
GeForce RTX 3070
Popular choices:

Radeon 8050S
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 3070
2020Why buy it
- ✅+36.4% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs Unknown).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌300% higher power demand at 220W vs 55W.
Radeon 8050S
2025Why buy it
- ✅Costs $99 less on MSRP ($400 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 55W instead of 220W, a 165W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 3.5 on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (16,259 vs 22,172).
- ❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 3070 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
GeForce RTX 3070
2020Radeon 8050S
2025Why buy it
- ✅+36.4% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs Unknown).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $99 less on MSRP ($400 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 55W instead of 220W, a 165W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 3.5 on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌300% higher power demand at 220W vs 55W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (16,259 vs 22,172).
- ❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 3070 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 3070 better than Radeon 8050S?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does Radeon 8050S make more sense than GeForce RTX 3070?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3070 | Radeon 8050S |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 158 FPS | 162 FPS |
| medium | 140 FPS | 153 FPS |
| high | 123 FPS | 128 FPS |
| ultra | 104 FPS | 99 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 134 FPS | 138 FPS |
| medium | 109 FPS | 119 FPS |
| high | 96 FPS | 97 FPS |
| ultra | 86 FPS | 76 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 80 FPS | 66 FPS |
| medium | 67 FPS | 57 FPS |
| high | 52 FPS | 46 FPS |
| ultra | 45 FPS | 42 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3070 | Radeon 8050S |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 470 FPS | 306 FPS |
| medium | 405 FPS | 250 FPS |
| high | 327 FPS | 190 FPS |
| ultra | 277 FPS | 141 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 294 FPS | 195 FPS |
| medium | 246 FPS | 159 FPS |
| high | 213 FPS | 119 FPS |
| ultra | 179 FPS | 84 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 141 FPS | 79 FPS |
| medium | 120 FPS | 63 FPS |
| high | 105 FPS | 53 FPS |
| ultra | 83 FPS | 37 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3070 | Radeon 8050S |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 885 FPS | 584 FPS |
| medium | 712 FPS | 518 FPS |
| high | 619 FPS | 438 FPS |
| ultra | 499 FPS | 366 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 692 FPS | 418 FPS |
| medium | 557 FPS | 368 FPS |
| high | 473 FPS | 315 FPS |
| ultra | 374 FPS | 259 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 479 FPS | 267 FPS |
| medium | 388 FPS | 227 FPS |
| high | 330 FPS | 183 FPS |
| ultra | 249 FPS | 140 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3070 | Radeon 8050S |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 600 FPS | 358 FPS |
| medium | 527 FPS | 281 FPS |
| high | 433 FPS | 244 FPS |
| ultra | 385 FPS | 193 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 489 FPS | 263 FPS |
| medium | 433 FPS | 213 FPS |
| high | 339 FPS | 180 FPS |
| ultra | 297 FPS | 143 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 292 FPS | 153 FPS |
| medium | 270 FPS | 131 FPS |
| high | 238 FPS | 115 FPS |
| ultra | 200 FPS | 90 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3070 and Radeon 8050S

GeForce RTX 3070
GeForce RTX 3070
The GeForce RTX 3070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 1 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1500 MHz to 1725 MHz. It has 5888 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 220W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,172 points. Launch price was $499.

Radeon 8050S
Radeon 8050S
The Radeon 8050S is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 6 2025. It features the RDNA 3.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1295 MHz to 2800 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 55W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 32 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 16,259 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3070 scores 22,172 versus the Radeon 8050S's 16,259 — the GeForce RTX 3070 leads by 36.4%. The GeForce RTX 3070 is built on Ampere while the Radeon 8050S uses RDNA 3.5, both on 8 nm vs 4 nm. Shader units: 5,888 (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 2,048 (Radeon 8050S). Raw compute: 20.31 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 11.47 TFLOPS (Radeon 8050S). Boost clocks: 1725 MHz vs 2800 MHz. Ray tracing: 46 RT cores (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 32 (Radeon 8050S) with 184 Tensor cores.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Radeon 8050S |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 22,172+36% | 16,259 |
| Architecture | Ampere | RDNA 3.5 |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 4 nm |
| Shading Units | 5888+188% | 2048 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 20.31 TFLOPS+77% | 11.47 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1725 MHz | 2800 MHz+62% |
| ROPs | 96+50% | 64 |
| TMUs | 184+44% | 128 |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 8 MB+100% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 46+44% | 32 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3070 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon 8050S relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Radeon 8050S |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3070 comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon 8050S has 0 MB. The GeForce RTX 3070 offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 448 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 256 GB/s (Max) (Radeon 8050S) — a 75% advantage for the GeForce RTX 3070. Bus width: 256-bit vs System Shared. L2 Cache: 4 MB (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 8 MB (Radeon 8050S) — the Radeon 8050S has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Radeon 8050S |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | none |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | LPDDR5X (Shared) |
| Memory Bandwidth | 448 GB/s+75% | 256 GB/s (Max) |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | System Shared |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 8 MB+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 12.2 (Radeon 8050S). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Radeon 8050S |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.4 | 1.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 7th gen (GeForce RTX 3070) vs VCN 4.5 (Radeon 8050S). Decoder: NVDEC 5th gen vs VCN 4.5. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 (GeForce RTX 3070) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon 8050S).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Radeon 8050S |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 7th gen | VCN 4.5 |
| Decoder | NVDEC 5th gen | VCN 4.5 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3070 draws 220W versus the Radeon 8050S's 55W — a 120% difference. The Radeon 8050S is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 650W (Radeon 8050S). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 242mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Radeon 8050S |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 220W | 55W-75% |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 650W |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 242mm | 0mm |
| Height | 112mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C-12% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 100.8 | 295.6+193% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3070 launched at $499 MSRP, while the Radeon 8050S launched at $400. The Radeon 8050S costs 19.8% less ($99 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 44.4 (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 40.6 (Radeon 8050S) — the GeForce RTX 3070 offers 9.4% better value. The Radeon 8050S is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2020).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Radeon 8050S |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $499 | $400-20% |
| Performance per Dollar | 44.4+9% | 40.6 |
| Codename | GA104 | Strix Halo |
| Release | September 1 2020 | January 6 2025 |
| Ranking | #63 | #126 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












