
GeForce RTX 2050
Popular choices:

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 2050
2018Why buy it
- ✅Costs $249 less on MSRP ($150 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
- ✅142.1% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (368 vs 152).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3060 Ti across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
2020Why buy it
- ✅67.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (152 vs 368), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
- ❌166% HIGHER MSRP$399 MSRPvs$150 MSRP
GeForce RTX 2050
2018GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
2020Why buy it
- ✅Costs $249 less on MSRP ($150 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
- ✅142.1% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (368 vs 152).
Why buy it
- ✅67.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3060 Ti across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (152 vs 368), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
- ❌166% HIGHER MSRP$399 MSRPvs$150 MSRP
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 3060 Ti better than GeForce RTX 2050?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is GeForce RTX 2050 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2050 | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 120 FPS | 152 FPS |
| medium | 109 FPS | 137 FPS |
| high | 93 FPS | 118 FPS |
| ultra | 79 FPS | 100 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 105 FPS | 131 FPS |
| medium | 89 FPS | 107 FPS |
| high | 77 FPS | 91 FPS |
| ultra | 67 FPS | 82 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 56 FPS | 77 FPS |
| medium | 50 FPS | 65 FPS |
| high | 42 FPS | 50 FPS |
| ultra | 37 FPS | 43 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2050 | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 347 FPS | 425 FPS |
| medium | 278 FPS | 366 FPS |
| high | 231 FPS | 296 FPS |
| ultra | 174 FPS | 248 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 244 FPS | 272 FPS |
| medium | 201 FPS | 229 FPS |
| high | 174 FPS | 190 FPS |
| ultra | 130 FPS | 156 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 118 FPS | 133 FPS |
| medium | 98 FPS | 114 FPS |
| high | 85 FPS | 96 FPS |
| ultra | 66 FPS | 73 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2050 | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 347 FPS | 859 FPS |
| medium | 278 FPS | 693 FPS |
| high | 231 FPS | 602 FPS |
| ultra | 174 FPS | 457 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 260 FPS | 658 FPS |
| medium | 208 FPS | 529 FPS |
| high | 174 FPS | 452 FPS |
| ultra | 130 FPS | 343 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 174 FPS | 434 FPS |
| medium | 139 FPS | 346 FPS |
| high | 116 FPS | 275 FPS |
| ultra | 87 FPS | 221 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2050 | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 331 FPS | 580 FPS |
| medium | 277 FPS | 514 FPS |
| high | 231 FPS | 424 FPS |
| ultra | 174 FPS | 373 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 255 FPS | 478 FPS |
| medium | 208 FPS | 427 FPS |
| high | 174 FPS | 335 FPS |
| ultra | 130 FPS | 290 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 144 FPS | 285 FPS |
| medium | 130 FPS | 266 FPS |
| high | 114 FPS | 234 FPS |
| ultra | 87 FPS | 195 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 2050 and GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

GeForce RTX 2050
GeForce RTX 2050
The GeForce RTX 2050 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 20 2018. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1515 MHz to 1710 MHz. It has 2944 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 215W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,714 points. Launch price was $699.

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 1 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1410 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 4864 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 38 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 20,312 points. Launch price was $399.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 2050 scores 7,714 versus the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti's 20,312 — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti leads by 163.3%. The GeForce RTX 2050 is built on Turing while the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti uses Ampere, both on 12 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 2,944 (GeForce RTX 2050) vs 4,864 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti). Raw compute: 10.07 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 2050) vs 16.2 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti). Boost clocks: 1710 MHz vs 1665 MHz. Ray tracing: 46 RT cores (GeForce RTX 2050) vs 38 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) with 368 Tensor cores vs 152.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2050 | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 7,714 | 20,312+163% |
| Architecture | Turing | Ampere |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 2944 | 4864+65% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 10.07 TFLOPS | 16.2 TFLOPS+61% |
| Boost Clock | 1710 MHz+3% | 1665 MHz |
| ROPs | 64 | 80+25% |
| TMUs | 184+21% | 152 |
| L1 Cache | 2.9 MB | 4.8 MB+66% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 4 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 46+21% | 38 |
| Tensor Cores | 368+142% | 152 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2050 | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | DLSS 2 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 2050 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti has 8 GB. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 112 GB/s (GeForce RTX 2050) vs 448 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) — a 300% advantage for the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti. Bus width: 64-bit vs 256-bit.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2050 | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 8 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 112 GB/s | 448 GB/s+300% |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 256-bit+300% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 4 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 2050) vs 12 Ultimate (12_2) (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2050 | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2+2% | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 8.0 (GeForce RTX 2050) vs NVENC (Ampere) (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP11 vs NVDEC (Ampere). Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (GeForce RTX 2050) vs H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2050 | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 8.0 | NVENC (Ampere) |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP11 | NVDEC (Ampere) |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) | H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 2050 draws 215W versus the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti's 200W — a 7.2% difference. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce RTX 2050) vs 600W (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti). Power connectors: 6-pin vs 8-pin. Card length: 0mm vs 242mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2050 | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 215W | 200W-7% |
| Recommended PSU | 300W-50% | 600W |
| Power Connector | 6-pin | 8-pin |
| Length | 0mm | 242mm |
| Height | 0mm | 112mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 75 |
| Perf/Watt | 35.9 | 101.6+183% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 2050 launched at $150 MSRP, while the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti launched at $399. The GeForce RTX 2050 costs 62.4% less ($249 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 51.4 (GeForce RTX 2050) vs 50.9 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) — the GeForce RTX 2050 offers 1% better value. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2018).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2050 | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $150-62% | $399 |
| Performance per Dollar | 51.4 | 50.9 |
| Codename | TU104 | GA104 |
| Release | September 20 2018 | December 1 2020 |
| Ranking | #94 | #73 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












