
GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
Popular choices:

RTX A4000
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
2017Why buy it
- ✅Costs $412 less on MSRP ($699 MSRP vs $1,111 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 51.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 26.6 vs 17.5 G3D/$ ($699 MSRP vs $1,111 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than RTX A4000 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 11 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 11 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌78.6% higher power demand at 250W vs 140W.
- ❌10.8% longer card at 267mm vs 241mm.
RTX A4000
2021Why buy it
- ✅23.4% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅45.5% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 11 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 140W instead of 250W, a 110W reduction.
- ✅Measures 241mm instead of 267mm, a 26mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌58.9% HIGHER MSRP$1,111 MSRPvs$699 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 17.5 vs 26.6 G3D/$ ($1,111 MSRP vs $699 MSRP).
GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
2017RTX A4000
2021Why buy it
- ✅Costs $412 less on MSRP ($699 MSRP vs $1,111 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 51.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 26.6 vs 17.5 G3D/$ ($699 MSRP vs $1,111 MSRP).
Why buy it
- ✅23.4% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅45.5% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 11 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 140W instead of 250W, a 110W reduction.
- ✅Measures 241mm instead of 267mm, a 26mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than RTX A4000 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 11 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 11 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌78.6% higher power demand at 250W vs 140W.
- ❌10.8% longer card at 267mm vs 241mm.
Trade-offs
- ❌58.9% HIGHER MSRP$1,111 MSRPvs$699 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 17.5 vs 26.6 G3D/$ ($1,111 MSRP vs $699 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is RTX A4000 better than GeForce GTX 1080 Ti?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is GeForce GTX 1080 Ti still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1080 Ti | RTX A4000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 153 FPS | 166 FPS |
| medium | 136 FPS | 148 FPS |
| high | 123 FPS | 125 FPS |
| ultra | 105 FPS | 90 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 131 FPS | 146 FPS |
| medium | 107 FPS | 124 FPS |
| high | 95 FPS | 91 FPS |
| ultra | 86 FPS | 66 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 74 FPS | 70 FPS |
| medium | 63 FPS | 60 FPS |
| high | 48 FPS | 43 FPS |
| ultra | 42 FPS | 38 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1080 Ti | RTX A4000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 348 FPS | 261 FPS |
| medium | 302 FPS | 219 FPS |
| high | 225 FPS | 182 FPS |
| ultra | 181 FPS | 158 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 219 FPS | 187 FPS |
| medium | 189 FPS | 150 FPS |
| high | 154 FPS | 129 FPS |
| ultra | 123 FPS | 107 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 106 FPS | 95 FPS |
| medium | 89 FPS | 78 FPS |
| high | 74 FPS | 68 FPS |
| ultra | 58 FPS | 53 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1080 Ti | RTX A4000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 798 FPS | 873 FPS |
| medium | 649 FPS | 701 FPS |
| high | 558 FPS | 584 FPS |
| ultra | 419 FPS | 438 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 628 FPS | 657 FPS |
| medium | 502 FPS | 526 FPS |
| high | 419 FPS | 438 FPS |
| ultra | 314 FPS | 328 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 419 FPS | 438 FPS |
| medium | 335 FPS | 350 FPS |
| high | 279 FPS | 292 FPS |
| ultra | 209 FPS | 219 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1080 Ti | RTX A4000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 519 FPS | 282 FPS |
| medium | 449 FPS | 246 FPS |
| high | 386 FPS | 201 FPS |
| ultra | 319 FPS | 173 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 422 FPS | 217 FPS |
| medium | 367 FPS | 193 FPS |
| high | 299 FPS | 159 FPS |
| ultra | 246 FPS | 134 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 259 FPS | 132 FPS |
| medium | 246 FPS | 113 FPS |
| high | 214 FPS | 90 FPS |
| ultra | 180 FPS | 73 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1080 Ti and RTX A4000

GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
The GeForce GTX 1080 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 10 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1481 MHz to 1582 MHz. It has 3584 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 18,606 points. Launch price was $699.

RTX A4000
RTX A4000
The RTX A4000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 735 MHz to 1560 MHz. It has 6144 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 140W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 48 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 19,463 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 1080 Ti scores 18,606 and the RTX A4000 reaches 19,463 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 1080 Ti is built on Pascal while the RTX A4000 uses Ampere, both on 16 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 3,584 (GeForce GTX 1080 Ti) vs 6,144 (RTX A4000). Raw compute: 11.34 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1080 Ti) vs 19.17 TFLOPS (RTX A4000). Boost clocks: 1582 MHz vs 1560 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1080 Ti | RTX A4000 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 18,606 | 19,463+5% |
| Architecture | Pascal | Ampere |
| Process Node | 16 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 3584 | 6144+71% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 11.34 TFLOPS | 19.17 TFLOPS+69% |
| Boost Clock | 1582 MHz+1% | 1560 MHz |
| ROPs | 88 | 96+9% |
| TMUs | 224+17% | 192 |
| L1 Cache | 1.3 MB | 6 MB+362% |
| L2 Cache | 2.75 MB | 4 MB+45% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1080 Ti | RTX A4000 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 1080 Ti comes with 11 GB of VRAM, while the RTX A4000 has 16 GB. The RTX A4000 offers 45.5% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 484 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1080 Ti) vs 448 GB/s (RTX A4000) — a 8% advantage for the GeForce GTX 1080 Ti. Bus width: 352-bit vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 2.75 MB (GeForce GTX 1080 Ti) vs 4 MB (RTX A4000) — the RTX A4000 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1080 Ti | RTX A4000 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 11 GB | 16 GB+45% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5X | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 484 GB/s+8% | 448 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 352-bit+83% | 192-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2.75 MB | 4 MB+45% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1080 Ti) vs 12.2 (RTX A4000). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1080 Ti | RTX A4000 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.3+8% | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 4th gen (GeForce GTX 1080 Ti) vs 7th Gen NVENC (RTX A4000). Decoder: NVDEC 3rd gen vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce GTX 1080 Ti) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (RTX A4000).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1080 Ti | RTX A4000 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 4th gen | 7th Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | NVDEC 3rd gen | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9,MPEG-2,VC-1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1080 Ti draws 250W versus the RTX A4000's 140W — a 56.4% difference. The RTX A4000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 600W (GeForce GTX 1080 Ti) vs 650W (RTX A4000). Power connectors: 6-pin + 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 267mm vs 241mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1080 Ti | RTX A4000 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 250W | 140W-44% |
| Recommended PSU | 600W-8% | 650W |
| Power Connector | 6-pin + 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 267mm | 241mm |
| Height | 112mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 1-50% |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 74.4 | 139.0+87% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 1080 Ti launched at $699 MSRP, while the RTX A4000 launched at $1111. The GeForce GTX 1080 Ti costs 37.1% less ($412 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 26.6 (GeForce GTX 1080 Ti) vs 17.5 (RTX A4000) — the GeForce GTX 1080 Ti offers 52% better value. The RTX A4000 is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2017).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1080 Ti | RTX A4000 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $699-37% | $1111 |
| Performance per Dollar | 26.6+52% | 17.5 |
| Codename | GP102 | GA104 |
| Release | March 10 2017 | April 12 2021 |
| Ranking | #95 | #85 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












