
GeForce RTX 3070
Popular choices:

Radeon Pro 5300
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 3070
2020Why buy it
- ✅246.1% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 87.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.4 vs 23.8 G3D/$ ($499 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌158.8% higher power demand at 220W vs 85W.
Radeon Pro 5300
2020Why buy it
- ✅Costs $199 less on MSRP ($300 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 85W instead of 220W, a 135W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3070 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 3070 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 23.8 vs 44.4 G3D/$ ($300 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 3070
2020Radeon Pro 5300
2020Why buy it
- ✅246.1% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 87.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.4 vs 23.8 G3D/$ ($499 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $199 less on MSRP ($300 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 85W instead of 220W, a 135W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌158.8% higher power demand at 220W vs 85W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3070 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 3070 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 23.8 vs 44.4 G3D/$ ($300 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 3070 better than Radeon Pro 5300?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon Pro 5300 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3070 | Radeon Pro 5300 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 158 FPS | 78 FPS |
| medium | 140 FPS | 68 FPS |
| high | 123 FPS | 54 FPS |
| ultra | 104 FPS | 36 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 134 FPS | 71 FPS |
| medium | 109 FPS | 61 FPS |
| high | 96 FPS | 44 FPS |
| ultra | 86 FPS | 28 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 80 FPS | 26 FPS |
| medium | 67 FPS | 24 FPS |
| high | 52 FPS | 16 FPS |
| ultra | 45 FPS | 14 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3070 | Radeon Pro 5300 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 470 FPS | 118 FPS |
| medium | 405 FPS | 82 FPS |
| high | 327 FPS | 56 FPS |
| ultra | 277 FPS | 37 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 294 FPS | 78 FPS |
| medium | 246 FPS | 47 FPS |
| high | 213 FPS | 34 FPS |
| ultra | 179 FPS | 25 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 141 FPS | 37 FPS |
| medium | 120 FPS | 25 FPS |
| high | 105 FPS | 20 FPS |
| ultra | 83 FPS | 14 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3070 | Radeon Pro 5300 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 885 FPS | 321 FPS |
| medium | 712 FPS | 256 FPS |
| high | 619 FPS | 214 FPS |
| ultra | 499 FPS | 160 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 692 FPS | 240 FPS |
| medium | 557 FPS | 192 FPS |
| high | 473 FPS | 160 FPS |
| ultra | 374 FPS | 120 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 479 FPS | 157 FPS |
| medium | 388 FPS | 128 FPS |
| high | 330 FPS | 91 FPS |
| ultra | 249 FPS | 62 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3070 | Radeon Pro 5300 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 600 FPS | 141 FPS |
| medium | 527 FPS | 113 FPS |
| high | 433 FPS | 97 FPS |
| ultra | 385 FPS | 80 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 489 FPS | 104 FPS |
| medium | 433 FPS | 85 FPS |
| high | 339 FPS | 73 FPS |
| ultra | 297 FPS | 59 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 292 FPS | 59 FPS |
| medium | 270 FPS | 47 FPS |
| high | 238 FPS | 38 FPS |
| ultra | 200 FPS | 29 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3070 and Radeon Pro 5300

GeForce RTX 3070
GeForce RTX 3070
The GeForce RTX 3070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 1 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1500 MHz to 1725 MHz. It has 5888 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 220W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,172 points. Launch price was $499.

Radeon Pro 5300
Radeon Pro 5300
The Radeon Pro 5300 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 4 2020. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1650 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 85W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,125 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3070 scores 22,172 versus the Radeon Pro 5300's 7,125 — the GeForce RTX 3070 leads by 211.2%. The GeForce RTX 3070 is built on Ampere while the Radeon Pro 5300 uses RDNA 1.0, both on 8 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 5,888 (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 1,280 (Radeon Pro 5300). Raw compute: 20.31 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 4.224 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro 5300). Boost clocks: 1725 MHz vs 1650 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Radeon Pro 5300 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 22,172+211% | 7,125 |
| Architecture | Ampere | RDNA 1.0 |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 5888+360% | 1280 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 20.31 TFLOPS+381% | 4.224 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1725 MHz+5% | 1650 MHz |
| ROPs | 96+200% | 32 |
| TMUs | 184+130% | 80 |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+100% | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3070 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon Pro 5300 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Radeon Pro 5300 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3070 comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro 5300 has 4 GB. The GeForce RTX 3070 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 2 MB (Radeon Pro 5300) — the GeForce RTX 3070 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Radeon Pro 5300 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB+100% | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+100% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+100% | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 12.1 (Radeon Pro 5300). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Radeon Pro 5300 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.4 | 1.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 7th gen (GeForce RTX 3070) vs VCN 2.0 (Radeon Pro 5300). Decoder: NVDEC 5th gen vs VCN 2.0. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 (GeForce RTX 3070) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon Pro 5300).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Radeon Pro 5300 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 7th gen | VCN 2.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC 5th gen | VCN 2.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3070 draws 220W versus the Radeon Pro 5300's 85W — a 88.5% difference. The Radeon Pro 5300 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 350W (Radeon Pro 5300). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 242mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Radeon Pro 5300 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 220W | 85W-61% |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 350W-46% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 242mm | 0mm |
| Height | 112mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 100.8+20% | 83.8 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3070 launched at $499 MSRP, while the Radeon Pro 5300 launched at $300. The Radeon Pro 5300 costs 39.9% less ($199 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 44.4 (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 23.8 (Radeon Pro 5300) — the GeForce RTX 3070 offers 86.6% better value.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Radeon Pro 5300 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $499 | $300-40% |
| Performance per Dollar | 44.4+87% | 23.8 |
| Codename | GA104 | Navi 14 |
| Release | September 1 2020 | August 4 2020 |
| Ranking | #63 | #351 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












