
GeForce RTX 3070
Popular choices:

L2
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 3070
2020Why buy it
- ✅+305.6% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $1,501 less on MSRP ($499 MSRP vs $2,000 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 1525.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.4 vs 2.7 G3D/$ ($499 MSRP vs $2,000 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌44% longer card at 242mm vs 168mm.
L2
2023Why buy it
- ✅Measures 168mm instead of 242mm, a 74mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (5,467 vs 22,172).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌300.8% HIGHER MSRP$2,000 MSRPvs$499 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.7 vs 44.4 G3D/$ ($2,000 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 3070
2020L2
2023Why buy it
- ✅+305.6% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $1,501 less on MSRP ($499 MSRP vs $2,000 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 1525.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.4 vs 2.7 G3D/$ ($499 MSRP vs $2,000 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
Why buy it
- ✅Measures 168mm instead of 242mm, a 74mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌44% longer card at 242mm vs 168mm.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (5,467 vs 22,172).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌300.8% HIGHER MSRP$2,000 MSRPvs$499 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.7 vs 44.4 G3D/$ ($2,000 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 3070 better than L2?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does L2 make more sense than GeForce RTX 3070?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3070 | L2 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 158 FPS | 202 FPS |
| medium | 140 FPS | 190 FPS |
| high | 123 FPS | 160 FPS |
| ultra | 104 FPS | 119 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 134 FPS | 180 FPS |
| medium | 109 FPS | 148 FPS |
| high | 96 FPS | 123 FPS |
| ultra | 86 FPS | 92 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 80 FPS | 88 FPS |
| medium | 67 FPS | 76 FPS |
| high | 52 FPS | 58 FPS |
| ultra | 45 FPS | 51 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3070 | L2 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 470 FPS | 246 FPS |
| medium | 405 FPS | 197 FPS |
| high | 327 FPS | 164 FPS |
| ultra | 277 FPS | 123 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 294 FPS | 185 FPS |
| medium | 246 FPS | 148 FPS |
| high | 213 FPS | 123 FPS |
| ultra | 179 FPS | 92 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 141 FPS | 123 FPS |
| medium | 120 FPS | 98 FPS |
| high | 105 FPS | 82 FPS |
| ultra | 83 FPS | 62 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3070 | L2 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 885 FPS | 246 FPS |
| medium | 712 FPS | 197 FPS |
| high | 619 FPS | 164 FPS |
| ultra | 499 FPS | 123 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 692 FPS | 185 FPS |
| medium | 557 FPS | 148 FPS |
| high | 473 FPS | 123 FPS |
| ultra | 374 FPS | 92 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 479 FPS | 123 FPS |
| medium | 388 FPS | 98 FPS |
| high | 330 FPS | 82 FPS |
| ultra | 249 FPS | 62 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3070 | L2 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 600 FPS | 246 FPS |
| medium | 527 FPS | 197 FPS |
| high | 433 FPS | 164 FPS |
| ultra | 385 FPS | 123 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 489 FPS | 185 FPS |
| medium | 433 FPS | 148 FPS |
| high | 339 FPS | 123 FPS |
| ultra | 297 FPS | 92 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 292 FPS | 123 FPS |
| medium | 270 FPS | 98 FPS |
| high | 238 FPS | 82 FPS |
| ultra | 200 FPS | 62 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3070 and L2

GeForce RTX 3070
GeForce RTX 3070
The GeForce RTX 3070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 1 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1500 MHz to 1725 MHz. It has 5888 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 220W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,172 points. Launch price was $499.

L2
L2
The L2 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 16 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1440 MHz to 2520 MHz. It has 11776 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 275W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 92 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,467 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3070 scores 22,172 versus the L2's 5,467 — the GeForce RTX 3070 leads by 305.6%. The GeForce RTX 3070 is built on Ampere while the L2 uses Ada Lovelace, both on 8 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 5,888 (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 11,776 (L2). Raw compute: 20.31 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 59.35 TFLOPS (L2). Boost clocks: 1725 MHz vs 2520 MHz. Ray tracing: 46 RT cores (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 92 (L2) with 184 Tensor cores vs 368.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | L2 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 22,172+306% | 5,467 |
| Architecture | Ampere | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 5888 | 11776+100% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 20.31 TFLOPS | 59.35 TFLOPS+192% |
| Boost Clock | 1725 MHz | 2520 MHz+46% |
| ROPs | 96 | 128+33% |
| TMUs | 184 | 368+100% |
| L1 Cache | 5.8 MB | 11.5 MB+98% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 96 MB+2300% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 46 | 92+100% |
| Tensor Cores | 184 | 368+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3070 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The L2 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | L2 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3070 comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the L2 has 4 GB. The GeForce RTX 3070 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 96 MB (L2) — the L2 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | L2 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB+100% | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+100% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 96 MB+2300% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 12_2 (L2). Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | L2 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12_2 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 7th gen (GeForce RTX 3070) vs NVENC 8th Gen (L2). Decoder: NVDEC 5th gen vs NVDEC 5th Gen. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 (GeForce RTX 3070) vs H.264,H.265,AV1 (L2).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | L2 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 7th gen | NVENC 8th Gen |
| Decoder | NVDEC 5th gen | NVDEC 5th Gen |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 | H.264,H.265,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3070 draws 220W versus the L2's 275W — a 22.2% difference. The GeForce RTX 3070 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 350W (L2). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 242mm vs 168mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | L2 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 220W-20% | 275W |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 350W-46% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 242mm | 168mm |
| Height | 112mm | 69mm |
| Slots | 2 | 1-50% |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 100.8+407% | 19.9 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3070 launched at $499 MSRP, while the L2 launched at $2000. The GeForce RTX 3070 costs 75% less ($1501 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 44.4 (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 2.7 (L2) — the GeForce RTX 3070 offers 1544.4% better value. The L2 is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2020).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | L2 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $499-75% | $2000 |
| Performance per Dollar | 44.4+1544% | 2.7 |
| Codename | GA104 | AD102 |
| Release | September 1 2020 | November 16 2023 |
| Ranking | #63 | #189 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












