
GeForce RTX 3070
Popular choices:

Radeon Pro 5600M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 3070
2020Why buy it
- ✅+137.8% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($499 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌340% higher power demand at 220W vs 50W.
Radeon Pro 5600M
2020Why buy it
- ✅Draws 50W instead of 220W, a 170W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (9,324 vs 22,172).
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 3070 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 44.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 3070
2020Radeon Pro 5600M
2020Why buy it
- ✅+137.8% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($499 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 50W instead of 220W, a 170W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌340% higher power demand at 220W vs 50W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (9,324 vs 22,172).
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 3070 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 44.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 3070 better than Radeon Pro 5600M?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon Pro 5600M still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3070 | Radeon Pro 5600M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 158 FPS | 130 FPS |
| medium | 140 FPS | 113 FPS |
| high | 123 FPS | 90 FPS |
| ultra | 104 FPS | 55 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 134 FPS | 112 FPS |
| medium | 109 FPS | 95 FPS |
| high | 96 FPS | 68 FPS |
| ultra | 86 FPS | 41 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 80 FPS | 40 FPS |
| medium | 67 FPS | 37 FPS |
| high | 52 FPS | 23 FPS |
| ultra | 45 FPS | 19 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3070 | Radeon Pro 5600M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 470 FPS | 186 FPS |
| medium | 405 FPS | 150 FPS |
| high | 327 FPS | 106 FPS |
| ultra | 277 FPS | 79 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 294 FPS | 126 FPS |
| medium | 246 FPS | 98 FPS |
| high | 213 FPS | 74 FPS |
| ultra | 179 FPS | 54 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 141 FPS | 68 FPS |
| medium | 120 FPS | 54 FPS |
| high | 105 FPS | 44 FPS |
| ultra | 83 FPS | 31 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3070 | Radeon Pro 5600M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 885 FPS | 420 FPS |
| medium | 712 FPS | 336 FPS |
| high | 619 FPS | 280 FPS |
| ultra | 499 FPS | 210 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 692 FPS | 315 FPS |
| medium | 557 FPS | 252 FPS |
| high | 473 FPS | 210 FPS |
| ultra | 374 FPS | 157 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 479 FPS | 210 FPS |
| medium | 388 FPS | 168 FPS |
| high | 330 FPS | 140 FPS |
| ultra | 249 FPS | 105 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3070 | Radeon Pro 5600M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 600 FPS | 250 FPS |
| medium | 527 FPS | 216 FPS |
| high | 433 FPS | 183 FPS |
| ultra | 385 FPS | 145 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 489 FPS | 192 FPS |
| medium | 433 FPS | 170 FPS |
| high | 339 FPS | 138 FPS |
| ultra | 297 FPS | 107 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 292 FPS | 106 FPS |
| medium | 270 FPS | 86 FPS |
| high | 238 FPS | 72 FPS |
| ultra | 200 FPS | 55 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3070 and Radeon Pro 5600M

GeForce RTX 3070
GeForce RTX 3070
The GeForce RTX 3070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 1 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1500 MHz to 1725 MHz. It has 5888 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 220W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,172 points. Launch price was $499.

Radeon Pro 5600M
Radeon Pro 5600M
The Radeon Pro 5600M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 15 2020. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1030 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,324 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3070 scores 22,172 versus the Radeon Pro 5600M's 9,324 — the GeForce RTX 3070 leads by 137.8%. The GeForce RTX 3070 is built on Ampere while the Radeon Pro 5600M uses RDNA 1.0, both on 8 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 5,888 (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 2,560 (Radeon Pro 5600M). Raw compute: 20.31 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 5.274 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro 5600M). Boost clocks: 1725 MHz vs 1030 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Radeon Pro 5600M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 22,172+138% | 9,324 |
| Architecture | Ampere | RDNA 1.0 |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 5888+130% | 2560 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 20.31 TFLOPS+285% | 5.274 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1725 MHz+67% | 1030 MHz |
| ROPs | 96+50% | 64 |
| TMUs | 184+15% | 160 |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 4 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3070 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon Pro 5600M relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Radeon Pro 5600M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 8 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 256-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Radeon Pro 5600M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+100% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 4 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 12.1 (Radeon Pro 5600M). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Radeon Pro 5600M |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.4+8% | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 7th gen (GeForce RTX 3070) vs VCN 2.0 (Radeon Pro 5600M). Decoder: NVDEC 5th gen vs VCN 2.0. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 (GeForce RTX 3070) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon Pro 5600M).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Radeon Pro 5600M |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 7th gen | VCN 2.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC 5th gen | VCN 2.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3070 draws 220W versus the Radeon Pro 5600M's 50W — a 125.9% difference. The Radeon Pro 5600M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 500W (Radeon Pro 5600M). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 242mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 90°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Radeon Pro 5600M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 220W | 50W-77% |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 500W-23% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 242mm | 0mm |
| Height | 112mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C-17% | 90°C |
| Perf/Watt | 100.8 | 186.5+85% |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












