
GeForce RTX 3070
Popular choices:

GeForce RTX 4090 D
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 3070
2020Why buy it
- ✅Costs $1,100 less on MSRP ($499 MSRP vs $1,599 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 131.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.4 vs 19.2 G3D/$ ($499 MSRP vs $1,599 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 220W instead of 425W, a 205W reduction.
- ✅Measures 242mm instead of 304mm, a 62mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4090 D across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 24 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4090 D is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
GeForce RTX 4090 D
2023Why buy it
- ✅48.8% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (24 GB vs 8 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌220.4% HIGHER MSRP$1,599 MSRPvs$499 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 19.2 vs 44.4 G3D/$ ($1,599 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
- ❌93.2% higher power demand at 425W vs 220W.
- ❌25.6% longer card at 304mm vs 242mm.
GeForce RTX 3070
2020GeForce RTX 4090 D
2023Why buy it
- ✅Costs $1,100 less on MSRP ($499 MSRP vs $1,599 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 131.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.4 vs 19.2 G3D/$ ($499 MSRP vs $1,599 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 220W instead of 425W, a 205W reduction.
- ✅Measures 242mm instead of 304mm, a 62mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Why buy it
- ✅48.8% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (24 GB vs 8 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4090 D across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 24 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4090 D is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
Trade-offs
- ❌220.4% HIGHER MSRP$1,599 MSRPvs$499 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 19.2 vs 44.4 G3D/$ ($1,599 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
- ❌93.2% higher power demand at 425W vs 220W.
- ❌25.6% longer card at 304mm vs 242mm.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 4090 D better than GeForce RTX 3070?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is GeForce RTX 3070 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3070 | GeForce RTX 4090 D |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 158 FPS | 284 FPS |
| medium | 140 FPS | 263 FPS |
| high | 123 FPS | 225 FPS |
| ultra | 104 FPS | 197 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 134 FPS | 262 FPS |
| medium | 109 FPS | 217 FPS |
| high | 96 FPS | 173 FPS |
| ultra | 86 FPS | 156 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 80 FPS | 180 FPS |
| medium | 67 FPS | 150 FPS |
| high | 52 FPS | 114 FPS |
| ultra | 45 FPS | 102 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3070 | GeForce RTX 4090 D |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 470 FPS | 841 FPS |
| medium | 405 FPS | 657 FPS |
| high | 327 FPS | 516 FPS |
| ultra | 277 FPS | 449 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 294 FPS | 673 FPS |
| medium | 246 FPS | 548 FPS |
| high | 213 FPS | 443 FPS |
| ultra | 179 FPS | 364 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 141 FPS | 375 FPS |
| medium | 120 FPS | 314 FPS |
| high | 105 FPS | 286 FPS |
| ultra | 83 FPS | 240 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3070 | GeForce RTX 4090 D |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 885 FPS | 944 FPS |
| medium | 712 FPS | 772 FPS |
| high | 619 FPS | 699 FPS |
| ultra | 499 FPS | 604 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 692 FPS | 731 FPS |
| medium | 557 FPS | 598 FPS |
| high | 473 FPS | 529 FPS |
| ultra | 374 FPS | 452 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 479 FPS | 506 FPS |
| medium | 388 FPS | 419 FPS |
| high | 330 FPS | 377 FPS |
| ultra | 249 FPS | 317 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3070 | GeForce RTX 4090 D |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 600 FPS | 999 FPS |
| medium | 527 FPS | 971 FPS |
| high | 433 FPS | 855 FPS |
| ultra | 385 FPS | 691 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 489 FPS | 830 FPS |
| medium | 433 FPS | 728 FPS |
| high | 339 FPS | 641 FPS |
| ultra | 297 FPS | 518 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 292 FPS | 606 FPS |
| medium | 270 FPS | 538 FPS |
| high | 238 FPS | 461 FPS |
| ultra | 200 FPS | 346 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3070 and GeForce RTX 4090 D

GeForce RTX 3070
GeForce RTX 3070
The GeForce RTX 3070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 1 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1500 MHz to 1725 MHz. It has 5888 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 220W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,172 points. Launch price was $499.

