
GeForce RTX 3070
Popular choices:

Quadro M6000
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 3070
2020Why buy it
- ✅+88.4% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $4,500 less on MSRP ($499 MSRP vs $4,999 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 1787.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.4 vs 2.4 G3D/$ ($499 MSRP vs $4,999 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
Quadro M6000
2015Why buy it
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 8 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (11,769 vs 22,172).
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 12 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌901.8% HIGHER MSRP$4,999 MSRPvs$499 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.4 vs 44.4 G3D/$ ($4,999 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 3070
2020Quadro M6000
2015Why buy it
- ✅+88.4% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $4,500 less on MSRP ($499 MSRP vs $4,999 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 1787.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.4 vs 2.4 G3D/$ ($499 MSRP vs $4,999 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 8 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (11,769 vs 22,172).
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 12 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌901.8% HIGHER MSRP$4,999 MSRPvs$499 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.4 vs 44.4 G3D/$ ($4,999 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 3070 better than Quadro M6000?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Quadro M6000 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3070 | Quadro M6000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 158 FPS | 154 FPS |
| medium | 140 FPS | 133 FPS |
| high | 123 FPS | 112 FPS |
| ultra | 104 FPS | 69 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 134 FPS | 124 FPS |
| medium | 109 FPS | 106 FPS |
| high | 96 FPS | 81 FPS |
| ultra | 86 FPS | 50 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 80 FPS | 42 FPS |
| medium | 67 FPS | 38 FPS |
| high | 52 FPS | 24 FPS |
| ultra | 45 FPS | 20 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3070 | Quadro M6000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 470 FPS | 202 FPS |
| medium | 405 FPS | 178 FPS |
| high | 327 FPS | 144 FPS |
| ultra | 277 FPS | 111 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 294 FPS | 135 FPS |
| medium | 246 FPS | 108 FPS |
| high | 213 FPS | 85 FPS |
| ultra | 179 FPS | 65 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 141 FPS | 61 FPS |
| medium | 120 FPS | 51 FPS |
| high | 105 FPS | 45 FPS |
| ultra | 83 FPS | 37 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3070 | Quadro M6000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 885 FPS | 530 FPS |
| medium | 712 FPS | 424 FPS |
| high | 619 FPS | 353 FPS |
| ultra | 499 FPS | 265 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 692 FPS | 397 FPS |
| medium | 557 FPS | 318 FPS |
| high | 473 FPS | 265 FPS |
| ultra | 374 FPS | 199 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 479 FPS | 265 FPS |
| medium | 388 FPS | 212 FPS |
| high | 330 FPS | 177 FPS |
| ultra | 249 FPS | 132 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3070 | Quadro M6000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 600 FPS | 286 FPS |
| medium | 527 FPS | 246 FPS |
| high | 433 FPS | 209 FPS |
| ultra | 385 FPS | 163 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 489 FPS | 212 FPS |
| medium | 433 FPS | 188 FPS |
| high | 339 FPS | 154 FPS |
| ultra | 297 FPS | 117 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 292 FPS | 120 FPS |
| medium | 270 FPS | 96 FPS |
| high | 238 FPS | 79 FPS |
| ultra | 200 FPS | 61 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3070 and Quadro M6000

GeForce RTX 3070
GeForce RTX 3070
The GeForce RTX 3070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 1 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1500 MHz to 1725 MHz. It has 5888 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 220W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,172 points. Launch price was $499.

Quadro M6000
Quadro M6000
The Quadro M6000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 21 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 988 MHz to 1114 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,769 points. Launch price was $4,199.99.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3070 scores 22,172 versus the Quadro M6000's 11,769 — the GeForce RTX 3070 leads by 88.4%. The GeForce RTX 3070 is built on Ampere while the Quadro M6000 uses Maxwell 2.0, both on 8 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 5,888 (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 3,072 (Quadro M6000). Raw compute: 20.31 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 6.844 TFLOPS (Quadro M6000). Boost clocks: 1725 MHz vs 1114 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Quadro M6000 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 22,172+88% | 11,769 |
| Architecture | Ampere | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 5888+92% | 3072 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 20.31 TFLOPS+197% | 6.844 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1725 MHz+55% | 1114 MHz |
| ROPs | 96 | 96 |
| TMUs | 184 | 192+4% |
| L1 Cache | 5.8 MB+427% | 1.1 MB |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+33% | 3 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3070 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Quadro M6000 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Quadro M6000 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3070 comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro M6000 has 12 GB. The Quadro M6000 offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 448 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 317 GB/s (Quadro M6000) — a 41.3% advantage for the GeForce RTX 3070. Bus width: 256-bit vs 384-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 3 MB (Quadro M6000) — the GeForce RTX 3070 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Quadro M6000 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 12 GB+50% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 448 GB/s+41% | 317 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | 384-bit+50% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+33% | 3 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 12/1 (Quadro M6000). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Quadro M6000 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12/1 |
| Vulkan | 1.4+27% | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6+2% | 4.5 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 7th gen (GeForce RTX 3070) vs NVENC 4.0 (Quadro M6000). Decoder: NVDEC 5th gen vs PureVideo HD VP6. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 (GeForce RTX 3070) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Quadro M6000).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Quadro M6000 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 7th gen | NVENC 4.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC 5th gen | PureVideo HD VP6 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3070 draws 220W versus the Quadro M6000's 250W — a 12.8% difference. The GeForce RTX 3070 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 500W (Quadro M6000). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 242mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Quadro M6000 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 220W-12% | 250W |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 500W-23% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 242mm | 267mm |
| Height | 112mm | 112mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C-6% | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 100.8+114% | 47.1 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3070 launched at $499 MSRP, while the Quadro M6000 launched at $4999. The GeForce RTX 3070 costs 90% less ($4500 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 44.4 (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 2.4 (Quadro M6000) — the GeForce RTX 3070 offers 1750% better value. The GeForce RTX 3070 is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2015).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Quadro M6000 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $499-90% | $4999 |
| Performance per Dollar | 44.4+1750% | 2.4 |
| Codename | GA104 | GM200 |
| Release | September 1 2020 | March 21 2015 |
| Ranking | #63 | #228 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












