Quadro P4000 (móvel) vs RadeonT 780M

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

Quadro P4000 (móvel)

2017

Why buy it

✅43.7% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 9.2 vs 0 G3D/$ ($819 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Poor future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
❌566.7% higher power demand at 100W vs 15W.

RadeonT 780M

2024

Why buy it

✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
✅Draws 15W instead of 100W, a 85W reduction.
✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Quadro P4000 (móvel) across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 9.2 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $819 MSRP).

Quadro P4000 (móvel)

2017

RadeonT 780M

2024

Why buy it

✅43.7% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 9.2 vs 0 G3D/$ ($819 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Why buy it

✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
✅Draws 15W instead of 100W, a 85W reduction.
✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Poor future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
❌566.7% higher power demand at 100W vs 15W.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Quadro P4000 (móvel) across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 9.2 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $819 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is Quadro P4000 (móvel) better than RadeonT 780M?

Yes. Quadro P4000 (móvel) is clearly the better overall GPU here. Quadro P4000 (móvel) averages 43.7% more FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. You are also looking at 7,500 vs 7,098 in G3D Mark. On top of that, Quadro P4000 (móvel) is a 2017 card with no meaningful modern upscaling stack, while RadeonT 780M is a 2024 model from an older generation with FSR upscaling. So this is not really a tight same-tier comparison. It is more a modern card against an older, weaker alternative.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

RadeonT 780M is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2024 generation instead of 2017, better upscaling support with FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, and a 4nm process instead of 16nm. That broader feature stack should age better as more games lean on modern upscaling and frame-generation support.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

Quadro P4000 (móvel) is the smarter buy today, but it is not as lopsided as a simple winner label makes it sound. Quadro P4000 (móvel) is priced in an unclear MSRP range at $819 MSRP versus an unclear MSRP, and you are getting 43.7% more estimated average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and 5.7% higher G3D Mark. It also leads G3D-per-dollar by 100+%. RadeonT 780M is the newer 2024 card, so it still has a real case if you care more about newer architecture, lower power draw (15W vs 100W), and future-proofing than about squeezing out the strongest gaming value today.

When does RadeonT 780M make more sense than Quadro P4000 (móvel)?

Yes. RadeonT 780M is still an excellent gaming GPU in 2026: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. It makes more sense if your priority is newer architecture, lower power draw (15W vs 100W), future-proofing, and staying closer to an unclear MSRP more than squeezing out the extra headroom of Quadro P4000 (móvel). The trade-off is that Quadro P4000 (móvel) currently gives you 5.7% higher G3D Mark and 43.7% more estimated average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. It also leads G3D-per-dollar by 100+%.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Quadro P4000 (móvel) Benchmark Check

RadeonT 780M Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Quadro P4000 (móvel)	RadeonT 780M
1080p
low	82 FPS	93 FPS
medium	71 FPS	78 FPS
high	60 FPS	65 FPS
ultra	40 FPS	43 FPS
1440p
low	72 FPS	80 FPS
medium	63 FPS	68 FPS
high	47 FPS	51 FPS
ultra	30 FPS	32 FPS
4K
low	26 FPS	29 FPS
medium	24 FPS	27 FPS
high	17 FPS	18 FPS
ultra	14 FPS	16 FPS

Open Quadro P4000 (móvel)Open RadeonT 780M

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Quadro P4000 (móvel)	RadeonT 780M
1080p
low	212 FPS	96 FPS
medium	181 FPS	67 FPS
high	139 FPS	47 FPS
ultra	111 FPS	32 FPS
1440p
low	160 FPS	67 FPS
medium	134 FPS	45 FPS
high	108 FPS	33 FPS
ultra	85 FPS	23 FPS
4K
low	94 FPS	35 FPS
medium	77 FPS	25 FPS
high	64 FPS	20 FPS
ultra	49 FPS	13 FPS

