
Radeon Pro W5500X
Popular choices:

RadeonT 780M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Radeon Pro W5500X
2019Why buy it
- ✅40.2% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 12.3 vs 0 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: RadeonT 780M is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌733.3% higher power demand at 125W vs 15W.
RadeonT 780M
2024Why buy it
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 125W, a 110W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon Pro W5500X across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 12.3 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
Radeon Pro W5500X
2019RadeonT 780M
2024Why buy it
- ✅40.2% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 12.3 vs 0 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
Why buy it
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 125W, a 110W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: RadeonT 780M is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌733.3% higher power demand at 125W vs 15W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon Pro W5500X across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 12.3 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon Pro W5500X better than RadeonT 780M?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does RadeonT 780M make more sense than Radeon Pro W5500X?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Radeon Pro W5500X | RadeonT 780M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 107 FPS | 93 FPS |
| medium | 91 FPS | 78 FPS |
| high | 79 FPS | 65 FPS |
| ultra | 52 FPS | 43 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 94 FPS | 80 FPS |
| medium | 78 FPS | 68 FPS |
| high | 61 FPS | 51 FPS |
| ultra | 39 FPS | 32 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 39 FPS | 29 FPS |
| medium | 35 FPS | 27 FPS |
| high | 22 FPS | 18 FPS |
| ultra | 19 FPS | 16 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Radeon Pro W5500X | RadeonT 780M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 137 FPS | 96 FPS |
| medium | 105 FPS | 67 FPS |
| high | 75 FPS | 47 FPS |
| ultra | 51 FPS | 32 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 92 FPS | 67 FPS |
| medium | 63 FPS | 45 FPS |
| high | 47 FPS | 33 FPS |
| ultra | 34 FPS | 23 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 43 FPS | 35 FPS |
| medium | 32 FPS | 25 FPS |
| high | 26 FPS | 20 FPS |
| ultra | 19 FPS | 13 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Radeon Pro W5500X | RadeonT 780M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 331 FPS | 310 FPS |
| medium | 265 FPS | 256 FPS |
| high | 221 FPS | 206 FPS |
| ultra | 165 FPS | 160 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 248 FPS | 227 FPS |
| medium | 198 FPS | 192 FPS |
| high | 165 FPS | 157 FPS |
| ultra | 124 FPS | 120 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 165 FPS | 137 FPS |
| medium | 132 FPS | 123 FPS |
| high | 110 FPS | 83 FPS |
| ultra | 83 FPS | 59 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Radeon Pro W5500X | RadeonT 780M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 231 FPS | 172 FPS |
| medium | 197 FPS | 135 FPS |
| high | 163 FPS | 112 FPS |
| ultra | 136 FPS | 88 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 178 FPS | 118 FPS |
| medium | 155 FPS | 96 FPS |
| high | 123 FPS | 81 FPS |
| ultra | 100 FPS | 64 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 94 FPS | 71 FPS |
| medium | 76 FPS | 56 FPS |
| high | 61 FPS | 44 FPS |
| ultra | 48 FPS | 33 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Pro W5500X and RadeonT 780M

Radeon Pro W5500X
Radeon Pro W5500X
The Radeon Pro W5500X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 11 2019. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1187 MHz to 1757 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 125W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,351 points. Launch price was $599.

RadeonT 780M
RadeonT 780M
The RadeonT 780M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 31 2024. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 800 MHz to 2900 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 12 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,098 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon Pro W5500X scores 7,351 and the RadeonT 780M reaches 7,098 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Pro W5500X is built on RDNA 1.0 while the RadeonT 780M uses RDNA 3.0, both on 7 nm vs 4 nm. Shader units: 1,536 (Radeon Pro W5500X) vs 768 (RadeonT 780M). Raw compute: 5.398 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro W5500X) vs 8.909 TFLOPS (RadeonT 780M). Boost clocks: 1757 MHz vs 2900 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon Pro W5500X | RadeonT 780M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 7,351+4% | 7,098 |
| Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | RDNA 3.0 |
| Process Node | 7 nm | 4 nm |
| Shading Units | 1536+100% | 768 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 5.398 TFLOPS | 8.909 TFLOPS+65% |
| Boost Clock | 1757 MHz | 2900 MHz+65% |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 96+100% | 48 |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
| Frame Generation | FSR upscaling + RSR | FSR upscaling + RSR |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon Pro W5500X | RadeonT 780M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon Pro W5500X comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the RadeonT 780M has 4 GB. The Radeon Pro W5500X offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | Radeon Pro W5500X | RadeonT 780M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB+100% | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.0 (Radeon Pro W5500X) vs 12.2 (RadeonT 780M). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 5 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon Pro W5500X | RadeonT 780M |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.0 | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 5+25% | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCN 2.0 (Radeon Pro W5500X) vs VCN 4.0 (RadeonT 780M). Decoder: VCN 2.0 vs VCN 4.0. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265 (Radeon Pro W5500X) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (RadeonT 780M).
| Feature | Radeon Pro W5500X | RadeonT 780M |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCN 2.0 | VCN 4.0 |
| Decoder | VCN 2.0 | VCN 4.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon Pro W5500X draws 125W versus the RadeonT 780M's 15W — a 157.1% difference. The RadeonT 780M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon Pro W5500X) vs 350W (RadeonT 780M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None.
| Feature | Radeon Pro W5500X | RadeonT 780M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 125W | 15W-88% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | None |
| Length | — | 0mm |
| Height | — | 0mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Perf/Watt | 58.8 | 473.2+705% |
Value Analysis
The RadeonT 780M is the newer GPU (2024 vs 2019).
| Feature | Radeon Pro W5500X | RadeonT 780M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $599 | — |
| Codename | Navi 14 | Phoenix |
| Release | December 11 2019 | January 31 2024 |
| Ranking | #345 | #359 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












