G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design

2020

Why buy it

✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 6 GB).

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than RTX 1000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU across 48 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (320 vs 400), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
❌Weaker long-term outlook: RTX 1000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
❌128.6% higher power demand at 80W vs 35W.

RTX 1000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU

2023

Why buy it

✅39.0% more average FPS across 48 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅25% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (400 vs 320).
✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
✅Draws 35W instead of 80W, a 45W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.

GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design

2020

RTX 1000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU

2023

Why buy it

✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 6 GB).

Why buy it

✅39.0% more average FPS across 48 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅25% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (400 vs 320).
✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
✅Draws 35W instead of 80W, a 45W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than RTX 1000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU across 48 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (320 vs 400), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
❌Weaker long-term outlook: RTX 1000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
❌128.6% higher power demand at 80W vs 35W.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.

Quick Answers

So, is RTX 1000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU better than GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design?

Yes. RTX 1000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU is the better GPU overall here. You are getting 39.0% more average FPS across 48 tracked games in our benchmark data, 0.5% higher PassMark G3D performance, and 400 vs 320 Tensor cores. It also comes from 2023 instead of 2020, which helps its case as the more complete modern gaming card.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

RTX 1000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2023 generation instead of 2020, the stronger feature stack with no meaningful modern upscaling stack instead of DLSS Super Resolution, and a 5nm process instead of 12nm. That broader feature stack should age better as more games lean on modern upscaling and frame-generation support.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

RTX 1000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU is priced in an unclear MSRP range at an unclear MSRP versus an unclear MSRP, and you are getting 39.0% more estimated average FPS across 48 tracked games in our benchmark data and 0.5% higher G3D Mark. G3D-per-dollar is basically tied between them. If you are comfortable paying the premium for the stronger gaming result, RTX 1000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU is the one to buy. If staying closer to budget matters more, GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design still makes more sense on price alone and remains capable enough for modern gaming.

Is GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design still worth buying for gaming in 2026?

Yes. GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design is still a strong gaming GPU in 2026: it is very strong for 1080p, good for 1440p, and more limited at 4K. This mostly comes down to price. If you want to stay closer to an unclear MSRP, it remains a strong choice; if you are comfortable paying more, RTX 1000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU earns that extra money with a clearly stronger gaming result and a more complete overall package.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design Benchmark Check

RTX 1000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design	RTX 1000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU
1080p
low	111 FPS	135 FPS
medium	93 FPS	117 FPS
high	78 FPS	100 FPS
ultra	52 FPS	67 FPS
1440p
low	94 FPS	112 FPS
medium	79 FPS	96 FPS
high	59 FPS	75 FPS
ultra	38 FPS	49 FPS
4K
low	39 FPS	49 FPS
medium	35 FPS	44 FPS
high	22 FPS	32 FPS
ultra	18 FPS	27 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design Open RTX 1000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design	RTX 1000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU
1080p
low	252 FPS	530 FPS
medium	213 FPS	439 FPS
high	179 FPS	344 FPS
ultra	154 FPS	297 FPS
1440p
low	197 FPS	436 FPS
medium	163 FPS	362 FPS
high	137 FPS	294 FPS
ultra	112 FPS	228 FPS
4K
low	115 FPS	258 FPS
medium	98 FPS	221 FPS
high	79 FPS	199 FPS
ultra	58 FPS	152 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design Open RTX 1000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design	RTX 1000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU
1080p
low	605 FPS	608 FPS
medium	484 FPS	486 FPS
high	403 FPS	405 FPS
ultra	302 FPS	304 FPS
1440p
low	454 FPS	456 FPS
medium	363 FPS	365 FPS
high	302 FPS	304 FPS
ultra	227 FPS	228 FPS
4K
low	302 FPS	304 FPS
medium	242 FPS	243 FPS
high	202 FPS	203 FPS
ultra	151 FPS	152 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design Open RTX 1000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design	RTX 1000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU
1080p
low	247 FPS	367 FPS
medium	214 FPS	322 FPS
high	172 FPS	282 FPS
ultra	146 FPS	245 FPS
1440p
low	189 FPS	278 FPS
medium	167 FPS	250 FPS
high	131 FPS	215 FPS
ultra	108 FPS	183 FPS
4K
low	112 FPS	185 FPS
medium	94 FPS	159 FPS
high	76 FPS	121 FPS
ultra	58 FPS	99 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design Open RTX 1000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design and RTX 1000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU

GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design

The GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 2 2020. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 930 MHz to 1155 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 80W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 40 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,444 points.

RTX 1000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU

The RTX 1000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 9 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1155 MHz to 2025 MHz. It has 12800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 35W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 100 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,508 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design scores 13,444 and the RTX 1000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU reaches 13,508 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design is built on Turing while the RTX 1000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU uses Ada Lovelace, both on 12 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design) vs 12,800 (RTX 1000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU). Raw compute: 5.914 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design) vs 65.28 TFLOPS (RTX 1000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU). Boost clocks: 1155 MHz vs 2025 MHz. Ray tracing: 40 RT cores (GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design) vs 100 (RTX 1000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU) with 320 Tensor cores vs 400.

Feature	GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design	RTX 1000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU
G3D Mark Score	13,444	13,508
Architecture	Turing	Ada Lovelace
Process Node	12 nm	5 nm
Shading Units	2560	12800+400%
Compute (TFLOPS)	5.914 TFLOPS	65.28 TFLOPS+1004%
Boost Clock	1155 MHz	2025 MHz+75%
ROPs	64	176+175%
TMUs	160	400+150%
L1 Cache	2.5 MB	12.5 MB+400%
L2 Cache	4 MB	72 MB+1700%
Ray Tracing Cores	40	100+150%
Tensor Cores	320	400+25%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The RTX 1000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU supports the newer Upscaling support, whereas the GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design is capped at DLSS 2 Super Resolution.

Feature	GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design	RTX 1000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU
Upscaling Tech	DLSS 2 Super Resolution	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	NVIDIA Reflex

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the RTX 1000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU has 6 GB. The GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design offers 33.3% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design) vs 72 MB (RTX 1000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU) — the RTX 1000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design	RTX 1000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU
VRAM Capacity	8 GB+33%	6 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Bus Width	256-bit+100%	128-bit
L2 Cache	4 MB	72 MB+1700%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design) vs 12 Ultimate (12_2) (RTX 1000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design	RTX 1000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU
DirectX	12 Ultimate	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Vulkan	1.3	1.3
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 7th Gen (GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design) vs NVENC 8th Gen (RTX 1000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU). Decoder: NVDEC 4th Gen vs NVDEC 5th Gen. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design) vs H.264,H.265 (HEVC),AV1,VP9,MPEG-2,VC-1 (RTX 1000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU).

Feature	GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design	RTX 1000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU
Encoder	NVENC 7th Gen	NVENC 8th Gen
Decoder	NVDEC 4th Gen	NVDEC 5th Gen
Codecs	H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1	H.264,H.265 (HEVC),AV1,VP9,MPEG-2,VC-1

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design draws 80W versus the RTX 1000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU's 35W — a 78.3% difference. The RTX 1000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design) vs 500W (RTX 1000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 0mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 75 vs 85.