
GeForce RTX 3070
Popular choices:

RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 3070
2020Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($499 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌100% higher power demand at 220W vs 110W.
RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU
2023Why buy it
- ✅2.8% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 8 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 110W instead of 220W, a 110W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 44.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 3070
2020RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU
2023Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($499 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Why buy it
- ✅2.8% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 8 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 110W instead of 220W, a 110W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌100% higher power demand at 220W vs 110W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 44.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU better than GeForce RTX 3070?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is GeForce RTX 3070 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3070 | RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 158 FPS | 170 FPS |
| medium | 140 FPS | 156 FPS |
| high | 123 FPS | 139 FPS |
| ultra | 104 FPS | 121 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 134 FPS | 143 FPS |
| medium | 109 FPS | 119 FPS |
| high | 96 FPS | 103 FPS |
| ultra | 86 FPS | 94 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 80 FPS | 84 FPS |
| medium | 67 FPS | 72 FPS |
| high | 52 FPS | 56 FPS |
| ultra | 45 FPS | 50 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3070 | RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 470 FPS | 518 FPS |
| medium | 405 FPS | 442 FPS |
| high | 327 FPS | 346 FPS |
| ultra | 277 FPS | 295 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 294 FPS | 347 FPS |
| medium | 246 FPS | 288 FPS |
| high | 213 FPS | 235 FPS |
| ultra | 179 FPS | 197 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 141 FPS | 172 FPS |
| medium | 120 FPS | 145 FPS |
| high | 105 FPS | 126 FPS |
| ultra | 83 FPS | 101 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3070 | RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 885 FPS | 845 FPS |
| medium | 712 FPS | 692 FPS |
| high | 619 FPS | 623 FPS |
| ultra | 499 FPS | 498 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 692 FPS | 662 FPS |
| medium | 557 FPS | 537 FPS |
| high | 473 FPS | 473 FPS |
| ultra | 374 FPS | 373 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 479 FPS | 447 FPS |
| medium | 388 FPS | 362 FPS |
| high | 330 FPS | 320 FPS |
| ultra | 249 FPS | 249 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3070 | RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 600 FPS | 657 FPS |
| medium | 527 FPS | 569 FPS |
| high | 433 FPS | 492 FPS |
| ultra | 385 FPS | 462 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 489 FPS | 550 FPS |
| medium | 433 FPS | 478 FPS |
| high | 339 FPS | 410 FPS |
| ultra | 297 FPS | 373 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 292 FPS | 345 FPS |
| medium | 270 FPS | 308 FPS |
| high | 238 FPS | 286 FPS |
| ultra | 200 FPS | 249 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3070 and RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU

GeForce RTX 3070
GeForce RTX 3070
The GeForce RTX 3070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 1 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1500 MHz to 1725 MHz. It has 5888 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 220W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,172 points. Launch price was $499.

RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU
RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU
The RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 9 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1500 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 6144 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 110W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 48 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,119 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce RTX 3070 scores 22,172 and the RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU reaches 22,119 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce RTX 3070 is built on Ampere while the RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU uses Ada Lovelace, both on 8 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 5,888 (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 6,144 (RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU). Raw compute: 20.31 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 26.73 TFLOPS (RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU). Boost clocks: 1725 MHz vs 1665 MHz. Ray tracing: 46 RT cores (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 48 (RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU) with 184 Tensor cores vs 192.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 22,172 | 22,119 |
| Architecture | Ampere | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 5888 | 6144+4% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 20.31 TFLOPS | 26.73 TFLOPS+32% |
| Boost Clock | 1725 MHz+4% | 1665 MHz |
| ROPs | 96+50% | 64 |
| TMUs | 184 | 192+4% |
| L1 Cache | 5.8 MB | 6 MB+3% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 48 MB+1100% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 46 | 48+4% |
| Tensor Cores | 184 | 192+4% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The GeForce RTX 3070 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU supports the newer DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution, whereas the GeForce RTX 3070 is capped at DLSS 2 Super Resolution.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | Yes (DLSS 3.5) |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3070 comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU has 12 GB. The RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 448 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 432 GB/s (RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU) — a 3.7% advantage for the GeForce RTX 3070. Bus width: 256-bit vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 48 MB (RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU) — the RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 12 GB+50% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 448 GB/s+4% | 432 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+33% | 192-bit |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 48 MB+1100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 12 Ultimate (RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.4+8% | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 7th gen (GeForce RTX 3070) vs NVENC 8th Gen (RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU). Decoder: NVDEC 5th gen vs NVDEC 5th Gen. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 (GeForce RTX 3070) vs AV1,H.265,H.264 (RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 7th gen | NVENC 8th Gen |
| Decoder | NVDEC 5th gen | NVDEC 5th Gen |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 | AV1,H.265,H.264 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3070 draws 220W versus the RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU's 110W — a 66.7% difference. The RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 150W (RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU). Power connectors: 8-pin vs Mobile. Card length: 242mm vs 241mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 85.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 220W | 110W-50% |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 150W-77% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | Mobile |
| Length | 242mm | 241mm |
| Height | 112mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C-12% | 85 |
| Perf/Watt | 100.8 | 201.1+100% |
Value Analysis
The RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2020).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $499 | — |
| Codename | GA104 | AD104 |
| Release | September 1 2020 | August 9 2023 |
| Ranking | #63 | #47 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












