
GeForce RTX 3070
Popular choices:

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 3070
2020Why buy it
- ✅35.3% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (184 vs 136).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌33.3% higher power demand at 220W vs 165W.
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB
2023Why buy it
- ✅9.8% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 8 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 165W instead of 220W, a 55W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (136 vs 184), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
GeForce RTX 3070
2020GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB
2023Why buy it
- ✅35.3% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (184 vs 136).
Why buy it
- ✅9.8% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 8 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 165W instead of 220W, a 55W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌33.3% higher power demand at 220W vs 165W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (136 vs 184), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB better than GeForce RTX 3070?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is GeForce RTX 3070 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3070 | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 158 FPS | 223 FPS |
| medium | 140 FPS | 208 FPS |
| high | 123 FPS | 182 FPS |
| ultra | 104 FPS | 168 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 134 FPS | 197 FPS |
| medium | 109 FPS | 166 FPS |
| high | 96 FPS | 137 FPS |
| ultra | 86 FPS | 131 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 80 FPS | 138 FPS |
| medium | 67 FPS | 115 FPS |
| high | 52 FPS | 94 FPS |
| ultra | 45 FPS | 87 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3070 | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 470 FPS | 433 FPS |
| medium | 405 FPS | 366 FPS |
| high | 327 FPS | 296 FPS |
| ultra | 277 FPS | 241 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 294 FPS | 279 FPS |
| medium | 246 FPS | 239 FPS |
| high | 213 FPS | 195 FPS |
| ultra | 179 FPS | 162 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 141 FPS | 123 FPS |
| medium | 120 FPS | 102 FPS |
| high | 105 FPS | 84 FPS |
| ultra | 83 FPS | 66 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3070 | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 885 FPS | 888 FPS |
| medium | 712 FPS | 716 FPS |
| high | 619 FPS | 628 FPS |
| ultra | 499 FPS | 511 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 692 FPS | 676 FPS |
| medium | 557 FPS | 537 FPS |
| high | 473 FPS | 460 FPS |
| ultra | 374 FPS | 383 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 479 FPS | 458 FPS |
| medium | 388 FPS | 363 FPS |
| high | 330 FPS | 312 FPS |
| ultra | 249 FPS | 256 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3070 | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 600 FPS | 775 FPS |
| medium | 527 FPS | 639 FPS |
| high | 433 FPS | 558 FPS |
| ultra | 385 FPS | 492 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 489 FPS | 613 FPS |
| medium | 433 FPS | 503 FPS |
| high | 339 FPS | 435 FPS |
| ultra | 297 FPS | 378 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 292 FPS | 375 FPS |
| medium | 270 FPS | 322 FPS |
| high | 238 FPS | 298 FPS |
| ultra | 200 FPS | 256 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3070 and GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB

GeForce RTX 3070
GeForce RTX 3070
The GeForce RTX 3070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 1 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1500 MHz to 1725 MHz. It has 5888 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 220W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,172 points. Launch price was $499.

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2535 MHz. It has 4352 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 165W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 34 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,713 points. Launch price was $499.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce RTX 3070 scores 22,172 and the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB reaches 22,713 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce RTX 3070 is built on Ampere while the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB uses Ada Lovelace, both on 8 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 5,888 (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 4,352 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB). Raw compute: 20.31 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 22.06 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB). Boost clocks: 1725 MHz vs 2535 MHz. Ray tracing: 46 RT cores (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 34 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB) with 184 Tensor cores vs 136.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 22,172 | 22,713+2% |
| Architecture | Ampere | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 5888+35% | 4352 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 20.31 TFLOPS | 22.06 TFLOPS+9% |
| Boost Clock | 1725 MHz | 2535 MHz+47% |
| ROPs | 96+100% | 48 |
| TMUs | 184+35% | 136 |
| L1 Cache | 5.8 MB+35% | 4.3 MB |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 32 MB+700% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 46+35% | 34 |
| Tensor Cores | 184+35% | 136 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The GeForce RTX 3070 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB supports the newer DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution, whereas the GeForce RTX 3070 is capped at DLSS 2 Super Resolution.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | Yes (DLSS 3.5) |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3070 comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB has 16 GB. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 448 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 288 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB) — a 55.6% advantage for the GeForce RTX 3070. Bus width: 256-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 32 MB (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB) — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 16 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 448 GB/s+56% | 288 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+100% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 32 MB+700% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.4+8% | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 7th gen (GeForce RTX 3070) vs NVENC 8th gen (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB). Decoder: NVDEC 5th gen vs NVDEC 5th gen. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 (GeForce RTX 3070) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 7th gen | NVENC 8th gen |
| Decoder | NVDEC 5th gen | NVDEC 5th gen |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3070 draws 220W versus the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB's 165W — a 28.6% difference. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 550W (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB). Power connectors: 8-pin vs 16-pin (12VHPWR). Card length: 242mm vs 240mm, occupying 2 vs 2.2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 65°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 220W | 165W-25% |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 550W-15% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | 16-pin (12VHPWR) |
| Length | 242mm | 240mm |
| Height | 112mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2-9% | 2.2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | 65°C-13% |
| Perf/Watt | 100.8 | 137.7+37% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3070 launched at $499 MSRP, while the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB launched at $499. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 44.4 (GeForce RTX 3070) vs 45.5 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB) — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB offers 2.5% better value. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2020).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3070 | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $499 | $499 |
| Performance per Dollar | 44.4 | 45.5+2% |
| Codename | GA104 | AD106 |
| Release | September 1 2020 | May 18 2023 |
| Ranking | #63 | #56 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












