
GeForce GTX 1660
Popular choices:

GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 1660
2019Why buy it
- ✅Costs $30 less on MSRP ($219 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 11.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 53.1 vs 47.8 G3D/$ ($219 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
- ✅Measures 229mm instead of 235mm, a 6mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 6 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
2022Why buy it
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 6 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌13.7% HIGHER MSRP$249 MSRPvs$219 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 47.8 vs 53.1 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $219 MSRP).
GeForce GTX 1660
2019GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
2022Why buy it
- ✅Costs $30 less on MSRP ($219 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 11.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 53.1 vs 47.8 G3D/$ ($219 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
- ✅Measures 229mm instead of 235mm, a 6mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Why buy it
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 6 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 6 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
Trade-offs
- ❌13.7% HIGHER MSRP$249 MSRPvs$219 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 47.8 vs 53.1 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $219 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 3050 OEM better than GeForce GTX 1660?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is GeForce GTX 1660 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1660 | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 125 FPS | 130 FPS |
| medium | 112 FPS | 113 FPS |
| high | 96 FPS | 99 FPS |
| ultra | 72 FPS | 83 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 115 FPS | 119 FPS |
| medium | 98 FPS | 96 FPS |
| high | 83 FPS | 81 FPS |
| ultra | 62 FPS | 69 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 51 FPS | 64 FPS |
| medium | 47 FPS | 57 FPS |
| high | 35 FPS | 39 FPS |
| ultra | 31 FPS | 33 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1660 | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 206 FPS | 239 FPS |
| medium | 174 FPS | 206 FPS |
| high | 143 FPS | 164 FPS |
| ultra | 102 FPS | 128 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 132 FPS | 163 FPS |
| medium | 105 FPS | 135 FPS |
| high | 85 FPS | 112 FPS |
| ultra | 64 FPS | 92 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 61 FPS | 88 FPS |
| medium | 49 FPS | 74 FPS |
| high | 47 FPS | 62 FPS |
| ultra | 38 FPS | 49 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1660 | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 524 FPS | 535 FPS |
| medium | 419 FPS | 428 FPS |
| high | 349 FPS | 357 FPS |
| ultra | 262 FPS | 268 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 393 FPS | 401 FPS |
| medium | 314 FPS | 321 FPS |
| high | 262 FPS | 268 FPS |
| ultra | 196 FPS | 201 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 262 FPS | 268 FPS |
| medium | 210 FPS | 214 FPS |
| high | 175 FPS | 178 FPS |
| ultra | 131 FPS | 134 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1660 | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 394 FPS | 467 FPS |
| medium | 328 FPS | 414 FPS |
| high | 271 FPS | 335 FPS |
| ultra | 233 FPS | 268 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 314 FPS | 372 FPS |
| medium | 261 FPS | 321 FPS |
| high | 205 FPS | 236 FPS |
| ultra | 166 FPS | 197 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 159 FPS | 199 FPS |
| medium | 122 FPS | 175 FPS |
| high | 110 FPS | 150 FPS |
| ultra | 88 FPS | 125 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1660 and GeForce RTX 3050 OEM

GeForce GTX 1660
GeForce GTX 1660
The GeForce GTX 1660 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 14 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1530 MHz to 1785 MHz. It has 1408 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 120W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,639 points. Launch price was $219.

GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 4 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1515 MHz to 1755 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 20 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,892 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 1660 scores 11,639 and the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM reaches 11,892 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 1660 is built on Turing while the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM uses Ampere, both on 12 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 1,408 (GeForce GTX 1660) vs 2,560 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM). Raw compute: 5.027 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1660) vs 8.986 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM). Boost clocks: 1785 MHz vs 1755 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1660 | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 11,639 | 11,892+2% |
| Architecture | Turing | Ampere |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 1408 | 2560+82% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 5.027 TFLOPS | 8.986 TFLOPS+79% |
| Boost Clock | 1785 MHz+2% | 1755 MHz |
| ROPs | 48+50% | 32 |
| TMUs | 88+10% | 80 |
| L1 Cache | 1.4 MB | 2.5 MB+79% |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB | 2 MB+33% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM supports the newer DLSS 2 Super Resolution, whereas the GeForce GTX 1660 is capped at Upscaling support.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1660 | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | DLSS 2 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 1660 comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM has 8 GB. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM offers 33.3% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 192 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1660) vs 224 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) — a 16.7% advantage for the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM. Bus width: 192-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 1.5 MB (GeForce GTX 1660) vs 2 MB (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) — the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1660 | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB | 8 GB+33% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 192 GB/s | 224 GB/s+17% |
| Bus Width | 192-bit+50% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB | 2 MB+33% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (GeForce GTX 1660) vs 12.2 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1660 | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 7th Gen NVENC (GeForce GTX 1660) vs 8th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1660) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1660 | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 7th Gen NVENC | 8th Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1660 draws 120W versus the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM's 130W — a 8% difference. The GeForce GTX 1660 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 450W (GeForce GTX 1660) vs 450W (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM). Power connectors: 8-pin vs 8-pin. Card length: 229mm vs 235mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1660 | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 120W-8% | 130W |
| Recommended PSU | 450W | 450W |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | 8-pin |
| Length | 229mm | 235mm |
| Height | 111mm | 124mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 97.0+6% | 91.5 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 1660 launched at $219 MSRP, while the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM launched at $249. The GeForce GTX 1660 costs 12% less ($30 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 53.1 (GeForce GTX 1660) vs 47.8 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) — the GeForce GTX 1660 offers 11.1% better value. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2019).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1660 | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $219-12% | $249 |
| Performance per Dollar | 53.1+11% | 47.8 |
| Codename | TU116 | GA106 |
| Release | March 14 2019 | January 4 2022 |
| Ranking | #231 | #224 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













