
GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
Popular choices:

GeForce RTX 3060
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
2017Why buy it
- ✅+9.5% higher PassMark G3D performance.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3060 across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 11 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌112.5% HIGHER MSRP$699 MSRPvs$329 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 26.6 vs 51.7 G3D/$ ($699 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 3060
2021Why buy it
- ✅3.3% more average FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $370 less on MSRP ($329 MSRP vs $699 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 94.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 51.7 vs 26.6 G3D/$ ($329 MSRP vs $699 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (16,995 vs 18,606).
GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
2017GeForce RTX 3060
2021Why buy it
- ✅+9.5% higher PassMark G3D performance.
Why buy it
- ✅3.3% more average FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $370 less on MSRP ($329 MSRP vs $699 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 94.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 51.7 vs 26.6 G3D/$ ($329 MSRP vs $699 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3060 across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 11 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌112.5% HIGHER MSRP$699 MSRPvs$329 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 26.6 vs 51.7 G3D/$ ($699 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (16,995 vs 18,606).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 3060 better than GeForce GTX 1080 Ti?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is GeForce GTX 1080 Ti still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1080 Ti | GeForce RTX 3060 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 153 FPS | 149 FPS |
| medium | 136 FPS | 131 FPS |
| high | 123 FPS | 118 FPS |
| ultra | 105 FPS | 99 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 131 FPS | 126 FPS |
| medium | 107 FPS | 104 FPS |
| high | 95 FPS | 92 FPS |
| ultra | 86 FPS | 80 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 74 FPS | 67 FPS |
| medium | 63 FPS | 58 FPS |
| high | 48 FPS | 39 FPS |
| ultra | 42 FPS | 32 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1080 Ti | GeForce RTX 3060 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 348 FPS | 354 FPS |
| medium | 302 FPS | 310 FPS |
| high | 225 FPS | 249 FPS |
| ultra | 181 FPS | 195 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 219 FPS | 222 FPS |
| medium | 189 FPS | 196 FPS |
| high | 154 FPS | 160 FPS |
| ultra | 123 FPS | 128 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 106 FPS | 110 FPS |
| medium | 89 FPS | 94 FPS |
| high | 74 FPS | 77 FPS |
| ultra | 58 FPS | 60 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1080 Ti | GeForce RTX 3060 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 798 FPS | 765 FPS |
| medium | 649 FPS | 612 FPS |
| high | 558 FPS | 510 FPS |
| ultra | 419 FPS | 382 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 628 FPS | 535 FPS |
| medium | 502 FPS | 432 FPS |
| high | 419 FPS | 366 FPS |
| ultra | 314 FPS | 287 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 419 FPS | 367 FPS |
| medium | 335 FPS | 298 FPS |
| high | 279 FPS | 221 FPS |
| ultra | 209 FPS | 176 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1080 Ti | GeForce RTX 3060 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 519 FPS | 523 FPS |
| medium | 449 FPS | 452 FPS |
| high | 386 FPS | 383 FPS |
| ultra | 319 FPS | 319 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 422 FPS | 428 FPS |
| medium | 367 FPS | 371 FPS |
| high | 299 FPS | 298 FPS |
| ultra | 246 FPS | 245 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 259 FPS | 279 FPS |
| medium | 246 FPS | 259 FPS |
| high | 214 FPS | 225 FPS |
| ultra | 180 FPS | 186 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1080 Ti and GeForce RTX 3060

GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
The GeForce GTX 1080 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 10 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1481 MHz to 1582 MHz. It has 3584 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 18,606 points. Launch price was $699.

GeForce RTX 3060
GeForce RTX 3060
The GeForce RTX 3060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 12 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1320 MHz to 1777 MHz. It has 3584 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 170W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 16,995 points. Launch price was $329.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1080 Ti scores 18,606 versus the GeForce RTX 3060's 16,995 — the GeForce GTX 1080 Ti leads by 9.5%. The GeForce GTX 1080 Ti is built on Pascal while the GeForce RTX 3060 uses Ampere, both on 16 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 3,584 (GeForce GTX 1080 Ti) vs 3,584 (GeForce RTX 3060). Raw compute: 11.34 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1080 Ti) vs 12.74 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3060). Boost clocks: 1582 MHz vs 1777 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1080 Ti | GeForce RTX 3060 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 18,606+9% | 16,995 |
| Architecture | Pascal | Ampere |
| Process Node | 16 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 3584 | 3584 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 11.34 TFLOPS | 12.74 TFLOPS+12% |
| Boost Clock | 1582 MHz | 1777 MHz+12% |
| ROPs | 88+83% | 48 |
| TMUs | 224+100% | 112 |
| L1 Cache | 1.3 MB | 3.5 MB+169% |
| L2 Cache | 2.75 MB | 3 MB+9% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3060 supports the newer DLSS 2 Super Resolution, whereas the GeForce GTX 1080 Ti is capped at Upscaling support.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1080 Ti | GeForce RTX 3060 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | DLSS 2 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 1080 Ti comes with 11 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 3060 has 12 GB. The GeForce RTX 3060 offers 9.1% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 484 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1080 Ti) vs 360 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3060) — a 34.4% advantage for the GeForce GTX 1080 Ti. Bus width: 352-bit vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 2.75 MB (GeForce GTX 1080 Ti) vs 3 MB (GeForce RTX 3060) — the GeForce RTX 3060 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1080 Ti | GeForce RTX 3060 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 11 GB | 12 GB+9% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5X | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 484 GB/s+34% | 360 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 352-bit+83% | 192-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2.75 MB | 3 MB+9% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1080 Ti) vs 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3060). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1080 Ti | GeForce RTX 3060 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 4th gen (GeForce GTX 1080 Ti) vs NVENC 7th Gen (GeForce RTX 3060). Decoder: NVDEC 3rd gen vs NVDEC 5th Gen. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce GTX 1080 Ti) vs AV1,H.265,H.264,VP9 (GeForce RTX 3060).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1080 Ti | GeForce RTX 3060 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 4th gen | NVENC 7th Gen |
| Decoder | NVDEC 3rd gen | NVDEC 5th Gen |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9,MPEG-2,VC-1 | AV1,H.265,H.264,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1080 Ti draws 250W versus the GeForce RTX 3060's 170W — a 38.1% difference. The GeForce RTX 3060 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 600W (GeForce GTX 1080 Ti) vs 550W (GeForce RTX 3060). Power connectors: 6-pin + 8-pin vs 8-pin. Card length: 267mm vs 242mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 75.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1080 Ti | GeForce RTX 3060 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 250W | 170W-32% |
| Recommended PSU | 600W | 550W-8% |
| Power Connector | 6-pin + 8-pin | 8-pin |
| Length | 267mm | 242mm |
| Height | 112mm | 112mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | 75 |
| Perf/Watt | 74.4 | 100.0+34% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 1080 Ti launched at $699 MSRP, while the GeForce RTX 3060 launched at $329. The GeForce RTX 3060 costs 52.9% less ($370 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 26.6 (GeForce GTX 1080 Ti) vs 51.7 (GeForce RTX 3060) — the GeForce RTX 3060 offers 94.4% better value. The GeForce RTX 3060 is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2017).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1080 Ti | GeForce RTX 3060 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $699 | $329-53% |
| Performance per Dollar | 26.6 | 51.7+94% |
| Codename | GP102 | GA106 |
| Release | March 10 2017 | January 12 2021 |
| Ranking | #95 | #114 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












