
GeForce RTX 3070
Popular choices:

Radeon Pro Vega 48
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 3070
2020Why buy it
- ✅+96.7% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Delivers 77.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.4 vs 25.0 G3D/$ ($499 MSRP vs $450 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs Unknown).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌633.3% higher power demand at 220W vs 30W.
Radeon Pro Vega 48
2019Why buy it
- ✅Costs $49 less on MSRP ($450 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 30W instead of 220W, a 190W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (11,270 vs 22,172).
- ❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2019-era hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 25.0 vs 44.4 G3D/$ ($450 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 3070
2020Radeon Pro Vega 48
2019Why buy it
- ✅+96.7% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Delivers 77.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.4 vs 25.0 G3D/$ ($499 MSRP vs $450 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs Unknown).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $49 less on MSRP ($450 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 30W instead of 220W, a 190W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌633.3% higher power demand at 220W vs 30W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (11,270 vs 22,172).
- ❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2019-era hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 25.0 vs 44.4 G3D/$ ($450 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 3070 better than Radeon Pro Vega 48?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon Pro Vega 48 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3070 | Radeon Pro Vega 48 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 158 FPS | 121 FPS |
| medium | 140 FPS | 107 FPS |
| high | 123 FPS | 90 FPS |
| ultra | 104 FPS | 55 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 134 FPS | 101 FPS |
| medium | 109 FPS | 88 FPS |
| high | 96 FPS | 67 FPS |
| ultra | 86 FPS | 41 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 80 FPS | 35 FPS |
| medium | 67 FPS | 32 FPS |
| high | 52 FPS | 24 FPS |
| ultra | 45 FPS | 21 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3070 | Radeon Pro Vega 48 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 470 FPS | 237 FPS |
| medium | 405 FPS | 200 FPS |
| high | 327 FPS | 158 FPS |
| ultra | 277 FPS | 126 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 294 FPS | 168 FPS |
| medium | 246 FPS | 140 FPS |
| high | 213 FPS | 114 FPS |
| ultra | 179 FPS | 90 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 141 FPS | 97 FPS |
| medium | 120 FPS | 78 FPS |
| high | 105 FPS | 66 FPS |
| ultra | 83 FPS | 50 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3070 | Radeon Pro Vega 48 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 885 FPS | 507 FPS |
| medium | 712 FPS | 406 FPS |
| high | 619 FPS | 338 FPS |
| ultra | 499 FPS | 254 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 692 FPS | 380 FPS |
| medium | 557 FPS | 304 FPS |
| high | 473 FPS | 254 FPS |
| ultra | 374 FPS | 190 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 479 FPS | 254 FPS |
| medium | 388 FPS | 203 FPS |
| high | 330 FPS | 169 FPS |
| ultra | 249 FPS | 127 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3070 | Radeon Pro Vega 48 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 600 FPS | 205 FPS |
| medium | 527 FPS | 168 FPS |
| high | 433 FPS | 148 FPS |
| ultra | 385 FPS | 116 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 489 FPS | 142 FPS |
| medium | 433 FPS | 121 FPS |
| high | 339 FPS | 105 FPS |
| ultra | 297 FPS | 83 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 292 FPS | 83 FPS |
| medium | 270 FPS | 69 FPS |
| high | 238 FPS | 56 FPS |
| ultra | 200 FPS | 42 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3070 and Radeon Pro Vega 48

GeForce RTX 3070
GeForce RTX 3070
The GeForce RTX 3070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 1 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1500 MHz to 1725 MHz. It has 5888 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 220W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,172 points. Launch price was $499.

Radeon Pro Vega 48
Radeon Pro Vega 48
The Radeon Pro Vega 48 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 19 2019. It features the GCN 5.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1200 MHz to 1300 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,270 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3070 scores 22,172 versus the Radeon Pro Vega 48's 11,270 — the GeForce RTX 3070 leads by 96.7%. The GeForce RTX 3070 is built on Ampere while the Radeon Pro Vega 48 uses GCN 5.0, both on 8 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 5,888 (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 3,072 (Radeon Pro Vega 48). Raw compute: 20.31 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 7.987 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro Vega 48). Boost clocks: 1725 MHz vs 1300 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Radeon Pro Vega 48 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 22,172+97% | 11,270 |
| Architecture | Ampere | GCN 5.0 |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 5888+92% | 3072 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 20.31 TFLOPS+154% | 7.987 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1725 MHz+33% | 1300 MHz |
| ROPs | 96+50% | 64 |
| TMUs | 184 | 192+4% |
| L1 Cache | 5.8 MB+673% | 0.75 MB |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 4 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3070 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon Pro Vega 48 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Radeon Pro Vega 48 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3070 comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro Vega 48 has 0 MB. The GeForce RTX 3070 offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Radeon Pro Vega 48 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | Shared System RAM |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+100% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 4 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 12.1 (Radeon Pro Vega 48). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Radeon Pro Vega 48 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.4+8% | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 7th gen (GeForce RTX 3070) vs VCE 4.0 (Radeon Pro Vega 48). Decoder: NVDEC 5th gen vs UVD 7.0. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 (GeForce RTX 3070) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon Pro Vega 48).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Radeon Pro Vega 48 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 7th gen | VCE 4.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC 5th gen | UVD 7.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3070 draws 220W versus the Radeon Pro Vega 48's 30W — a 152% difference. The Radeon Pro Vega 48 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 1W (Radeon Pro Vega 48). Power connectors: 8-pin vs Integrated. Card length: 242mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Radeon Pro Vega 48 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 220W | 30W-86% |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 1W-100% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | Integrated |
| Length | 242mm | 0mm |
| Height | 112mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C-12% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 100.8 | 375.7+273% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3070 launched at $499 MSRP, while the Radeon Pro Vega 48 launched at $450. The Radeon Pro Vega 48 costs 9.8% less ($49 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 44.4 (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 25.0 (Radeon Pro Vega 48) — the GeForce RTX 3070 offers 77.6% better value. The GeForce RTX 3070 is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2019).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Radeon Pro Vega 48 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $499 | $450-10% |
| Performance per Dollar | 44.4+78% | 25.0 |
| Codename | GA104 | Vega 10 |
| Release | September 1 2020 | March 19 2019 |
| Ranking | #63 | #241 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












