
Radeon RX 580X
Popular choices:

RadeonT 780M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Radeon RX 580X
2018Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 32.7 vs 0 G3D/$ ($229 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 8 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌1133.3% higher power demand at 185W vs 15W.
RadeonT 780M
2024Why buy it
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 185W, a 170W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 32.7 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $229 MSRP).
Radeon RX 580X
2018RadeonT 780M
2024Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 32.7 vs 0 G3D/$ ($229 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
Why buy it
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 185W, a 170W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 8 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌1133.3% higher power demand at 185W vs 15W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 32.7 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $229 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon RX 580X better than RadeonT 780M?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does RadeonT 780M make more sense than Radeon RX 580X?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Radeon RX 580X | RadeonT 780M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 146 FPS | 93 FPS |
| medium | 129 FPS | 78 FPS |
| high | 110 FPS | 65 FPS |
| ultra | 81 FPS | 43 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 133 FPS | 80 FPS |
| medium | 111 FPS | 68 FPS |
| high | 86 FPS | 51 FPS |
| ultra | 64 FPS | 32 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 59 FPS | 29 FPS |
| medium | 52 FPS | 27 FPS |
| high | 33 FPS | 18 FPS |
| ultra | 29 FPS | 16 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Radeon RX 580X | RadeonT 780M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 159 FPS | 98 FPS |
| medium | 137 FPS | 68 FPS |
| high | 119 FPS | 48 FPS |
| ultra | 93 FPS | 33 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 92 FPS | 67 FPS |
| medium | 73 FPS | 45 FPS |
| high | 57 FPS | 33 FPS |
| ultra | 46 FPS | 24 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 37 FPS | 35 FPS |
| medium | 29 FPS | 25 FPS |
| high | 24 FPS | 19 FPS |
| ultra | 19 FPS | 13 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Radeon RX 580X | RadeonT 780M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 337 FPS | 319 FPS |
| medium | 270 FPS | 256 FPS |
| high | 225 FPS | 213 FPS |
| ultra | 169 FPS | 160 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 253 FPS | 240 FPS |
| medium | 202 FPS | 192 FPS |
| high | 169 FPS | 160 FPS |
| ultra | 126 FPS | 120 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 169 FPS | 159 FPS |
| medium | 135 FPS | 128 FPS |
| high | 112 FPS | 104 FPS |
| ultra | 84 FPS | 77 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Radeon RX 580X | RadeonT 780M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 317 FPS | 214 FPS |
| medium | 270 FPS | 171 FPS |
| high | 225 FPS | 146 FPS |
| ultra | 169 FPS | 108 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 253 FPS | 142 FPS |
| medium | 202 FPS | 117 FPS |
| high | 164 FPS | 101 FPS |
| ultra | 126 FPS | 75 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 137 FPS | 83 FPS |
| medium | 107 FPS | 67 FPS |
| high | 89 FPS | 54 FPS |
| ultra | 75 FPS | 38 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon RX 580X and RadeonT 780M

Radeon RX 580X
Radeon RX 580X
The Radeon RX 580X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 11 2018. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1257 MHz to 1340 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 185W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,495 points.

RadeonT 780M
RadeonT 780M
The RadeonT 780M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 31 2024. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 800 MHz to 2900 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 12 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,098 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Radeon RX 580X scores 7,495 versus the RadeonT 780M's 7,098 — the Radeon RX 580X leads by 5.6%. The Radeon RX 580X is built on GCN 4.0 while the RadeonT 780M uses RDNA 3.0, both on 14 nm vs 4 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (Radeon RX 580X) vs 768 (RadeonT 780M). Raw compute: 6.175 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 580X) vs 8.909 TFLOPS (RadeonT 780M). Boost clocks: 1340 MHz vs 2900 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon RX 580X | RadeonT 780M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 7,495+6% | 7,098 |
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | RDNA 3.0 |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 4 nm |
| Shading Units | 2304+200% | 768 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 6.175 TFLOPS | 8.909 TFLOPS+44% |
| Boost Clock | 1340 MHz | 2900 MHz+116% |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 144+200% | 48 |
| L1 Cache | 576 KB+125% | 256 KB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
| Frame Generation | FSR upscaling + limited Frame Generation | FSR upscaling + RSR |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 580X is support for FSR Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The RadeonT 780M lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.
| Feature | Radeon RX 580X | RadeonT 780M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | FSR Frame Generation | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon RX 580X comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the RadeonT 780M has 4 GB. The Radeon RX 580X offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | Radeon RX 580X | RadeonT 780M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB+100% | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+100% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (FL 12_0) (Radeon RX 580X) vs 12.2 (RadeonT 780M). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon RX 580X | RadeonT 780M |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (FL 12_0) | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 3.4 (Radeon RX 580X) vs VCN 4.0 (RadeonT 780M). Decoder: UVD 6.3 vs VCN 4.0. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC (Radeon RX 580X) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (RadeonT 780M).
| Feature | Radeon RX 580X | RadeonT 780M |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 3.4 | VCN 4.0 |
| Decoder | UVD 6.3 | VCN 4.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon RX 580X draws 185W versus the RadeonT 780M's 15W — a 170% difference. The RadeonT 780M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Radeon RX 580X) vs 350W (RadeonT 780M). Power connectors: 8-pin vs None. Card length: 241mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots.
| Feature | Radeon RX 580X | RadeonT 780M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 185W | 15W-92% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 350W-30% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | None |
| Length | 241mm | 0mm |
| Height | 111mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Perf/Watt | 40.5 | 473.2+1068% |
Value Analysis
The RadeonT 780M is the newer GPU (2024 vs 2018).
| Feature | Radeon RX 580X | RadeonT 780M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $229 | — |
| Codename | Polaris 20 | Phoenix |
| Release | April 11 2018 | January 31 2024 |
| Ranking | #337 | #359 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