Open Quadro P4000 (móvel)Open RadeonT 780M

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Quadro P4000 (móvel)	RadeonT 780M
1080p
low	338 FPS	310 FPS
medium	270 FPS	256 FPS
high	225 FPS	206 FPS
ultra	169 FPS	160 FPS
1440p
low	253 FPS	227 FPS
medium	202 FPS	192 FPS
high	169 FPS	157 FPS
ultra	127 FPS	120 FPS
4K
low	169 FPS	137 FPS
medium	135 FPS	123 FPS
high	112 FPS	83 FPS
ultra	84 FPS	59 FPS

Open Quadro P4000 (móvel)Open RadeonT 780M

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Quadro P4000 (móvel)	RadeonT 780M
1080p
low	173 FPS	172 FPS
medium	141 FPS	135 FPS
high	120 FPS	112 FPS
ultra	101 FPS	88 FPS
1440p
low	125 FPS	118 FPS
medium	102 FPS	96 FPS
high	87 FPS	81 FPS
ultra	73 FPS	64 FPS
4K
low	68 FPS	71 FPS
medium	56 FPS	56 FPS
high	43 FPS	44 FPS
ultra	33 FPS	33 FPS

Open Quadro P4000 (móvel)Open RadeonT 780M

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Quadro P4000 (móvel) and RadeonT 780M

Quadro P4000 (móvel)

The Quadro P4000 (móvel) is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 11 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1227 MHz to 1228 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,500 points. Launch price was $819.61.

RadeonT 780M

The RadeonT 780M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 31 2024. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 800 MHz to 2900 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 12 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,098 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the Quadro P4000 (móvel) scores 7,500 versus the RadeonT 780M's 7,098 — the Quadro P4000 (móvel) leads by 5.7%. The Quadro P4000 (móvel) is built on Pascal while the RadeonT 780M uses RDNA 3.0, both on 16 nm vs 4 nm. Shader units: 1,792 (Quadro P4000 (móvel)) vs 768 (RadeonT 780M). Raw compute: 4.398 TFLOPS (Quadro P4000 (móvel)) vs 8.909 TFLOPS (RadeonT 780M). Boost clocks: 1228 MHz vs 2900 MHz.

Feature	Quadro P4000 (móvel)	RadeonT 780M
G3D Mark Score	7,500+6%	7,098
Architecture	Pascal	RDNA 3.0
Process Node	16 nm	4 nm
Shading Units	1792+133%	768
Compute (TFLOPS)	4.398 TFLOPS	8.909 TFLOPS+103%
Boost Clock	1228 MHz	2900 MHz+136%
ROPs	64+100%	32
TMUs	112+133%	48
L1 Cache	672 KB+163%	256 KB
L2 Cache	2 MB	2 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Quadro P4000 (móvel)	RadeonT 780M
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 4 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 256-bit vs 128-bit.

Feature	Quadro P4000 (móvel)	RadeonT 780M
VRAM Capacity	4 GB	4 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Bus Width	256-bit+100%	128-bit
L2 Cache	2 MB	2 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (12_1) (Quadro P4000 (móvel)) vs 12.2 (RadeonT 780M). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 4.

Feature	Quadro P4000 (móvel)	RadeonT 780M
DirectX	12 (12_1)	12.2+2%
Vulkan	1.3	1.3
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	0	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC (6th Gen) (Quadro P4000 (móvel)) vs VCN 4.0 (RadeonT 780M). Decoder: NVDEC (3rd Gen) vs VCN 4.0. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9 (Quadro P4000 (móvel)) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (RadeonT 780M).

Feature	Quadro P4000 (móvel)	RadeonT 780M
Encoder	NVENC (6th Gen)	VCN 4.0
Decoder	NVDEC (3rd Gen)	VCN 4.0
Codecs	H.264,H.265,VP9	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro P4000 (móvel) draws 100W versus the RadeonT 780M's 15W — a 147.8% difference. The RadeonT 780M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro P4000 (móvel)) vs 350W (RadeonT 780M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None. Card length: 0mm vs 0mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots.