

RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile
2025Why buy it
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation (2025).
- ✅More future proof: Blackwell (2024−2025) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅More future proof: Blackwell (2024−2025) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU
2023Why buy it
- ✅97.5% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation (2025).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile
2025RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU
2023Why buy it
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation (2025).
- ✅More future proof: Blackwell (2024−2025) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅More future proof: Blackwell (2024−2025) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅97.5% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation (2025).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile better than RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile | RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 112 FPS | 141 FPS |
| medium | 94 FPS | 122 FPS |
| high | 82 FPS | 104 FPS |
| ultra | 55 FPS | 73 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 99 FPS | 113 FPS |
| medium | 80 FPS | 94 FPS |
| high | 63 FPS | 73 FPS |
| ultra | 42 FPS | 51 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 40 FPS | 50 FPS |
| medium | 36 FPS | 44 FPS |
| high | 23 FPS | 32 FPS |
| ultra | 19 FPS | 27 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile | RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 157 FPS | 370 FPS |
| medium | 120 FPS | 316 FPS |
| high | 82 FPS | 250 FPS |
| ultra | 55 FPS | 213 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 102 FPS | 277 FPS |
| medium | 66 FPS | 230 FPS |
| high | 48 FPS | 182 FPS |
| ultra | 36 FPS | 146 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 50 FPS | 130 FPS |
| medium | 35 FPS | 111 FPS |
| high | 28 FPS | 92 FPS |
| ultra | 21 FPS | 68 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile | RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 677 FPS | 826 FPS |
| medium | 539 FPS | 679 FPS |
| high | 463 FPS | 612 FPS |
| ultra | 402 FPS | 538 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 477 FPS | 628 FPS |
| medium | 392 FPS | 510 FPS |
| high | 330 FPS | 451 FPS |
| ultra | 276 FPS | 391 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 303 FPS | 405 FPS |
| medium | 247 FPS | 323 FPS |
| high | 191 FPS | 264 FPS |
| ultra | 140 FPS | 209 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile | RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 216 FPS | 287 FPS |
| medium | 184 FPS | 248 FPS |
| high | 149 FPS | 205 FPS |
| ultra | 125 FPS | 179 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 172 FPS | 228 FPS |
| medium | 147 FPS | 200 FPS |
| high | 114 FPS | 167 FPS |
| ultra | 94 FPS | 142 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 93 FPS | 140 FPS |
| medium | 74 FPS | 118 FPS |
| high | 60 FPS | 95 FPS |
| ultra | 48 FPS | 78 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile and RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU

GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile
GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile
The GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 2 2025. It features the Blackwell 2.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 2130 MHz. It has 5888 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 115W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 26,000 points.

RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU
RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU
The RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 21 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 975 MHz to 1500 MHz. It has 5120 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 115W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 40 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 25,267 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile scores 26,000 and the RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU reaches 25,267 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile is built on Blackwell 2.0 while the RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU uses Ada Lovelace, both on 4 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 5,888 (GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile) vs 5,120 (RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU). Boost clocks: 2130 MHz vs 1500 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile | RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 26,000+3% | 25,267 |
| Architecture | Blackwell 2.0 | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 4 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 5888+15% | 5120 |
| Boost Clock | 2130 MHz+42% | 1500 MHz |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile is support for DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile supports the newer DLSS 4 Super Resolution, whereas the RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU is capped at Upscaling support.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile | RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 4 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 4) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 12 GB of GDDR6. Memory bandwidth: 672 GB/s (GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile) vs 432 GB/s (RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU) — a 55.6% advantage for the GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile. Bus width: 192-bit vs 192-bit.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile | RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 12 GB | 12 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 672 GB/s+56% | 432 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 192-bit | 192-bit |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (12_2) (GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile) vs 12 Ultimate (12_2) (RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile | RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
| Vulkan | 1.4+8% | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (Blackwell) (GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile) vs NVENC 8th Gen (RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU). Decoder: NVDEC (Blackwell) vs NVDEC 5th Gen. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,AV1,VP9,VP8,MPEG-2 (GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile) vs H.264,H.265,AV1 (RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile | RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (Blackwell) | NVENC 8th Gen |
| Decoder | NVDEC (Blackwell) | NVDEC 5th Gen |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,AV1,VP9,VP8,MPEG-2 | H.264,H.265,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile draws 115W versus the RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU's 115W — a 0% difference. The RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 130W (GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile) vs 650W (RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU). Power connectors: Mobile vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 105mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 80 vs 85.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile | RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 115W | 115W |
| Recommended PSU | 130W-80% | 650W |
| Power Connector | Mobile | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | 105mm |
| Height | 0mm | 82mm |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | 80-6% | 85 |
| Perf/Watt | 226.1+3% | 219.7 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












