
Radeon RX 580X
Popular choices:

T1000
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Radeon RX 580X
2018Why buy it
- ✅Costs $121 less on MSRP ($229 MSRP vs $350 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 49.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 32.7 vs 21.9 G3D/$ ($229 MSRP vs $350 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 8 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌270% higher power demand at 185W vs 50W.
- ❌54.5% longer card at 241mm vs 156mm.
T1000
2021Why buy it
- ✅More future proof: Turing (2018−2022) on 12nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 50W instead of 185W, a 135W reduction.
- ✅Measures 156mm instead of 241mm, a 85mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌52.8% HIGHER MSRP$350 MSRPvs$229 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 21.9 vs 32.7 G3D/$ ($350 MSRP vs $229 MSRP).
Radeon RX 580X
2018T1000
2021Why buy it
- ✅Costs $121 less on MSRP ($229 MSRP vs $350 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 49.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 32.7 vs 21.9 G3D/$ ($229 MSRP vs $350 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
Why buy it
- ✅More future proof: Turing (2018−2022) on 12nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 50W instead of 185W, a 135W reduction.
- ✅Measures 156mm instead of 241mm, a 85mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 8 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌270% higher power demand at 185W vs 50W.
- ❌54.5% longer card at 241mm vs 156mm.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌52.8% HIGHER MSRP$350 MSRPvs$229 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 21.9 vs 32.7 G3D/$ ($350 MSRP vs $229 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is T1000 better than Radeon RX 580X?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon RX 580X still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Radeon RX 580X | T1000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 113 FPS | 104 FPS |
| medium | 100 FPS | 89 FPS |
| high | 86 FPS | 74 FPS |
| ultra | 70 FPS | 44 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 105 FPS | 90 FPS |
| medium | 87 FPS | 78 FPS |
| high | 68 FPS | 57 FPS |
| ultra | 56 FPS | 33 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 53 FPS | 29 FPS |
| medium | 47 FPS | 27 FPS |
| high | 30 FPS | 18 FPS |
| ultra | 26 FPS | 16 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Radeon RX 580X | T1000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 151 FPS | 170 FPS |
| medium | 131 FPS | 145 FPS |
| high | 115 FPS | 115 FPS |
| ultra | 89 FPS | 90 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 90 FPS | 121 FPS |
| medium | 73 FPS | 99 FPS |
| high | 58 FPS | 78 FPS |
| ultra | 46 FPS | 61 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 37 FPS | 73 FPS |
| medium | 30 FPS | 60 FPS |
| high | 25 FPS | 46 FPS |
| ultra | 20 FPS | 32 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Radeon RX 580X | T1000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 337 FPS | 333 FPS |
| medium | 270 FPS | 275 FPS |
| high | 225 FPS | 229 FPS |
| ultra | 169 FPS | 172 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 253 FPS | 243 FPS |
| medium | 202 FPS | 207 FPS |
| high | 169 FPS | 172 FPS |
| ultra | 126 FPS | 129 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 169 FPS | 150 FPS |
| medium | 135 FPS | 137 FPS |
| high | 112 FPS | 99 FPS |
| ultra | 84 FPS | 66 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Radeon RX 580X | T1000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 317 FPS | 179 FPS |
| medium | 270 FPS | 147 FPS |
| high | 225 FPS | 129 FPS |
| ultra | 169 FPS | 103 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 253 FPS | 124 FPS |
| medium | 202 FPS | 103 FPS |
| high | 164 FPS | 89 FPS |
| ultra | 126 FPS | 70 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 137 FPS | 73 FPS |
| medium | 107 FPS | 58 FPS |
| high | 89 FPS | 47 FPS |
| ultra | 75 FPS | 34 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon RX 580X and T1000

Radeon RX 580X
Radeon RX 580X
The Radeon RX 580X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 11 2018. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1257 MHz to 1340 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 185W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,495 points.

T1000
T1000
The T1000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 6 2021. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1065 MHz to 1395 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,649 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon RX 580X scores 7,495 and the T1000 reaches 7,649 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon RX 580X is built on GCN 4.0 while the T1000 uses Turing, both on 14 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (Radeon RX 580X) vs 896 (T1000). Raw compute: 6.175 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 580X) vs 2.5 TFLOPS (T1000). Boost clocks: 1340 MHz vs 1395 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon RX 580X | T1000 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 7,495 | 7,649+2% |
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Turing |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 2304+157% | 896 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 6.175 TFLOPS+147% | 2.5 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1340 MHz | 1395 MHz+4% |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 144+157% | 56 |
| L1 Cache | 576 KB | 896 KB+56% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+100% | 1 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 580X is support for FSR Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The T1000 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.
| Feature | Radeon RX 580X | T1000 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | FSR Frame Generation | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon RX 580X comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the T1000 has 4 GB. The Radeon RX 580X offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Radeon RX 580X) vs 1 MB (T1000) — the Radeon RX 580X has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon RX 580X | T1000 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB+100% | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+100% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+100% | 1 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (FL 12_0) (Radeon RX 580X) vs 12.1 (T1000). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon RX 580X | T1000 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (FL 12_0) | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.3+8% | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 3.4 (Radeon RX 580X) vs NVENC 7.0 (T1000). Decoder: UVD 6.3 vs PureVideo HD VP9. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC (Radeon RX 580X) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (T1000).
| Feature | Radeon RX 580X | T1000 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 3.4 | NVENC 7.0 |
| Decoder | UVD 6.3 | PureVideo HD VP9 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon RX 580X draws 185W versus the T1000's 50W — a 114.9% difference. The T1000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Radeon RX 580X) vs 350W (T1000). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 241mm vs 156mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots.
| Feature | Radeon RX 580X | T1000 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 185W | 50W-73% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 350W-30% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 241mm | 156mm |
| Height | 111mm | 69mm |
| Slots | 2 | 1-50% |
| Temp (Load) | — | 70°C |
| Perf/Watt | 40.5 | 153.0+278% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon RX 580X launched at $229 MSRP, while the T1000 launched at $350. The Radeon RX 580X costs 34.6% less ($121 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 32.7 (Radeon RX 580X) vs 21.9 (T1000) — the Radeon RX 580X offers 49.3% better value. The T1000 is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2018).
| Feature | Radeon RX 580X | T1000 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $229-35% | $350 |
| Performance per Dollar | 32.7+49% | 21.9 |
| Codename | Polaris 20 | TU117 |
| Release | April 11 2018 | May 6 2021 |
| Ranking | #337 | #333 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












