
Quadro M4000M
Popular choices:

Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Quadro M4000M
2015Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 10.0 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $600 MSRP).
Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS
2022Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 10.0 vs 0 G3D/$ ($600 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Quadro M4000M
2015Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS
2022Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 10.0 vs 0 G3D/$ ($600 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 10.0 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $600 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Quick Answers
So, is Quadro M4000M better than Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS make more sense than Quadro M4000M?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Quadro M4000M | Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 102 FPS | 126 FPS |
| medium | 88 FPS | 113 FPS |
| high | 70 FPS | 98 FPS |
| ultra | 42 FPS | 83 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 89 FPS | 108 FPS |
| medium | 77 FPS | 92 FPS |
| high | 55 FPS | 80 FPS |
| ultra | 32 FPS | 71 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 28 FPS | 58 FPS |
| medium | 26 FPS | 52 FPS |
| high | 17 FPS | 45 FPS |
| ultra | 15 FPS | 40 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Quadro M4000M | Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 210 FPS | 271 FPS |
| medium | 173 FPS | 216 FPS |
| high | 128 FPS | 178 FPS |
| ultra | 96 FPS | 135 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 154 FPS | 179 FPS |
| medium | 123 FPS | 148 FPS |
| high | 96 FPS | 118 FPS |
| ultra | 72 FPS | 95 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 84 FPS | 96 FPS |
| medium | 67 FPS | 79 FPS |
| high | 54 FPS | 67 FPS |
| ultra | 40 FPS | 51 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Quadro M4000M | Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 277 FPS | 271 FPS |
| medium | 221 FPS | 216 FPS |
| high | 184 FPS | 180 FPS |
| ultra | 138 FPS | 135 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 207 FPS | 203 FPS |
| medium | 166 FPS | 162 FPS |
| high | 138 FPS | 135 FPS |
| ultra | 104 FPS | 101 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 138 FPS | 135 FPS |
| medium | 111 FPS | 108 FPS |
| high | 92 FPS | 90 FPS |
| ultra | 69 FPS | 68 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Quadro M4000M | Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 180 FPS | 271 FPS |
| medium | 146 FPS | 216 FPS |
| high | 131 FPS | 180 FPS |
| ultra | 102 FPS | 135 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 128 FPS | 203 FPS |
| medium | 107 FPS | 162 FPS |
| high | 97 FPS | 135 FPS |
| ultra | 74 FPS | 101 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 75 FPS | 129 FPS |
| medium | 58 FPS | 102 FPS |
| high | 48 FPS | 90 FPS |
| ultra | 35 FPS | 68 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro M4000M and Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS

Quadro M4000M
Quadro M4000M
The Quadro M4000M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 18 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 975 MHz to 1013 MHz. It has 1,280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,148 points.


Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS
Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS
The Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 4 2022. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1800 MHz to 2100 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 32 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,012 points.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro M4000M scores 6,148 and the Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS reaches 6,012 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro M4000M is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS uses RDNA 2.0, both on 28 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 1 (Quadro M4000M) vs 2,048 (Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS). Raw compute: 2.496 TFLOPS (Quadro M4000M) vs 8.602 TFLOPS (Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS). Boost clocks: 1013 MHz vs 2100 MHz.
| Feature | Quadro M4000M | Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 6,148+2% | 6,012 |
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | RDNA 2.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 1,280 | 2048+60% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.496 TFLOPS | 8.602 TFLOPS+245% |
| Boost Clock | 1013 MHz | 2100 MHz+107% |
| ROPs | 64 | 64 |
| TMUs | 80 | 128+60% |
| L1 Cache | 480 KB | 512 KB+7% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro M4000M | Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 4 GB of video memory. Bus width: 256-bit vs System.
| Feature | Quadro M4000M | Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | Shared |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | System |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro M4000M draws 100W versus the Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS's 100W — a 0% difference. The Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro M4000M) vs 350W (Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Quadro M4000M | Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 100W | 100W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Slots | 1 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 61.5+2% | 60.1 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2015).
| Feature | Quadro M4000M | Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $600 |
| Codename | GM204 | Navi 23 |
| Release | August 18 2015 | January 4 2022 |
| Ranking | #392 | #135 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














