
GeForce RTX 3070
Popular choices:

Quadro P5000 (móvel)
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 3070
2020Why buy it
- ✅123.1% more average FPS across 48 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $2,000 less on MSRP ($499 MSRP vs $2,499 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 1133.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.4 vs 3.6 G3D/$ ($499 MSRP vs $2,499 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌120% higher power demand at 220W vs 100W.
Quadro P5000 (móvel)
2017Why buy it
- ✅Draws 100W instead of 220W, a 120W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3070 across 48 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌400.8% HIGHER MSRP$2,499 MSRPvs$499 MSRP
GeForce RTX 3070
2020Quadro P5000 (móvel)
2017Why buy it
- ✅123.1% more average FPS across 48 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $2,000 less on MSRP ($499 MSRP vs $2,499 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 1133.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.4 vs 3.6 G3D/$ ($499 MSRP vs $2,499 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 100W instead of 220W, a 120W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌120% higher power demand at 220W vs 100W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3070 across 48 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌400.8% HIGHER MSRP$2,499 MSRPvs$499 MSRP
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 3070 better than Quadro P5000 (móvel)?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Quadro P5000 (móvel) still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3070 | Quadro P5000 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 158 FPS | 103 FPS |
| medium | 140 FPS | 94 FPS |
| high | 123 FPS | 79 FPS |
| ultra | 104 FPS | 64 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 134 FPS | 91 FPS |
| medium | 109 FPS | 80 FPS |
| high | 96 FPS | 65 FPS |
| ultra | 86 FPS | 53 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 80 FPS | 41 FPS |
| medium | 67 FPS | 38 FPS |
| high | 52 FPS | 26 FPS |
| ultra | 45 FPS | 23 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3070 | Quadro P5000 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 470 FPS | 221 FPS |
| medium | 405 FPS | 187 FPS |
| high | 327 FPS | 144 FPS |
| ultra | 277 FPS | 117 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 294 FPS | 161 FPS |
| medium | 246 FPS | 135 FPS |
| high | 213 FPS | 109 FPS |
| ultra | 179 FPS | 86 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 141 FPS | 94 FPS |
| medium | 120 FPS | 78 FPS |
| high | 105 FPS | 65 FPS |
| ultra | 83 FPS | 50 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3070 | Quadro P5000 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 885 FPS | 405 FPS |
| medium | 712 FPS | 324 FPS |
| high | 619 FPS | 270 FPS |
| ultra | 499 FPS | 202 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 692 FPS | 304 FPS |
| medium | 557 FPS | 243 FPS |
| high | 473 FPS | 202 FPS |
| ultra | 374 FPS | 152 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 479 FPS | 202 FPS |
| medium | 388 FPS | 162 FPS |
| high | 330 FPS | 135 FPS |
| ultra | 249 FPS | 101 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3070 | Quadro P5000 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 600 FPS | 227 FPS |
| medium | 527 FPS | 181 FPS |
| high | 433 FPS | 156 FPS |
| ultra | 385 FPS | 130 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 489 FPS | 175 FPS |
| medium | 433 FPS | 139 FPS |
| high | 339 FPS | 117 FPS |
| ultra | 297 FPS | 95 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 292 FPS | 93 FPS |
| medium | 270 FPS | 73 FPS |
| high | 238 FPS | 62 FPS |
| ultra | 200 FPS | 50 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3070 and Quadro P5000 (móvel)

GeForce RTX 3070
GeForce RTX 3070
The GeForce RTX 3070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 1 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1500 MHz to 1725 MHz. It has 5888 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 220W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,172 points. Launch price was $499.

Quadro P5000 (móvel)
Quadro P5000 (móvel)
The Quadro P5000 (móvel) is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 11 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1278 MHz to 1582 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,000 points. Launch price was $1,885.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3070 scores 22,172 versus the Quadro P5000 (móvel)'s 9,000 — the GeForce RTX 3070 leads by 146.4%. The GeForce RTX 3070 is built on Ampere while the Quadro P5000 (móvel) uses Pascal, both on 8 nm vs 16 nm. Shader units: 5,888 (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 2,048 (Quadro P5000 (móvel)). Raw compute: 20.31 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 6.48 TFLOPS (Quadro P5000 (móvel)). Boost clocks: 1725 MHz vs 1582 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Quadro P5000 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 22,172+146% | 9,000 |
| Architecture | Ampere | Pascal |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 16 nm |
| Shading Units | 5888+188% | 2048 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 20.31 TFLOPS+213% | 6.48 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1725 MHz+9% | 1582 MHz |
| ROPs | 96+50% | 64 |
| TMUs | 184+44% | 128 |
| L1 Cache | 5.8 MB+673% | 0.75 MB |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+100% | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3070 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Quadro P5000 (móvel) relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Quadro P5000 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3070 comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro P5000 (móvel) has 4 GB. The GeForce RTX 3070 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 2 MB (Quadro P5000 (móvel)) — the GeForce RTX 3070 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Quadro P5000 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB+100% | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | 256-bit |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+100% | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 12.1 (Quadro P5000 (móvel)). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.0. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Quadro P5000 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.4+40% | 1.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 7th gen (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 6th Gen NVENC (Quadro P5000 (móvel)). Decoder: NVDEC 5th gen vs 3rd Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 (GeForce RTX 3070) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Quadro P5000 (móvel)).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Quadro P5000 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 7th gen | 6th Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | NVDEC 5th gen | 3rd Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3070 draws 220W versus the Quadro P5000 (móvel)'s 100W — a 75% difference. The Quadro P5000 (móvel) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 500W (Quadro P5000 (móvel)). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 242mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Quadro P5000 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 220W | 100W-55% |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 500W-23% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 242mm | 267mm |
| Height | 112mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C-6% | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 100.8+12% | 90.0 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3070 launched at $499 MSRP, while the Quadro P5000 (móvel) launched at $2499. The GeForce RTX 3070 costs 80% less ($2000 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 44.4 (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 3.6 (Quadro P5000 (móvel)) — the GeForce RTX 3070 offers 1133.3% better value. The GeForce RTX 3070 is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2017).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Quadro P5000 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $499-80% | $2499 |
| Performance per Dollar | 44.4+1133% | 3.6 |
| Codename | GA104 | GP104 |
| Release | September 1 2020 | January 11 2017 |
| Ranking | #63 | #235 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












