
Radeon Vega Frontier Edition
Popular choices:

RTX A3000 Mobile
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Radeon Vega Frontier Edition
2017Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 12.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($999 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than RTX A3000 Mobile across 45 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌328.6% higher power demand at 300W vs 70W.
RTX A3000 Mobile
2021Why buy it
- ✅11.9% more average FPS across 45 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs Unknown).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 70W instead of 300W, a 230W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 12.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
Radeon Vega Frontier Edition
2017RTX A3000 Mobile
2021Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 12.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($999 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Why buy it
- ✅11.9% more average FPS across 45 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs Unknown).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 70W instead of 300W, a 230W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than RTX A3000 Mobile across 45 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌328.6% higher power demand at 300W vs 70W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 12.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is RTX A3000 Mobile better than Radeon Vega Frontier Edition?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon Vega Frontier Edition still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Radeon Vega Frontier Edition | RTX A3000 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 111 FPS | 110 FPS |
| medium | 101 FPS | 93 FPS |
| high | 86 FPS | 78 FPS |
| ultra | 73 FPS | 52 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 98 FPS | 94 FPS |
| medium | 84 FPS | 79 FPS |
| high | 71 FPS | 59 FPS |
| ultra | 62 FPS | 39 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 51 FPS | 39 FPS |
| medium | 46 FPS | 35 FPS |
| high | 37 FPS | 22 FPS |
| ultra | 33 FPS | 18 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Radeon Vega Frontier Edition | RTX A3000 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 331 FPS | 188 FPS |
| medium | 285 FPS | 149 FPS |
| high | 225 FPS | 118 FPS |
| ultra | 179 FPS | 95 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 215 FPS | 129 FPS |
| medium | 185 FPS | 104 FPS |
| high | 158 FPS | 85 FPS |
| ultra | 124 FPS | 67 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 99 FPS | 70 FPS |
| medium | 83 FPS | 56 FPS |
| high | 71 FPS | 47 FPS |
| ultra | 55 FPS | 35 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Radeon Vega Frontier Edition | RTX A3000 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 524 FPS | 572 FPS |
| medium | 450 FPS | 458 FPS |
| high | 381 FPS | 382 FPS |
| ultra | 287 FPS | 286 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 413 FPS | 429 FPS |
| medium | 344 FPS | 343 FPS |
| high | 287 FPS | 286 FPS |
| ultra | 215 FPS | 215 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 258 FPS | 286 FPS |
| medium | 215 FPS | 229 FPS |
| high | 173 FPS | 191 FPS |
| ultra | 135 FPS | 143 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Radeon Vega Frontier Edition | RTX A3000 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 354 FPS | 276 FPS |
| medium | 286 FPS | 241 FPS |
| high | 248 FPS | 196 FPS |
| ultra | 214 FPS | 166 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 271 FPS | 213 FPS |
| medium | 223 FPS | 190 FPS |
| high | 184 FPS | 155 FPS |
| ultra | 159 FPS | 128 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 153 FPS | 129 FPS |
| medium | 136 FPS | 110 FPS |
| high | 119 FPS | 88 FPS |
| ultra | 98 FPS | 70 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Vega Frontier Edition and RTX A3000 Mobile

Radeon Vega Frontier Edition
Radeon Vega Frontier Edition
The Radeon Vega Frontier Edition is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 27 2017. It features the GCN 5.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1382 MHz to 1600 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,753 points. Launch price was $999.

RTX A3000 Mobile
RTX A3000 Mobile
The RTX A3000 Mobile is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 600 MHz to 1230 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 32 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,720 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon Vega Frontier Edition scores 12,753 and the RTX A3000 Mobile reaches 12,720 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Vega Frontier Edition is built on GCN 5.0 while the RTX A3000 Mobile uses Ampere, both on 14 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 4,096 (Radeon Vega Frontier Edition) vs 4,096 (RTX A3000 Mobile). Raw compute: 13.11 TFLOPS (Radeon Vega Frontier Edition) vs 10.08 TFLOPS (RTX A3000 Mobile). Boost clocks: 1600 MHz vs 1230 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon Vega Frontier Edition | RTX A3000 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 12,753 | 12,720 |
| Architecture | GCN 5.0 | Ampere |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 4096 | 4096 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 13.11 TFLOPS+30% | 10.08 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1600 MHz+30% | 1230 MHz |
| ROPs | 64 | 64 |
| TMUs | 256+100% | 128 |
| L1 Cache | 1 MB | 4 MB+300% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 4 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The RTX A3000 Mobile gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon Vega Frontier Edition relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | Radeon Vega Frontier Edition | RTX A3000 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon Vega Frontier Edition comes with 0 MB of VRAM, while the RTX A3000 Mobile has 8 GB. The RTX A3000 Mobile offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: System vs 128-bit.
| Feature | Radeon Vega Frontier Edition | RTX A3000 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | Shared System RAM | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | System | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 4 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (Radeon Vega Frontier Edition) vs 12.2 (RTX A3000 Mobile). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon Vega Frontier Edition | RTX A3000 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.1 | 1.3+18% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 4.0 (Radeon Vega Frontier Edition) vs 7th Gen NVENC (RTX A3000 Mobile). Decoder: UVD 7.0 vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon Vega Frontier Edition) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (RTX A3000 Mobile).
| Feature | Radeon Vega Frontier Edition | RTX A3000 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 4.0 | 7th Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | UVD 7.0 | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon Vega Frontier Edition draws 300W versus the RTX A3000 Mobile's 70W — a 124.3% difference. The RTX A3000 Mobile is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Radeon Vega Frontier Edition) vs 500W (RTX A3000 Mobile). Power connectors: Integrated vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 268mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | Radeon Vega Frontier Edition | RTX A3000 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 300W | 70W-77% |
| Recommended PSU | 1W-100% | 500W |
| Power Connector | Integrated | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 268mm | 0mm |
| Height | 105mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 80°C-6% |
| Perf/Watt | 42.5 | 181.7+328% |
Value Analysis
The RTX A3000 Mobile is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2017).
| Feature | Radeon Vega Frontier Edition | RTX A3000 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $999 | — |
| Codename | Vega 10 | GA104 |
| Release | June 27 2017 | April 12 2021 |
| Ranking | #203 | #205 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












