
GeForce RTX 3070
Popular choices:

Radeon R9 Fury
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 3070
2020Why buy it
- ✅+132.9% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $50 less on MSRP ($499 MSRP vs $549 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 156.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.4 vs 17.3 G3D/$ ($499 MSRP vs $549 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌24.1% longer card at 242mm vs 195mm.
Radeon R9 Fury
2015Why buy it
- ✅Measures 195mm instead of 242mm, a 47mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (9,521 vs 22,172).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌10% HIGHER MSRP$549 MSRPvs$499 MSRP
GeForce RTX 3070
2020Radeon R9 Fury
2015Why buy it
- ✅+132.9% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $50 less on MSRP ($499 MSRP vs $549 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 156.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.4 vs 17.3 G3D/$ ($499 MSRP vs $549 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
Why buy it
- ✅Measures 195mm instead of 242mm, a 47mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌24.1% longer card at 242mm vs 195mm.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (9,521 vs 22,172).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌10% HIGHER MSRP$549 MSRPvs$499 MSRP
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 3070 better than Radeon R9 Fury?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon R9 Fury still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3070 | Radeon R9 Fury |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 158 FPS | 117 FPS |
| medium | 140 FPS | 104 FPS |
| high | 123 FPS | 85 FPS |
| ultra | 104 FPS | 52 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 134 FPS | 98 FPS |
| medium | 109 FPS | 86 FPS |
| high | 96 FPS | 63 FPS |
| ultra | 86 FPS | 38 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 80 FPS | 34 FPS |
| medium | 67 FPS | 31 FPS |
| high | 52 FPS | 23 FPS |
| ultra | 45 FPS | 20 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3070 | Radeon R9 Fury |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 470 FPS | 261 FPS |
| medium | 405 FPS | 219 FPS |
| high | 327 FPS | 173 FPS |
| ultra | 277 FPS | 143 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 294 FPS | 186 FPS |
| medium | 246 FPS | 151 FPS |
| high | 213 FPS | 125 FPS |
| ultra | 179 FPS | 98 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 141 FPS | 101 FPS |
| medium | 120 FPS | 81 FPS |
| high | 105 FPS | 65 FPS |
| ultra | 83 FPS | 49 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3070 | Radeon R9 Fury |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 885 FPS | 428 FPS |
| medium | 712 FPS | 343 FPS |
| high | 619 FPS | 286 FPS |
| ultra | 499 FPS | 214 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 692 FPS | 321 FPS |
| medium | 557 FPS | 257 FPS |
| high | 473 FPS | 214 FPS |
| ultra | 374 FPS | 161 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 479 FPS | 214 FPS |
| medium | 388 FPS | 171 FPS |
| high | 330 FPS | 143 FPS |
| ultra | 249 FPS | 107 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3070 | Radeon R9 Fury |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 600 FPS | 197 FPS |
| medium | 527 FPS | 164 FPS |
| high | 433 FPS | 148 FPS |
| ultra | 385 FPS | 117 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 489 FPS | 137 FPS |
| medium | 433 FPS | 118 FPS |
| high | 339 FPS | 107 FPS |
| ultra | 297 FPS | 85 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 292 FPS | 82 FPS |
| medium | 270 FPS | 68 FPS |
| high | 238 FPS | 56 FPS |
| ultra | 200 FPS | 42 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3070 and Radeon R9 Fury

GeForce RTX 3070
GeForce RTX 3070
The GeForce RTX 3070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 1 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1500 MHz to 1725 MHz. It has 5888 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 220W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,172 points. Launch price was $499.

Radeon R9 Fury
Radeon R9 Fury
The Radeon R9 Fury is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 10 2015. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1000 MHz. It has 3584 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 275W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,521 points. Launch price was $549.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3070 scores 22,172 versus the Radeon R9 Fury's 9,521 — the GeForce RTX 3070 leads by 132.9%. The GeForce RTX 3070 is built on Ampere while the Radeon R9 Fury uses GCN 3.0, both on 8 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 5,888 (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 3,584 (Radeon R9 Fury). Raw compute: 20.31 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 7.168 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 Fury). Boost clocks: 1725 MHz vs 1000 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Radeon R9 Fury |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 22,172+133% | 9,521 |
| Architecture | Ampere | GCN 3.0 |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 5888+64% | 3584 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 20.31 TFLOPS+183% | 7.168 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1725 MHz+73% | 1000 MHz |
| ROPs | 96+50% | 64 |
| TMUs | 184 | 224+22% |
| L1 Cache | 5.8 MB+559% | 0.88 MB |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+100% | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3070 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon R9 Fury relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Radeon R9 Fury |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3070 comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R9 Fury has 4 GB. The GeForce RTX 3070 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 448 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 512 GB/s (Radeon R9 Fury) — a 14.3% advantage for the Radeon R9 Fury. Bus width: 256-bit vs 4096-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 2 MB (Radeon R9 Fury) — the GeForce RTX 3070 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Radeon R9 Fury |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB+100% | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | HBM |
| Memory Bandwidth | 448 GB/s | 512 GB/s+14% |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | 4096-bit+1500% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+100% | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 12.0 (Radeon R9 Fury). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.4. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Radeon R9 Fury |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.4+17% | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6+5% | 4.4 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 7th gen (GeForce RTX 3070) vs VCE 3.0 (Radeon R9 Fury). Decoder: NVDEC 5th gen vs UVD 6.0. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 (GeForce RTX 3070) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Radeon R9 Fury).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Radeon R9 Fury |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 7th gen | VCE 3.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC 5th gen | UVD 6.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3070 draws 220W versus the Radeon R9 Fury's 275W — a 22.2% difference. The GeForce RTX 3070 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 600W (Radeon R9 Fury). Power connectors: 8-pin vs 2x 8-pin. Card length: 242mm vs 195mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 65°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Radeon R9 Fury |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 220W-20% | 275W |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 600W-8% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | 2x 8-pin |
| Length | 242mm | 195mm |
| Height | 112mm | 115mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | 65°C-13% |
| Perf/Watt | 100.8+191% | 34.6 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3070 launched at $499 MSRP, while the Radeon R9 Fury launched at $549. The GeForce RTX 3070 costs 9.1% less ($50 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 44.4 (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 17.3 (Radeon R9 Fury) — the GeForce RTX 3070 offers 156.6% better value. The GeForce RTX 3070 is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2015).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Radeon R9 Fury |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $499-9% | $549 |
| Performance per Dollar | 44.4+157% | 17.3 |
| Codename | GA104 | Fiji |
| Release | September 1 2020 | July 10 2015 |
| Ranking | #63 | #274 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












