G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce GTX TITAN X

2015

Why buy it

✅4.5% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 8 GB).

Trade-offs

❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
❌Poor future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 12 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
❌
301.2% HIGHER MSRP
$999 MSRPvs$249 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 12.6 vs 47.8 G3D/$ ($999 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
❌92.3% higher power demand at 250W vs 130W.

GeForce RTX 3050 OEM

2022

Why buy it

✅Costs $750 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
✅Delivers 278% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 47.8 vs 12.6 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
✅Draws 130W instead of 250W, a 120W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX TITAN X across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.

GeForce GTX TITAN X

2015

GeForce RTX 3050 OEM

2022

Why buy it

✅4.5% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 8 GB).

Why buy it

✅Costs $750 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
✅Delivers 278% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 47.8 vs 12.6 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
✅Draws 130W instead of 250W, a 120W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
❌Poor future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 12 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
❌
301.2% HIGHER MSRP
$999 MSRPvs$249 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 12.6 vs 47.8 G3D/$ ($999 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
❌92.3% higher power demand at 250W vs 130W.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX TITAN X across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.

Quick Answers

So, is GeForce GTX TITAN X better than GeForce RTX 3050 OEM?

Yes. GeForce GTX TITAN X is clearly the better overall GPU here. GeForce GTX TITAN X averages 4.5% more FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. You are also looking at 12,621 vs 11,892 in G3D Mark. On top of that, GeForce GTX TITAN X is a 2015 card with no meaningful modern upscaling stack, while GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is a 2022 model from an older generation with DLSS Super Resolution. So this is not really a tight same-tier comparison. It is more a modern card against an older, weaker alternative.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2022 generation instead of 2015, better upscaling support with DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, and a 8nm process instead of 28nm. That broader feature stack should age better as more games lean on modern upscaling and frame-generation support.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

GeForce GTX TITAN X is the smarter buy by a wide margin. GeForce GTX TITAN X is about 301.2% more expensive on MSRP at $999 MSRP versus $249 MSRP, and you are getting 4.5% more estimated average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and 6.1% higher G3D Mark. GeForce RTX 3050 OEM really only makes sense now as a very cheap stopgap or a used-market placeholder.

When does GeForce RTX 3050 OEM make more sense than GeForce GTX TITAN X?

Yes. GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is still an excellent gaming GPU in 2026: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. It makes more sense if your priority is newer architecture, lower power draw (130W vs 250W), future-proofing, and staying closer to $249 MSRP more than squeezing out the extra headroom of GeForce GTX TITAN X. The trade-off is that GeForce GTX TITAN X currently gives you 6.1% higher G3D Mark and 4.5% more estimated average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. GeForce RTX 3050 OEM still holds the G3D-per-dollar lead, so the performance win comes with a real value premium.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce GTX TITAN X Benchmark Check

GeForce RTX 3050 OEM Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	GeForce GTX TITAN X	GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
1080p
low	121 FPS	130 FPS
medium	103 FPS	113 FPS
high	88 FPS	99 FPS
ultra	59 FPS	83 FPS
1440p
low	98 FPS	119 FPS
medium	82 FPS	96 FPS
high	64 FPS	81 FPS
ultra	43 FPS	69 FPS
4K
low	38 FPS	64 FPS
medium	34 FPS	57 FPS
high	21 FPS	39 FPS
ultra	18 FPS	33 FPS

Open GeForce GTX TITAN X Open GeForce RTX 3050 OEM

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	GeForce GTX TITAN X	GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
1080p
low	187 FPS	239 FPS
medium	166 FPS	206 FPS
high	135 FPS	164 FPS
ultra	104 FPS	128 FPS
1440p
low	128 FPS	163 FPS
medium	104 FPS	135 FPS
high	82 FPS	112 FPS
ultra	62 FPS	92 FPS
4K
low	60 FPS	88 FPS
medium	50 FPS	74 FPS
high	46 FPS	62 FPS
ultra	37 FPS	49 FPS

Open GeForce GTX TITAN X Open GeForce RTX 3050 OEM

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	GeForce GTX TITAN X	GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
1080p
low	568 FPS	535 FPS
medium	454 FPS	428 FPS
high	379 FPS	357 FPS
ultra	284 FPS	268 FPS
1440p
low	426 FPS	401 FPS
medium	341 FPS	321 FPS
high	284 FPS	268 FPS
ultra	213 FPS	201 FPS
4K
low	284 FPS	268 FPS
medium	227 FPS	214 FPS
high	189 FPS	178 FPS
ultra	142 FPS	134 FPS

