
GeForce RTX 3070
Popular choices:

Intel Arc Pro B50
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 3070
2020Why buy it
- ✅+81.6% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Delivers 27% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.4 vs 35.0 G3D/$ ($499 MSRP vs $349 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
Trade-offs
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: Intel Arc Pro B50 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌214.3% higher power demand at 220W vs 70W.
- ❌44.9% longer card at 242mm vs 167mm.
Intel Arc Pro B50
2025Why buy it
- ✅Costs $150 less on MSRP ($349 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
- ✅More future proof: Xe2 (2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 70W instead of 220W, a 150W reduction.
- ✅Measures 167mm instead of 242mm, a 75mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (12,208 vs 22,172).
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 35.0 vs 44.4 G3D/$ ($349 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 3070
2020Intel Arc Pro B50
2025Why buy it
- ✅+81.6% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Delivers 27% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.4 vs 35.0 G3D/$ ($499 MSRP vs $349 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $150 less on MSRP ($349 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
- ✅More future proof: Xe2 (2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 70W instead of 220W, a 150W reduction.
- ✅Measures 167mm instead of 242mm, a 75mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: Intel Arc Pro B50 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌214.3% higher power demand at 220W vs 70W.
- ❌44.9% longer card at 242mm vs 167mm.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (12,208 vs 22,172).
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 35.0 vs 44.4 G3D/$ ($349 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 3070 better than Intel Arc Pro B50?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does Intel Arc Pro B50 make more sense than GeForce RTX 3070?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3070 | Intel Arc Pro B50 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 158 FPS | 80 FPS |
| medium | 140 FPS | 58 FPS |
| high | 123 FPS | 46 FPS |
| ultra | 104 FPS | 29 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 134 FPS | 63 FPS |
| medium | 109 FPS | 37 FPS |
| high | 96 FPS | 24 FPS |
| ultra | 86 FPS | 16 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 80 FPS | 35 FPS |
| medium | 67 FPS | 21 FPS |
| high | 52 FPS | 15 FPS |
| ultra | 45 FPS | 11 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3070 | Intel Arc Pro B50 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 470 FPS | 185 FPS |
| medium | 405 FPS | 135 FPS |
| high | 327 FPS | 92 FPS |
| ultra | 277 FPS | 63 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 294 FPS | 107 FPS |
| medium | 246 FPS | 70 FPS |
| high | 213 FPS | 52 FPS |
| ultra | 179 FPS | 40 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 141 FPS | 44 FPS |
| medium | 120 FPS | 32 FPS |
| high | 105 FPS | 26 FPS |
| ultra | 83 FPS | 21 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3070 | Intel Arc Pro B50 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 885 FPS | 549 FPS |
| medium | 712 FPS | 439 FPS |
| high | 619 FPS | 366 FPS |
| ultra | 499 FPS | 275 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 692 FPS | 412 FPS |
| medium | 557 FPS | 330 FPS |
| high | 473 FPS | 275 FPS |
| ultra | 374 FPS | 206 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 479 FPS | 275 FPS |
| medium | 388 FPS | 220 FPS |
| high | 330 FPS | 183 FPS |
| ultra | 249 FPS | 137 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3070 | Intel Arc Pro B50 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 600 FPS | 549 FPS |
| medium | 527 FPS | 439 FPS |
| high | 433 FPS | 366 FPS |
| ultra | 385 FPS | 275 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 489 FPS | 412 FPS |
| medium | 433 FPS | 330 FPS |
| high | 339 FPS | 275 FPS |
| ultra | 297 FPS | 206 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 292 FPS | 275 FPS |
| medium | 270 FPS | 220 FPS |
| high | 238 FPS | 183 FPS |
| ultra | 200 FPS | 137 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3070 and Intel Arc Pro B50

GeForce RTX 3070
GeForce RTX 3070
The GeForce RTX 3070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 1 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1500 MHz to 1725 MHz. It has 5888 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 220W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,172 points. Launch price was $499.

Intel Arc Pro B50
Intel Arc Pro B50
The Intel Arc Pro B50 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in September 5 2025. It features the Xe2 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1700 MHz to 2600 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 16 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,208 points. Launch price was $349.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3070 scores 22,172 versus the Intel Arc Pro B50's 12,208 — the GeForce RTX 3070 leads by 81.6%. The GeForce RTX 3070 is built on Ampere while the Intel Arc Pro B50 uses Xe2, both on 8 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 5,888 (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 2,048 (Intel Arc Pro B50). Raw compute: 20.31 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 10.65 TFLOPS (Intel Arc Pro B50). Boost clocks: 1725 MHz vs 2600 MHz. Ray tracing: 46 RT cores (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 16 (Intel Arc Pro B50) with 184 Tensor cores.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Intel Arc Pro B50 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 22,172+82% | 12,208 |
| Architecture | Ampere | Xe2 |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 5888+188% | 2048 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 20.31 TFLOPS+91% | 10.65 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1725 MHz | 2600 MHz+51% |
| ROPs | 96+500% | 16 |
| TMUs | 184+44% | 128 |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 4 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 46+188% | 16 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3070 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Intel Arc Pro B50 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Intel Arc Pro B50 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 8 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 256-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Intel Arc Pro B50 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+100% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 4 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 12.2 (Intel Arc Pro B50). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Intel Arc Pro B50 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.4 | 1.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 7th gen (GeForce RTX 3070) vs Dual Arc Media Engine (Intel Arc Pro B50). Decoder: NVDEC 5th gen vs Dual Arc Media Engine. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 (GeForce RTX 3070) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Intel Arc Pro B50).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Intel Arc Pro B50 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 7th gen | Dual Arc Media Engine |
| Decoder | NVDEC 5th gen | Dual Arc Media Engine |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3070 draws 220W versus the Intel Arc Pro B50's 70W — a 103.4% difference. The Intel Arc Pro B50 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 500W (Intel Arc Pro B50). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 242mm vs 167mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Intel Arc Pro B50 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 220W | 70W-68% |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 500W-23% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 242mm | 167mm |
| Height | 112mm | 69mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 100.8 | 174.4+73% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3070 launched at $499 MSRP, while the Intel Arc Pro B50 launched at $349. The Intel Arc Pro B50 costs 30.1% less ($150 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 44.4 (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 35.0 (Intel Arc Pro B50) — the GeForce RTX 3070 offers 26.9% better value. The Intel Arc Pro B50 is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2020).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | Intel Arc Pro B50 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $499 | $349-30% |
| Performance per Dollar | 44.4+27% | 35.0 |
| Codename | GA104 | BMG-G21 |
| Release | September 1 2020 | September 5 2025 |
| Ranking | #63 | #221 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












