
GeForce GTX TITAN X
Popular choices:

GeForce RTX 3070
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX TITAN X
2015Why buy it
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 8 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (12,621 vs 22,172).
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 12 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌100.2% HIGHER MSRP$999 MSRPvs$499 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 12.6 vs 44.4 G3D/$ ($999 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 3070
2020Why buy it
- ✅+75.7% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $500 less on MSRP ($499 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 251.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.4 vs 12.6 G3D/$ ($499 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
GeForce GTX TITAN X
2015GeForce RTX 3070
2020Why buy it
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 8 GB).
Why buy it
- ✅+75.7% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $500 less on MSRP ($499 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 251.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.4 vs 12.6 G3D/$ ($499 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (12,621 vs 22,172).
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 12 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌100.2% HIGHER MSRP$999 MSRPvs$499 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 12.6 vs 44.4 G3D/$ ($999 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 3070 better than GeForce GTX TITAN X?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is GeForce GTX TITAN X still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX TITAN X | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 154 FPS | 158 FPS |
| medium | 133 FPS | 140 FPS |
| high | 112 FPS | 123 FPS |
| ultra | 69 FPS | 104 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 124 FPS | 134 FPS |
| medium | 106 FPS | 109 FPS |
| high | 81 FPS | 96 FPS |
| ultra | 50 FPS | 86 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 42 FPS | 80 FPS |
| medium | 38 FPS | 67 FPS |
| high | 24 FPS | 52 FPS |
| ultra | 20 FPS | 45 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX TITAN X | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 187 FPS | 470 FPS |
| medium | 166 FPS | 405 FPS |
| high | 135 FPS | 327 FPS |
| ultra | 104 FPS | 277 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 128 FPS | 294 FPS |
| medium | 104 FPS | 246 FPS |
| high | 82 FPS | 213 FPS |
| ultra | 62 FPS | 179 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 60 FPS | 141 FPS |
| medium | 50 FPS | 120 FPS |
| high | 46 FPS | 105 FPS |
| ultra | 37 FPS | 83 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX TITAN X | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 568 FPS | 885 FPS |
| medium | 454 FPS | 712 FPS |
| high | 379 FPS | 619 FPS |
| ultra | 284 FPS | 499 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 426 FPS | 692 FPS |
| medium | 341 FPS | 557 FPS |
| high | 284 FPS | 473 FPS |
| ultra | 213 FPS | 374 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 284 FPS | 479 FPS |
| medium | 227 FPS | 388 FPS |
| high | 189 FPS | 330 FPS |
| ultra | 142 FPS | 249 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX TITAN X | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 235 FPS | 600 FPS |
| medium | 204 FPS | 527 FPS |
| high | 167 FPS | 433 FPS |
| ultra | 140 FPS | 385 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 179 FPS | 489 FPS |
| medium | 157 FPS | 433 FPS |
| high | 125 FPS | 339 FPS |
| ultra | 102 FPS | 297 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 102 FPS | 292 FPS |
| medium | 83 FPS | 270 FPS |
| high | 67 FPS | 238 FPS |
| ultra | 53 FPS | 200 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX TITAN X and GeForce RTX 3070

GeForce GTX TITAN X
GeForce GTX TITAN X
The GeForce GTX TITAN X is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 17 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1075 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,621 points. Launch price was $999.

GeForce RTX 3070
GeForce RTX 3070
The GeForce RTX 3070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 1 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1500 MHz to 1725 MHz. It has 5888 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 220W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,172 points. Launch price was $499.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX TITAN X scores 12,621 versus the GeForce RTX 3070's 22,172 — the GeForce RTX 3070 leads by 75.7%. The GeForce GTX TITAN X is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the GeForce RTX 3070 uses Ampere, both on 28 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 3,072 (GeForce GTX TITAN X) vs 5,888 (GeForce RTX 3070). Raw compute: 6.691 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX TITAN X) vs 20.31 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3070). Boost clocks: 1075 MHz vs 1725 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX TITAN X | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 12,621 | 22,172+76% |
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | Ampere |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 3072 | 5888+92% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 6.691 TFLOPS | 20.31 TFLOPS+204% |
| Boost Clock | 1075 MHz | 1725 MHz+60% |
| ROPs | 96 | 96 |
| TMUs | 192+4% | 184 |
| L1 Cache | 1.1 MB | 5.8 MB+427% |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB | 4 MB+33% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3070 supports the newer DLSS 2 Super Resolution, whereas the GeForce GTX TITAN X is capped at Upscaling support.
| Feature | GeForce GTX TITAN X | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | DLSS 2 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX TITAN X comes with 12 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 3070 has 8 GB. The GeForce GTX TITAN X offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 336 GB/s (GeForce GTX TITAN X) vs 448 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3070) — a 33.3% advantage for the GeForce RTX 3070. Bus width: 384-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 3 MB (GeForce GTX TITAN X) vs 4 MB (GeForce RTX 3070) — the GeForce RTX 3070 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX TITAN X | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 12 GB+50% | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 336 GB/s | 448 GB/s+33% |
| Bus Width | 384-bit+50% | 256-bit |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB | 4 MB+33% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (FL 12_1) (GeForce GTX TITAN X) vs 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3070). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX TITAN X | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (FL 12_1) | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.4+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6+2% |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 2nd gen (GeForce GTX TITAN X) vs NVENC 7th gen (GeForce RTX 3070). Decoder: NVDEC 2nd gen vs NVDEC 5th gen. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC (GeForce GTX TITAN X) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 (GeForce RTX 3070).
| Feature | GeForce GTX TITAN X | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 2nd gen | NVENC 7th gen |
| Decoder | NVDEC 2nd gen | NVDEC 5th gen |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX TITAN X draws 250W versus the GeForce RTX 3070's 220W — a 12.8% difference. The GeForce RTX 3070 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 600W (GeForce GTX TITAN X) vs 650W (GeForce RTX 3070). Power connectors: 6-pin + 8-pin vs 8-pin. Card length: 267mm vs 242mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 83°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | GeForce GTX TITAN X | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 250W | 220W-12% |
| Recommended PSU | 600W-8% | 650W |
| Power Connector | 6-pin + 8-pin | 8-pin |
| Length | 267mm | 242mm |
| Height | 111mm | 112mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 83°C | 75°C-10% |
| Perf/Watt | 50.5 | 100.8+100% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX TITAN X launched at $999 MSRP, while the GeForce RTX 3070 launched at $499. The GeForce RTX 3070 costs 50.1% less ($500 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 12.6 (GeForce GTX TITAN X) vs 44.4 (GeForce RTX 3070) — the GeForce RTX 3070 offers 252.4% better value. The GeForce RTX 3070 is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2015).
| Feature | GeForce GTX TITAN X | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $999 | $499-50% |
| Performance per Dollar | 12.6 | 44.4+252% |
| Codename | GM200 | GA104 |
| Release | March 17 2015 | September 1 2020 |
| Ranking | #209 | #63 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