GeForce RTX 4090 D
GeForce RTX 4090 D
The GeForce RTX 4090 D is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 28 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2280 MHz to 2520 MHz. It has 14592 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 425W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 114 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 30,725 points. Launch price was $1,599.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3070 scores 22,172 versus the GeForce RTX 4090 D's 30,725 — the GeForce RTX 4090 D leads by 38.6%. The GeForce RTX 3070 is built on Ampere while the GeForce RTX 4090 D uses Ada Lovelace, both on 8 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 5,888 (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 14,592 (GeForce RTX 4090 D). Raw compute: 20.31 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 73.54 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4090 D). Boost clocks: 1725 MHz vs 2520 MHz. Ray tracing: 46 RT cores (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 114 (GeForce RTX 4090 D) with 184 Tensor cores vs 456.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | GeForce RTX 4090 D |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 22,172 | 30,725+39% |
| Architecture | Ampere | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 5888 | 14592+148% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 20.31 TFLOPS | 73.54 TFLOPS+262% |
| Boost Clock | 1725 MHz | 2520 MHz+46% |
| ROPs | 96 | 176+83% |
| TMUs | 184 | 456+148% |
| L1 Cache | 5.8 MB | 14.3 MB+147% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 72 MB+1700% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 46 | 114+148% |
| Tensor Cores | 184 | 456+148% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4090 D is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The GeForce RTX 3070 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 4090 D supports the newer DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution, whereas the GeForce RTX 3070 is capped at DLSS 2 Super Resolution.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | GeForce RTX 4090 D |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | Yes (DLSS 3.5) |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3070 comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 4090 D has 24 GB. The GeForce RTX 4090 D offers 200% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 448 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 1008 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4090 D) — a 125% advantage for the GeForce RTX 4090 D. Bus width: 256-bit vs 384-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 72 MB (GeForce RTX 4090 D) — the GeForce RTX 4090 D has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | GeForce RTX 4090 D |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 24 GB+200% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6X |
| Memory Bandwidth | 448 GB/s | 1008 GB/s+125% |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | 384-bit+50% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 72 MB+1700% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4090 D). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | GeForce RTX 4090 D |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.4 | 1.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 7th gen (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 2x NVENC (8th Gen) (GeForce RTX 4090 D). Decoder: NVDEC 5th gen vs NVDEC (5th Gen). Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 (GeForce RTX 3070) vs H.264,HEVC,AV1,VP9 (GeForce RTX 4090 D).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | GeForce RTX 4090 D |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 7th gen | 2x NVENC (8th Gen) |
| Decoder | NVDEC 5th gen | NVDEC (5th Gen) |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 | H.264,HEVC,AV1,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3070 draws 220W versus the GeForce RTX 4090 D's 425W — a 63.6% difference. The GeForce RTX 3070 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 850W (GeForce RTX 4090 D). Power connectors: 8-pin vs 16-pin. Card length: 242mm vs 304mm, occupying 2 vs 3 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 78°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | GeForce RTX 4090 D |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 220W-48% | 425W |
| Recommended PSU | 650W-24% | 850W |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | 16-pin |
| Length | 242mm | 304mm |
| Height | 112mm | 137mm |
| Slots | 2-33% | 3 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C-4% | 78°C |
| Perf/Watt | 100.8+39% | 72.3 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3070 launched at $499 MSRP, while the GeForce RTX 4090 D launched at $1599. The GeForce RTX 3070 costs 68.8% less ($1100 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 44.4 (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 19.2 (GeForce RTX 4090 D) — the GeForce RTX 3070 offers 131.3% better value. The GeForce RTX 4090 D is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2020).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | GeForce RTX 4090 D |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $499-69% | $1599 |
| Performance per Dollar | 44.4+131% | 19.2 |
| Codename | GA104 | AD102 |
| Release | September 1 2020 | December 28 2023 |
| Ranking | #63 | #14 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












