
GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile
Popular choices:

RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile
2025Why buy it
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation (2025).
- ✅More future proof: Blackwell (2024−2025) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 115W instead of 140W, a 25W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell across 46 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 12 GB vs 24 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 13.3 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $1,999 MSRP).
RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell
2025Why buy it
- ✅187.0% more average FPS across 46 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 13.3 vs 0 G3D/$ ($1,999 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (24 GB vs 12 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation (2025).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌21.7% higher power demand at 140W vs 115W.
GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile
2025RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell
2025Why buy it
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation (2025).
- ✅More future proof: Blackwell (2024−2025) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 115W instead of 140W, a 25W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅187.0% more average FPS across 46 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 13.3 vs 0 G3D/$ ($1,999 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (24 GB vs 12 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell across 46 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 12 GB vs 24 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 13.3 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $1,999 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation (2025).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌21.7% higher power demand at 140W vs 115W.
Quick Answers
So, is RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell better than GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile make more sense than RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile | RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 141 FPS | 184 FPS |
| medium | 119 FPS | 163 FPS |
| high | 104 FPS | 141 FPS |
| ultra | 63 FPS | 103 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 123 FPS | 159 FPS |
| medium | 100 FPS | 135 FPS |
| high | 79 FPS | 103 FPS |
| ultra | 47 FPS | 74 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 44 FPS | 81 FPS |
| medium | 39 FPS | 69 FPS |
| high | 25 FPS | 51 FPS |
| ultra | 21 FPS | 46 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile | RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 157 FPS | 461 FPS |
| medium | 120 FPS | 397 FPS |
| high | 82 FPS | 320 FPS |
| ultra | 55 FPS | 281 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 102 FPS | 367 FPS |
| medium | 66 FPS | 307 FPS |
| high | 48 FPS | 246 FPS |
| ultra | 36 FPS | 201 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 50 FPS | 199 FPS |
| medium | 35 FPS | 167 FPS |
| high | 28 FPS | 144 FPS |
| ultra | 21 FPS | 117 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile | RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 893 FPS | 895 FPS |
| medium | 790 FPS | 731 FPS |
| high | 701 FPS | 643 FPS |
| ultra | 585 FPS | 556 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 631 FPS | 699 FPS |
| medium | 565 FPS | 567 FPS |
| high | 490 FPS | 488 FPS |
| ultra | 428 FPS | 416 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 367 FPS | 475 FPS |
| medium | 311 FPS | 388 FPS |
| high | 249 FPS | 332 FPS |
| ultra | 198 FPS | 270 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile | RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 266 FPS | 357 FPS |
| medium | 230 FPS | 315 FPS |
| high | 190 FPS | 275 FPS |
| ultra | 151 FPS | 239 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 204 FPS | 278 FPS |
| medium | 178 FPS | 247 FPS |
| high | 141 FPS | 212 FPS |
| ultra | 110 FPS | 180 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 109 FPS | 176 FPS |
| medium | 88 FPS | 151 FPS |
| high | 73 FPS | 116 FPS |
| ultra | 57 FPS | 95 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile and RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell

GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile
GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile
The GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 2 2025. It features the Blackwell 2.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 2130 MHz. It has 5888 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 115W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 26,000 points.

RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell
RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell
The RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 18 2025. It features the Blackwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1230 MHz to 2055 MHz. It has 8960 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 140W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 70 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 26,498 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile scores 26,000 and the RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell reaches 26,498 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile is built on Blackwell 2.0 while the RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell uses Blackwell 2.0, both on 4 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 5,888 (GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile) vs 8,960 (RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell). Boost clocks: 2130 MHz vs 2055 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile | RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 26,000 | 26,498+2% |
| Architecture | Blackwell 2.0 | Blackwell 2.0 |
| Process Node | 4 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 5888 | 8960+52% |
| Boost Clock | 2130 MHz+4% | 2055 MHz |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile is support for DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile supports the newer DLSS 4 Super Resolution, whereas the RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell is capped at Upscaling support.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile | RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 4 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 4) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile comes with 12 GB of VRAM, while the RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell has 24 GB. The RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 672 GB/s (GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile) vs 432 GB/s (RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell) — a 55.6% advantage for the GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile. Bus width: 192-bit vs 192-bit.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile | RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 12 GB | 24 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 672 GB/s+56% | 432 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 192-bit | 192-bit |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (12_2) (GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile) vs 12.2 (RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile | RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.4 | 1.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (Blackwell) (GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile) vs 9th Gen NVENC (2x) (RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell). Decoder: NVDEC (Blackwell) vs 6th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,AV1,VP9,VP8,MPEG-2 (GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile | RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (Blackwell) | 9th Gen NVENC (2x) |
| Decoder | NVDEC (Blackwell) | 6th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,AV1,VP9,VP8,MPEG-2 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile draws 115W versus the RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell's 140W — a 19.6% difference. The GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 130W (GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile) vs 650W (RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell). Power connectors: Mobile vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 267mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80 vs 80°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile | RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 115W-18% | 140W |
| Recommended PSU | 130W-80% | 650W |
| Power Connector | Mobile | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | 267mm |
| Height | 0mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80 | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 226.1+19% | 189.3 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












