
GeForce RTX 3070
Popular choices:

RTX 4500 Ada Generation
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 3070
2020Why buy it
- ✅Costs $1,751 less on MSRP ($499 MSRP vs $2,250 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 259% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.4 vs 12.4 G3D/$ ($499 MSRP vs $2,250 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅Measures 242mm instead of 267mm, a 25mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than RTX 4500 Ada Generation across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 24 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (184 vs 240), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: RTX 4500 Ada Generation is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
RTX 4500 Ada Generation
2023Why buy it
- ✅32.2% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅30.4% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (240 vs 184).
- ✅200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (24 GB vs 8 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌350.9% HIGHER MSRP$2,250 MSRPvs$499 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 12.4 vs 44.4 G3D/$ ($2,250 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
- ❌10.3% longer card at 267mm vs 242mm.
GeForce RTX 3070
2020RTX 4500 Ada Generation
2023Why buy it
- ✅Costs $1,751 less on MSRP ($499 MSRP vs $2,250 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 259% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.4 vs 12.4 G3D/$ ($499 MSRP vs $2,250 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅Measures 242mm instead of 267mm, a 25mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Why buy it
- ✅32.2% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅30.4% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (240 vs 184).
- ✅200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (24 GB vs 8 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than RTX 4500 Ada Generation across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 24 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (184 vs 240), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: RTX 4500 Ada Generation is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
Trade-offs
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌350.9% HIGHER MSRP$2,250 MSRPvs$499 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 12.4 vs 44.4 G3D/$ ($2,250 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
- ❌10.3% longer card at 267mm vs 242mm.
Quick Answers
So, is RTX 4500 Ada Generation better than GeForce RTX 3070?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is GeForce RTX 3070 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3070 | RTX 4500 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 158 FPS | 225 FPS |
| medium | 140 FPS | 209 FPS |
| high | 123 FPS | 183 FPS |
| ultra | 104 FPS | 167 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 134 FPS | 203 FPS |
| medium | 109 FPS | 171 FPS |
| high | 96 FPS | 142 FPS |
| ultra | 86 FPS | 133 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 80 FPS | 137 FPS |
| medium | 67 FPS | 115 FPS |
| high | 52 FPS | 94 FPS |
| ultra | 45 FPS | 87 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3070 | RTX 4500 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 470 FPS | 671 FPS |
| medium | 405 FPS | 545 FPS |
| high | 327 FPS | 398 FPS |
| ultra | 277 FPS | 343 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 294 FPS | 499 FPS |
| medium | 246 FPS | 404 FPS |
| high | 213 FPS | 321 FPS |
| ultra | 179 FPS | 263 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 141 FPS | 269 FPS |
| medium | 120 FPS | 224 FPS |
| high | 105 FPS | 199 FPS |
| ultra | 83 FPS | 167 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3070 | RTX 4500 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 885 FPS | 931 FPS |
| medium | 712 FPS | 751 FPS |
| high | 619 FPS | 661 FPS |
| ultra | 499 FPS | 572 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 692 FPS | 721 FPS |
| medium | 557 FPS | 580 FPS |
| high | 473 FPS | 499 FPS |
| ultra | 374 FPS | 427 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 479 FPS | 499 FPS |
| medium | 388 FPS | 402 FPS |
| high | 330 FPS | 352 FPS |
| ultra | 249 FPS | 296 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3070 | RTX 4500 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 600 FPS | 914 FPS |
| medium | 527 FPS | 763 FPS |
| high | 433 FPS | 693 FPS |
| ultra | 385 FPS | 617 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 489 FPS | 719 FPS |
| medium | 433 FPS | 598 FPS |
| high | 339 FPS | 526 FPS |
| ultra | 297 FPS | 464 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 292 FPS | 486 FPS |
| medium | 270 FPS | 417 FPS |
| high | 238 FPS | 374 FPS |
| ultra | 200 FPS | 313 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3070 and RTX 4500 Ada Generation

GeForce RTX 3070
GeForce RTX 3070
The GeForce RTX 3070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 1 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1500 MHz to 1725 MHz. It has 5888 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 220W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,172 points. Launch price was $499.

RTX 4500 Ada Generation
RTX 4500 Ada Generation
The RTX 4500 Ada Generation is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 9 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2070 MHz to 2580 MHz. It has 7680 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 210W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 60 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 27,850 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3070 scores 22,172 versus the RTX 4500 Ada Generation's 27,850 — the RTX 4500 Ada Generation leads by 25.6%. The GeForce RTX 3070 is built on Ampere while the RTX 4500 Ada Generation uses Ada Lovelace, both on 8 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 5,888 (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 7,680 (RTX 4500 Ada Generation). Raw compute: 20.31 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 39.63 TFLOPS (RTX 4500 Ada Generation). Boost clocks: 1725 MHz vs 2580 MHz. Ray tracing: 46 RT cores (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 60 (RTX 4500 Ada Generation) with 184 Tensor cores vs 240.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | RTX 4500 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 22,172 | 27,850+26% |
| Architecture | Ampere | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 5888 | 7680+30% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 20.31 TFLOPS | 39.63 TFLOPS+95% |
| Boost Clock | 1725 MHz | 2580 MHz+50% |
| ROPs | 96+20% | 80 |
| TMUs | 184 | 240+30% |
| L1 Cache | 5.8 MB | 7.5 MB+29% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 48 MB+1100% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 46 | 60+30% |
| Tensor Cores | 184 | 240+30% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The RTX 4500 Ada Generation supports the newer Upscaling support, whereas the GeForce RTX 3070 is capped at DLSS 2 Super Resolution.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | RTX 4500 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3070 comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the RTX 4500 Ada Generation has 24 GB. The RTX 4500 Ada Generation offers 200% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 48 MB (RTX 4500 Ada Generation) — the RTX 4500 Ada Generation has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | RTX 4500 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 24 GB+200% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 448 GB/s | 448 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+33% | 192-bit |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 48 MB+1100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 12.2 (RTX 4500 Ada Generation). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | RTX 4500 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.4+8% | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 7th gen (GeForce RTX 3070) vs NVENC 8th Gen (RTX 4500 Ada Generation). Decoder: NVDEC 5th gen vs NVDEC 5th Gen. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 (GeForce RTX 3070) vs AV1,HEVC,H.264,VP9 (RTX 4500 Ada Generation).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | RTX 4500 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 7th gen | NVENC 8th Gen |
| Decoder | NVDEC 5th gen | NVDEC 5th Gen |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 | AV1,HEVC,H.264,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3070 draws 220W versus the RTX 4500 Ada Generation's 210W — a 4.7% difference. The RTX 4500 Ada Generation is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 650W (RTX 4500 Ada Generation). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 242mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | RTX 4500 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 220W | 210W-5% |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 650W |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 242mm | 267mm |
| Height | 112mm | 112mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C-6% | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 100.8 | 132.6+32% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3070 launched at $499 MSRP, while the RTX 4500 Ada Generation launched at $2250. The GeForce RTX 3070 costs 77.8% less ($1751 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 44.4 (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 12.4 (RTX 4500 Ada Generation) — the GeForce RTX 3070 offers 258.1% better value. The RTX 4500 Ada Generation is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2020).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | RTX 4500 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $499-78% | $2250 |
| Performance per Dollar | 44.4+258% | 12.4 |
| Codename | GA104 | AD103 |
| Release | September 1 2020 | August 9 2023 |
| Ranking | #63 | #27 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












