
GeForce RTX 3070
Popular choices:

Tesla M40 24GB
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 3070
2020Why buy it
- ✅+108.4% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $1,501 less on MSRP ($499 MSRP vs $2,000 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 735.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.4 vs 5.3 G3D/$ ($499 MSRP vs $2,000 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Tesla M40 24GB
2015Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (10,641 vs 22,172).
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌300.8% HIGHER MSRP$2,000 MSRPvs$499 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 5.3 vs 44.4 G3D/$ ($2,000 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 3070
2020Tesla M40 24GB
2015Why buy it
- ✅+108.4% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $1,501 less on MSRP ($499 MSRP vs $2,000 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 735.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.4 vs 5.3 G3D/$ ($499 MSRP vs $2,000 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (10,641 vs 22,172).
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌300.8% HIGHER MSRP$2,000 MSRPvs$499 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 5.3 vs 44.4 G3D/$ ($2,000 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 3070 better than Tesla M40 24GB?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Tesla M40 24GB still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3070 | Tesla M40 24GB |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 158 FPS | 151 FPS |
| medium | 140 FPS | 130 FPS |
| high | 123 FPS | 106 FPS |
| ultra | 104 FPS | 65 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 134 FPS | 121 FPS |
| medium | 109 FPS | 103 FPS |
| high | 96 FPS | 76 FPS |
| ultra | 86 FPS | 47 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 80 FPS | 42 FPS |
| medium | 67 FPS | 38 FPS |
| high | 52 FPS | 24 FPS |
| ultra | 45 FPS | 20 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3070 | Tesla M40 24GB |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 470 FPS | 248 FPS |
| medium | 405 FPS | 214 FPS |
| high | 327 FPS | 163 FPS |
| ultra | 277 FPS | 128 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 294 FPS | 173 FPS |
| medium | 246 FPS | 142 FPS |
| high | 213 FPS | 115 FPS |
| ultra | 179 FPS | 89 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 141 FPS | 96 FPS |
| medium | 120 FPS | 78 FPS |
| high | 105 FPS | 65 FPS |
| ultra | 83 FPS | 49 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3070 | Tesla M40 24GB |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 885 FPS | 479 FPS |
| medium | 712 FPS | 383 FPS |
| high | 619 FPS | 319 FPS |
| ultra | 499 FPS | 239 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 692 FPS | 359 FPS |
| medium | 557 FPS | 287 FPS |
| high | 473 FPS | 239 FPS |
| ultra | 374 FPS | 180 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 479 FPS | 239 FPS |
| medium | 388 FPS | 192 FPS |
| high | 330 FPS | 160 FPS |
| ultra | 249 FPS | 120 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3070 | Tesla M40 24GB |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 600 FPS | 293 FPS |
| medium | 527 FPS | 252 FPS |
| high | 433 FPS | 210 FPS |
| ultra | 385 FPS | 163 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 489 FPS | 217 FPS |
| medium | 433 FPS | 192 FPS |
| high | 339 FPS | 154 FPS |
| ultra | 297 FPS | 118 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 292 FPS | 120 FPS |
| medium | 270 FPS | 96 FPS |
| high | 238 FPS | 80 FPS |
| ultra | 200 FPS | 61 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3070 and Tesla M40 24GB

GeForce RTX 3070
GeForce RTX 3070
The GeForce RTX 3070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 1 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1500 MHz to 1725 MHz. It has 5888 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 220W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,172 points. Launch price was $499.

Tesla M40 24GB
Tesla M40 24GB
The Tesla M40 24GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 10 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 948 MHz to 1112 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,641 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3070 scores 22,172 versus the Tesla M40 24GB's 10,641 — the GeForce RTX 3070 leads by 108.4%. The GeForce RTX 3070 is built on Ampere while the Tesla M40 24GB uses Maxwell 2.0, both on 8 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 5,888 (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 3,072 (Tesla M40 24GB). Raw compute: 20.31 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 6.832 TFLOPS (Tesla M40 24GB). Boost clocks: 1725 MHz vs 1112 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Tesla M40 24GB |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 22,172+108% | 10,641 |
| Architecture | Ampere | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 5888+92% | 3072 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 20.31 TFLOPS+197% | 6.832 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1725 MHz+55% | 1112 MHz |
| ROPs | 96 | 96 |
| TMUs | 184 | 192+4% |
| L1 Cache | 5.8 MB+427% | 1.1 MB |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+33% | 3 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3070 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Tesla M40 24GB relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Tesla M40 24GB |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 8 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 256-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 3 MB (Tesla M40 24GB) — the GeForce RTX 3070 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Tesla M40 24GB |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | 256-bit |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+33% | 3 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 12.1 (Tesla M40 24GB). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Tesla M40 24GB |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.4+27% | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6+2% | 4.5 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 7th gen (GeForce RTX 3070) vs NVENC 4.0 (2x) (Tesla M40 24GB). Decoder: NVDEC 5th gen vs PureVideo HD VP6. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 (GeForce RTX 3070) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Tesla M40 24GB).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Tesla M40 24GB |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 7th gen | NVENC 4.0 (2x) |
| Decoder | NVDEC 5th gen | PureVideo HD VP6 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3070 draws 220W versus the Tesla M40 24GB's 250W — a 12.8% difference. The GeForce RTX 3070 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 500W (Tesla M40 24GB). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 242mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Tesla M40 24GB |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 220W-12% | 250W |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 500W-23% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 242mm | 267mm |
| Height | 112mm | 112mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C-12% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 100.8+137% | 42.6 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3070 launched at $499 MSRP, while the Tesla M40 24GB launched at $2000. The GeForce RTX 3070 costs 75% less ($1501 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 44.4 (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 5.3 (Tesla M40 24GB) — the GeForce RTX 3070 offers 737.7% better value. The GeForce RTX 3070 is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2015).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Tesla M40 24GB |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $499-75% | $2000 |
| Performance per Dollar | 44.4+738% | 5.3 |
| Codename | GA104 | GM200 |
| Release | September 1 2020 | November 10 2015 |
| Ranking | #63 | #253 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












