G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce RTX 4070

2023

Why buy it

✅+394% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.9 vs 0 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
✅200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 4 GB).
✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌1233.3% higher power demand at 200W vs 15W.

Radeon 760M

2024

Why buy it

✅Draws 15W instead of 200W, a 185W reduction.
✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (5,449 vs 26,919).
❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4070 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 44.9 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $599 MSRP).

GeForce RTX 4070

2023

Radeon 760M

2024

Why buy it

✅+394% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.9 vs 0 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
✅200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 4 GB).
✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Why buy it

✅Draws 15W instead of 200W, a 185W reduction.
✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌1233.3% higher power demand at 200W vs 15W.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (5,449 vs 26,919).
❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4070 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 44.9 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $599 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is GeForce RTX 4070 better than Radeon 760M?

Yes. GeForce RTX 4070 is clearly the better overall GPU here. You are also looking at 26,919 vs 5,449 in G3D Mark. On top of that, GeForce RTX 4070 is a 2023 card with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation, while Radeon 760M is a 2024 model from an older generation with FSR upscaling. So this is not really a tight same-tier comparison. It is more a modern card against an older, weaker alternative.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce RTX 4070 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting 394.0% more raw performance headroom, more VRAM at 12 GB instead of 4 GB, and better frame-generation support with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023) instead of FSR upscaling. That leaves it with more room for heavier textures, tougher ray tracing loads, and higher-end 1440p or 4K gaming over the next few years.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

GeForce RTX 4070 is the smarter buy today, but it is not as lopsided as a simple winner label makes it sound. GeForce RTX 4070 is priced in an unclear MSRP range at $599 MSRP versus an unclear MSRP, and you are getting 394.0% higher G3D Mark. It also leads G3D-per-dollar by 100+%. Radeon 760M is the newer 2024 card, so it still has a real case if you care more about newer architecture and lower power draw (15W vs 200W) than about squeezing out the strongest gaming value today.

When does Radeon 760M make more sense than GeForce RTX 4070?

Yes. Radeon 760M is still an excellent gaming GPU in 2026: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. It makes more sense if your priority is newer architecture, lower power draw (15W vs 200W), and staying closer to an unclear MSRP more than squeezing out the extra headroom of GeForce RTX 4070. The trade-off is that GeForce RTX 4070 currently gives you 394.0% higher G3D Mark. It also leads G3D-per-dollar by 100+%.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce RTX 4070 Benchmark Check

Radeon 760M Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 4070	Radeon 760M
1080p
low	183 FPS	46 FPS
medium	167 FPS	29 FPS
high	151 FPS	21 FPS
ultra	131 FPS	12 FPS
1440p
low	150 FPS	32 FPS
medium	124 FPS	19 FPS
high	110 FPS	11 FPS
ultra	101 FPS	6 FPS
4K
low	92 FPS	12 FPS
medium	78 FPS	8 FPS
high	65 FPS	5 FPS
ultra	58 FPS	3 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4070 Open Radeon 760M

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 4070	Radeon 760M
1080p
low	544 FPS	91 FPS
medium	454 FPS	64 FPS
high	353 FPS	44 FPS
ultra	299 FPS	30 FPS
1440p
low	351 FPS	58 FPS
medium	288 FPS	38 FPS
high	235 FPS	29 FPS
ultra	197 FPS	21 FPS
4K
low	172 FPS	30 FPS
medium	144 FPS	21 FPS
high	125 FPS	17 FPS
ultra	101 FPS	11 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4070 Open Radeon 760M

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	GeForce RTX 4070	Radeon 760M
1080p
low	884 FPS	245 FPS
medium	713 FPS	196 FPS
high	643 FPS	163 FPS
ultra	569 FPS	123 FPS
1440p
low	684 FPS	184 FPS
medium	549 FPS	147 FPS
high	483 FPS	123 FPS
ultra	424 FPS	92 FPS
4K
low	467 FPS	123 FPS
medium	373 FPS	98 FPS
high	326 FPS	77 FPS
ultra	277 FPS	53 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4070 Open Radeon 760M

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	GeForce RTX 4070	Radeon 760M
1080p
low	751 FPS	154 FPS
medium	612 FPS	120 FPS
high	536 FPS	103 FPS
ultra	497 FPS	81 FPS
1440p
low	615 FPS	109 FPS
medium	500 FPS	87 FPS
high	433 FPS	74 FPS
ultra	395 FPS	58 FPS
4K
low	384 FPS	65 FPS
medium	324 FPS	52 FPS
high	301 FPS	42 FPS
ultra	272 FPS	30 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4070 Open Radeon 760M

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4070 and Radeon 760M

GeForce RTX 4070

The GeForce RTX 4070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1920 MHz to 2475 MHz. It has 5888 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 26,919 points. Launch price was $599.

Radeon 760M

The Radeon 760M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 31 2024. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 800 MHz to 2599 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 8 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,449 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4070 scores 26,919 versus the Radeon 760M's 5,449 — the GeForce RTX 4070 leads by 394%. The GeForce RTX 4070 is built on Ada Lovelace while the Radeon 760M uses RDNA 3.0, both on 5 nm vs 4 nm. Shader units: 5,888 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 512 (Radeon 760M). Raw compute: 29.15 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 5.323 TFLOPS (Radeon 760M). Boost clocks: 2475 MHz vs 2599 MHz. Ray tracing: 46 RT cores (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 8 (Radeon 760M) with 184 Tensor cores.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070	Radeon 760M
G3D Mark Score	26,919+394%	5,449
Architecture	Ada Lovelace	RDNA 3.0
Process Node	5 nm	4 nm
Shading Units	5888+1050%	512
Compute (TFLOPS)	29.15 TFLOPS+448%	5.323 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	2475 MHz	2599 MHz+5%
ROPs	64+300%	16
TMUs	184+475%	32
L1 Cache	5.8 MB+4362%	0.13 MB
L2 Cache	36 MB+1700%	2 MB
Ray Tracing Cores	46+475%	8

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4070 is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Radeon 760M lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 4070 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon 760M relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070	Radeon 760M
Upscaling Tech	DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	Yes (DLSS 3.5)	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce RTX 4070 comes with 12 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon 760M has 4 GB. The GeForce RTX 4070 offers 200% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 192-bit vs System. L2 Cache: 36 MB (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 2 MB (Radeon 760M) — the GeForce RTX 4070 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070	Radeon 760M
VRAM Capacity	12 GB+200%	4 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6X	Shared
Memory Bandwidth	504 GB/s	System
Bus Width	192-bit	System
L2 Cache	36 MB+1700%	2 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 12 (12_2) (Radeon 760M). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070	Radeon 760M
DirectX	12.2+2%	12 (12_2)
Vulkan	1.3	1.3
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (2x) (GeForce RTX 4070) vs VCN 4.0 (Radeon 760M). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs VCN 4.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4070) vs H.264,H.265,AV1,VP9 (Radeon 760M).

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070	Radeon 760M
Encoder	8th Gen NVENC (2x)	VCN 4.0
Decoder	5th Gen NVDEC	VCN 4.0
Codecs	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1	H.264,H.265,AV1,VP9

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 4070 draws 200W versus the Radeon 760M's 15W — a 172.1% difference. The Radeon 760M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (GeForce RTX 4070) vs 350W (Radeon 760M). Power connectors: 8-pin vs None. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 80°C.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4070	Radeon 760M
TDP	200W	15W-93%
Recommended PSU	650W	350W-46%
Power Connector	8-pin	None
Length	304mm	—
Height	137mm	—
Slots	3	0-100%
Temp (Load)	80°C	80°C
Perf/Watt	134.6	363.3+170%