Open GeForce GTX TITAN X Open GeForce RTX 3050 OEM

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	GeForce GTX TITAN X	GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
1080p
low	235 FPS	467 FPS
medium	204 FPS	414 FPS
high	167 FPS	335 FPS
ultra	140 FPS	268 FPS
1440p
low	179 FPS	372 FPS
medium	157 FPS	321 FPS
high	125 FPS	236 FPS
ultra	102 FPS	197 FPS
4K
low	102 FPS	199 FPS
medium	83 FPS	175 FPS
high	67 FPS	150 FPS
ultra	53 FPS	125 FPS

Open GeForce GTX TITAN X Open GeForce RTX 3050 OEM

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX TITAN X and GeForce RTX 3050 OEM

GeForce GTX TITAN X

The GeForce GTX TITAN X is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 17 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1075 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,621 points. Launch price was $999.

GeForce RTX 3050 OEM

The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 4 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1515 MHz to 1755 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 20 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,892 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX TITAN X scores 12,621 versus the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM's 11,892 — the GeForce GTX TITAN X leads by 6.1%. The GeForce GTX TITAN X is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM uses Ampere, both on 28 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 3,072 (GeForce GTX TITAN X) vs 2,560 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM). Raw compute: 6.691 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX TITAN X) vs 8.986 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM). Boost clocks: 1075 MHz vs 1755 MHz.

Feature	GeForce GTX TITAN X	GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
G3D Mark Score	12,621+6%	11,892
Architecture	Maxwell 2.0	Ampere
Process Node	28 nm	8 nm
Shading Units	3072+20%	2560
Compute (TFLOPS)	6.691 TFLOPS	8.986 TFLOPS+34%
Boost Clock	1075 MHz	1755 MHz+63%
ROPs	96+200%	32
TMUs	192+140%	80
L1 Cache	1.1 MB	2.5 MB+127%
L2 Cache	3 MB+50%	2 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM supports the newer DLSS 2 Super Resolution, whereas the GeForce GTX TITAN X is capped at Upscaling support.

Feature	GeForce GTX TITAN X	GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	DLSS 2 Super Resolution
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	NVIDIA Reflex

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX TITAN X comes with 12 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM has 8 GB. The GeForce GTX TITAN X offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 336 GB/s (GeForce GTX TITAN X) vs 224 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) — a 50% advantage for the GeForce GTX TITAN X. Bus width: 384-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 3 MB (GeForce GTX TITAN X) vs 2 MB (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) — the GeForce GTX TITAN X has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GTX TITAN X	GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
VRAM Capacity	12 GB+50%	8 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Memory Bandwidth	336 GB/s+50%	224 GB/s
Bus Width	384-bit+200%	128-bit
L2 Cache	3 MB+50%	2 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (FL 12_1) (GeForce GTX TITAN X) vs 12.2 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	GeForce GTX TITAN X	GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
DirectX	12 (FL 12_1)	12.2+2%
Vulkan	1.3	1.3
OpenGL	4.5	4.6+2%
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 2nd gen (GeForce GTX TITAN X) vs 8th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM). Decoder: NVDEC 2nd gen vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC (GeForce GTX TITAN X) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM).

Feature	GeForce GTX TITAN X	GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
Encoder	NVENC 2nd gen	8th Gen NVENC
Decoder	NVDEC 2nd gen	5th Gen NVDEC
Codecs	H.264,H.265/HEVC	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode)

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX TITAN X draws 250W versus the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM's 130W — a 63.2% difference. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 600W (GeForce GTX TITAN X) vs 450W (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM). Power connectors: 6-pin + 8-pin vs 8-pin. Card length: 267mm vs 235mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 83°C vs 75°C.

Feature	GeForce GTX TITAN X	GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
TDP	250W	130W-48%
Recommended PSU	600W	450W-25%
Power Connector	6-pin + 8-pin	8-pin
Length	267mm	235mm
Height	111mm	124mm
Slots	2	2
Temp (Load)	83°C	75°C-10%
Perf/Watt	50.5	91.5+81%

💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce GTX TITAN X launched at $999 MSRP, while the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM launched at $249. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM costs 75.1% less ($750 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 12.6 (GeForce GTX TITAN X) vs 47.8 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) — the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM offers 279.4% better value. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2015).