
GeForce RTX 3070
Popular choices:

RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 3070
2020Why buy it
- ✅12.7% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($499 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (22,172 vs 25,267).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌91.3% higher power demand at 220W vs 115W.
- ❌130.5% longer card at 242mm vs 105mm.
RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU
2023Why buy it
- ✅+14% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 8 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 115W instead of 220W, a 105W reduction.
- ✅Measures 105mm instead of 242mm, a 137mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3070 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 44.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 3070
2020RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU
2023Why buy it
- ✅12.7% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($499 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
Why buy it
- ✅+14% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 8 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 115W instead of 220W, a 105W reduction.
- ✅Measures 105mm instead of 242mm, a 137mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (22,172 vs 25,267).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌91.3% higher power demand at 220W vs 115W.
- ❌130.5% longer card at 242mm vs 105mm.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3070 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 44.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 3070 better than RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU make more sense than GeForce RTX 3070?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3070 | RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 158 FPS | 141 FPS |
| medium | 140 FPS | 122 FPS |
| high | 123 FPS | 104 FPS |
| ultra | 104 FPS | 73 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 134 FPS | 113 FPS |
| medium | 109 FPS | 94 FPS |
| high | 96 FPS | 73 FPS |
| ultra | 86 FPS | 51 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 80 FPS | 50 FPS |
| medium | 67 FPS | 44 FPS |
| high | 52 FPS | 32 FPS |
| ultra | 45 FPS | 27 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3070 | RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 470 FPS | 370 FPS |
| medium | 405 FPS | 316 FPS |
| high | 327 FPS | 250 FPS |
| ultra | 277 FPS | 213 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 294 FPS | 277 FPS |
| medium | 246 FPS | 230 FPS |
| high | 213 FPS | 182 FPS |
| ultra | 179 FPS | 146 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 141 FPS | 130 FPS |
| medium | 120 FPS | 111 FPS |
| high | 105 FPS | 92 FPS |
| ultra | 83 FPS | 68 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3070 | RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 885 FPS | 826 FPS |
| medium | 712 FPS | 679 FPS |
| high | 619 FPS | 612 FPS |
| ultra | 499 FPS | 538 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 692 FPS | 628 FPS |
| medium | 557 FPS | 510 FPS |
| high | 473 FPS | 451 FPS |
| ultra | 374 FPS | 391 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 479 FPS | 405 FPS |
| medium | 388 FPS | 323 FPS |
| high | 330 FPS | 264 FPS |
| ultra | 249 FPS | 209 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3070 | RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 600 FPS | 287 FPS |
| medium | 527 FPS | 248 FPS |
| high | 433 FPS | 205 FPS |
| ultra | 385 FPS | 179 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 489 FPS | 228 FPS |
| medium | 433 FPS | 200 FPS |
| high | 339 FPS | 167 FPS |
| ultra | 297 FPS | 142 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 292 FPS | 140 FPS |
| medium | 270 FPS | 118 FPS |
| high | 238 FPS | 95 FPS |
| ultra | 200 FPS | 78 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3070 and RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU

GeForce RTX 3070
GeForce RTX 3070
The GeForce RTX 3070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 1 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1500 MHz to 1725 MHz. It has 5888 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 220W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,172 points. Launch price was $499.

RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU
RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU
The RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 21 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 975 MHz to 1500 MHz. It has 5120 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 115W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 40 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 25,267 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3070 scores 22,172 versus the RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU's 25,267 — the RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU leads by 14%. The GeForce RTX 3070 is built on Ampere while the RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU uses Ada Lovelace, both on 8 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 5,888 (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 5,120 (RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU). Raw compute: 20.31 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 15.82 TFLOPS (RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU). Boost clocks: 1725 MHz vs 1500 MHz. Ray tracing: 46 RT cores (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 40 (RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU) with 184 Tensor cores vs 160.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 22,172 | 25,267+14% |
| Architecture | Ampere | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 5888+15% | 5120 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 20.31 TFLOPS+28% | 15.82 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1725 MHz+15% | 1500 MHz |
| ROPs | 96+50% | 64 |
| TMUs | 184+15% | 160 |
| L1 Cache | 5.8 MB+16% | 5 MB |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 48 MB+1100% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 46+15% | 40 |
| Tensor Cores | 184+15% | 160 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU supports the newer Upscaling support, whereas the GeForce RTX 3070 is capped at DLSS 2 Super Resolution.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3070 comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU has 12 GB. The RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 448 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 432 GB/s (RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU) — a 3.7% advantage for the GeForce RTX 3070. Bus width: 256-bit vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 48 MB (RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU) — the RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 12 GB+50% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 448 GB/s+4% | 432 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+33% | 192-bit |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 48 MB+1100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 12 Ultimate (12_2) (RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
| Vulkan | 1.4+8% | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 7th gen (GeForce RTX 3070) vs NVENC 8th Gen (RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU). Decoder: NVDEC 5th gen vs NVDEC 5th Gen. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 (GeForce RTX 3070) vs H.264,H.265,AV1 (RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 7th gen | NVENC 8th Gen |
| Decoder | NVDEC 5th gen | NVDEC 5th Gen |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 | H.264,H.265,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3070 draws 220W versus the RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU's 115W — a 62.7% difference. The RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 650W (RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 242mm vs 105mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 85.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 220W | 115W-48% |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 650W |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 242mm | 105mm |
| Height | 112mm | 82mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C-12% | 85 |
| Perf/Watt | 100.8 | 219.7+118% |
Value Analysis
The RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2020).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $499 | — |
| Codename | GA104 | AD104 |
| Release | September 1 2020 | March 21 2023 |
| Ranking | #63 | #81 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












