
GeForce GTX 1080
Popular choices:

GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 1080
2016Why buy it
- ✅16.2% more average FPS across 48 tracked games in our benchmark data.
Trade-offs
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌140.6% HIGHER MSRP$599 MSRPvs$249 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 26.1 vs 47.8 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
- ❌38.5% higher power demand at 180W vs 130W.
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
2022Why buy it
- ✅Costs $350 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 83.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 47.8 vs 26.1 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 130W instead of 180W, a 50W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 1080 across 48 tracked games in our benchmark data.
GeForce GTX 1080
2016GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
2022Why buy it
- ✅16.2% more average FPS across 48 tracked games in our benchmark data.
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $350 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 83.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 47.8 vs 26.1 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 130W instead of 180W, a 50W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌140.6% HIGHER MSRP$599 MSRPvs$249 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 26.1 vs 47.8 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
- ❌38.5% higher power demand at 180W vs 130W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 1080 across 48 tracked games in our benchmark data.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce GTX 1080 better than GeForce RTX 3050 OEM?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does GeForce RTX 3050 OEM make more sense than GeForce GTX 1080?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1080 | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 153 FPS | 130 FPS |
| medium | 135 FPS | 113 FPS |
| high | 120 FPS | 99 FPS |
| ultra | 102 FPS | 83 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 131 FPS | 119 FPS |
| medium | 106 FPS | 96 FPS |
| high | 94 FPS | 81 FPS |
| ultra | 85 FPS | 69 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 77 FPS | 64 FPS |
| medium | 65 FPS | 57 FPS |
| high | 52 FPS | 39 FPS |
| ultra | 45 FPS | 33 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1080 | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 289 FPS | 239 FPS |
| medium | 242 FPS | 206 FPS |
| high | 181 FPS | 164 FPS |
| ultra | 147 FPS | 128 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 186 FPS | 163 FPS |
| medium | 158 FPS | 135 FPS |
| high | 127 FPS | 112 FPS |
| ultra | 103 FPS | 92 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 106 FPS | 88 FPS |
| medium | 88 FPS | 74 FPS |
| high | 73 FPS | 62 FPS |
| ultra | 57 FPS | 49 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1080 | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 702 FPS | 535 FPS |
| medium | 562 FPS | 428 FPS |
| high | 468 FPS | 357 FPS |
| ultra | 351 FPS | 268 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 527 FPS | 401 FPS |
| medium | 421 FPS | 321 FPS |
| high | 351 FPS | 268 FPS |
| ultra | 263 FPS | 201 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 351 FPS | 268 FPS |
| medium | 281 FPS | 214 FPS |
| high | 234 FPS | 178 FPS |
| ultra | 176 FPS | 134 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1080 | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 399 FPS | 467 FPS |
| medium | 334 FPS | 414 FPS |
| high | 281 FPS | 335 FPS |
| ultra | 241 FPS | 268 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 332 FPS | 372 FPS |
| medium | 277 FPS | 321 FPS |
| high | 220 FPS | 236 FPS |
| ultra | 182 FPS | 197 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 180 FPS | 199 FPS |
| medium | 141 FPS | 175 FPS |
| high | 129 FPS | 150 FPS |
| ultra | 106 FPS | 125 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1080 and GeForce RTX 3050 OEM

GeForce GTX 1080
GeForce GTX 1080
The GeForce GTX 1080 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1607 MHz to 1733 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 15,609 points. Launch price was $599.

GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 4 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1515 MHz to 1755 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 20 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,892 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1080 scores 15,609 versus the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM's 11,892 — the GeForce GTX 1080 leads by 31.3%. The GeForce GTX 1080 is built on Pascal while the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM uses Ampere, both on 16 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (GeForce GTX 1080) vs 2,560 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM). Raw compute: 8.873 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1080) vs 8.986 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM). Boost clocks: 1733 MHz vs 1755 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1080 | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 15,609+31% | 11,892 |
| Architecture | Pascal | Ampere |
| Process Node | 16 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560 | 2560 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 8.873 TFLOPS | 8.986 TFLOPS+1% |
| Boost Clock | 1733 MHz | 1755 MHz+1% |
| ROPs | 64+100% | 32 |
| TMUs | 160+100% | 80 |
| L1 Cache | 0.94 MB | 2.5 MB+166% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM supports the newer DLSS 2 Super Resolution, whereas the GeForce GTX 1080 is capped at Upscaling support.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1080 | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | DLSS 2 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 8 GB of video memory. Memory bandwidth: 320 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1080) vs 224 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) — a 42.9% advantage for the GeForce GTX 1080. Bus width: 256-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1080 | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5X | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 320 GB/s+43% | 224 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+100% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (GeForce GTX 1080) vs 12.2 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1080 | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.4+8% | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 6th gen (GeForce GTX 1080) vs 8th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM). Decoder: NVDEC 3rd gen vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce GTX 1080) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1080 | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 6th gen | 8th Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | NVDEC 3rd gen | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9,MPEG-2,VC-1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1080 draws 180W versus the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM's 130W — a 32.3% difference. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GeForce GTX 1080) vs 450W (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM). Power connectors: 8-pin vs 8-pin. Card length: 267mm vs 235mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1080 | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 180W | 130W-28% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 450W-10% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | 8-pin |
| Length | 267mm | 235mm |
| Height | 111mm | 124mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 86.7 | 91.5+6% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 1080 launched at $599 MSRP, while the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM launched at $249. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM costs 58.4% less ($350 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 26.1 (GeForce GTX 1080) vs 47.8 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) — the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM offers 83.1% better value. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2016).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1080 | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $599 | $249-58% |
| Performance per Dollar | 26.1 | 47.8+83% |
| Codename | GP104 | GA106 |
| Release | May 27 2016 | January 4 2022 |
| Ranking | #137 | #224 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













