
GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design
Popular choices:

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design
2020Why buy it
- ✅110.5% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (320 vs 152).
- ✅Draws 80W instead of 200W, a 120W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3060 Ti across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 50.9 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
2020Why buy it
- ✅40.5% more average FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 50.9 vs 0 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (152 vs 320), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
- ❌150% higher power demand at 200W vs 80W.
GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design
2020GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
2020Why buy it
- ✅110.5% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (320 vs 152).
- ✅Draws 80W instead of 200W, a 120W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅40.5% more average FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 50.9 vs 0 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3060 Ti across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 50.9 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (152 vs 320), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
- ❌150% higher power demand at 200W vs 80W.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 3060 Ti better than GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 111 FPS | 152 FPS |
| medium | 93 FPS | 137 FPS |
| high | 78 FPS | 118 FPS |
| ultra | 52 FPS | 100 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 94 FPS | 131 FPS |
| medium | 79 FPS | 107 FPS |
| high | 59 FPS | 91 FPS |
| ultra | 38 FPS | 82 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 39 FPS | 77 FPS |
| medium | 35 FPS | 65 FPS |
| high | 22 FPS | 50 FPS |
| ultra | 18 FPS | 43 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 252 FPS | 425 FPS |
| medium | 213 FPS | 366 FPS |
| high | 179 FPS | 296 FPS |
| ultra | 154 FPS | 248 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 197 FPS | 272 FPS |
| medium | 163 FPS | 229 FPS |
| high | 137 FPS | 190 FPS |
| ultra | 112 FPS | 156 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 115 FPS | 133 FPS |
| medium | 98 FPS | 114 FPS |
| high | 79 FPS | 96 FPS |
| ultra | 58 FPS | 73 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 605 FPS | 859 FPS |
| medium | 484 FPS | 693 FPS |
| high | 403 FPS | 602 FPS |
| ultra | 302 FPS | 457 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 454 FPS | 658 FPS |
| medium | 363 FPS | 529 FPS |
| high | 302 FPS | 452 FPS |
| ultra | 227 FPS | 343 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 302 FPS | 434 FPS |
| medium | 242 FPS | 346 FPS |
| high | 202 FPS | 275 FPS |
| ultra | 151 FPS | 221 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 247 FPS | 580 FPS |
| medium | 214 FPS | 514 FPS |
| high | 172 FPS | 424 FPS |
| ultra | 146 FPS | 373 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 189 FPS | 478 FPS |
| medium | 167 FPS | 427 FPS |
| high | 131 FPS | 335 FPS |
| ultra | 108 FPS | 290 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 112 FPS | 285 FPS |
| medium | 94 FPS | 266 FPS |
| high | 76 FPS | 234 FPS |
| ultra | 58 FPS | 195 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design and GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design
GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design
The GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 2 2020. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 930 MHz to 1155 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 80W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 40 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,444 points.

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 1 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1410 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 4864 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 38 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 20,312 points. Launch price was $399.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design scores 13,444 versus the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti's 20,312 — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti leads by 51.1%. The GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design is built on Turing while the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti uses Ampere, both on 12 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design) vs 4,864 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti). Raw compute: 5.914 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design) vs 16.2 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti). Boost clocks: 1155 MHz vs 1665 MHz. Ray tracing: 40 RT cores (GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design) vs 38 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) with 320 Tensor cores vs 152.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 13,444 | 20,312+51% |
| Architecture | Turing | Ampere |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560 | 4864+90% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 5.914 TFLOPS | 16.2 TFLOPS+174% |
| Boost Clock | 1155 MHz | 1665 MHz+44% |
| ROPs | 64 | 80+25% |
| TMUs | 160+5% | 152 |
| L1 Cache | 2.5 MB | 4.8 MB+92% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 4 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 40+5% | 38 |
| Tensor Cores | 320+111% | 152 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | DLSS 2 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 8 GB of GDDR6. Memory bandwidth: 352 GB/s (GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design) vs 448 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) — a 27.3% advantage for the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti. Bus width: 256-bit vs 256-bit.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 352 GB/s | 448 GB/s+27% |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | 256-bit |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 4 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design) vs 12 Ultimate (12_2) (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 7th Gen (GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design) vs NVENC (Ampere) (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti). Decoder: NVDEC 4th Gen vs NVDEC (Ampere). Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design) vs H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 7th Gen | NVENC (Ampere) |
| Decoder | NVDEC 4th Gen | NVDEC (Ampere) |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 | H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design draws 80W versus the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti's 200W — a 85.7% difference. The GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design) vs 600W (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 8-pin. Card length: 0mm vs 242mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75 vs 75.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 80W-60% | 200W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W-17% | 600W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 8-pin |
| Length | 0mm | 242mm |
| Height | 0mm | 112mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75 | 75 |
| Perf/Watt | 168.1+65% | 101.6 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













