Quadro M4000M vs Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS

NVIDIA

Quadro M4000M

2015Core: 975 MHzBoost: 1013 MHz

Popular choices:

VS
AMD

Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS

2022Core: 1800 MHzBoost: 2100 MHz

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

Quadro M4000M

2015

Why buy it

  • Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

  • Poor future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 10.0 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $600 MSRP).

Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS

2022

Why buy it

  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 10.0 vs 0 G3D/$ ($600 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • More future proof: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
  • More future proof: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.

Quick Answers

So, is Quadro M4000M better than Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS?
Yes. Quadro M4000M is clearly the better overall GPU here. You are also looking at 6,148 vs 6,012 in G3D Mark. On top of that, Quadro M4000M is a 2015 card with no meaningful modern upscaling stack, while Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS is a 2022 model from an older generation with FSR upscaling. So this is not really a tight same-tier comparison. It is more a modern card against an older, weaker alternative.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2022 generation instead of 2015, better upscaling support with FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, and a 7nm process instead of 28nm. That broader feature stack should age better as more games lean on modern upscaling and frame-generation support.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Quadro M4000M is the smarter buy by a wide margin. Quadro M4000M is priced in an unclear MSRP range at an unclear MSRP versus $600 MSRP, and you are getting 2.3% higher G3D Mark. Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS really only makes sense now as a very cheap stopgap or a used-market placeholder.
When does Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS make more sense than Quadro M4000M?
Yes. Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS is still an excellent gaming GPU in 2026: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. It makes more sense if your priority is newer architecture, future-proofing, and staying closer to $600 MSRP more than squeezing out the extra headroom of Quadro M4000M. The trade-off is that Quadro M4000M currently gives you 2.3% higher G3D Mark. Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS still holds the G3D-per-dollar lead, so the performance win comes with a real value premium.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetQuadro M4000MRadeon Ryzen 7 6800HS
1080p
low102 FPS126 FPS
medium88 FPS113 FPS
high70 FPS98 FPS
ultra42 FPS83 FPS
1440p
low89 FPS108 FPS
medium77 FPS92 FPS
high55 FPS80 FPS
ultra32 FPS71 FPS
4K
low28 FPS58 FPS
medium26 FPS52 FPS
high17 FPS45 FPS
ultra15 FPS40 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetQuadro M4000MRadeon Ryzen 7 6800HS
1080p
low210 FPS271 FPS
medium173 FPS216 FPS
high128 FPS178 FPS
ultra96 FPS135 FPS
1440p
low154 FPS179 FPS
medium123 FPS148 FPS
high96 FPS118 FPS
ultra72 FPS95 FPS
4K
low84 FPS96 FPS
medium67 FPS79 FPS
high54 FPS67 FPS
ultra40 FPS51 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetQuadro M4000MRadeon Ryzen 7 6800HS
1080p
low277 FPS271 FPS
medium221 FPS216 FPS
high184 FPS180 FPS
ultra138 FPS135 FPS
1440p
low207 FPS203 FPS
medium166 FPS162 FPS
high138 FPS135 FPS
ultra104 FPS101 FPS
4K
low138 FPS135 FPS
medium111 FPS108 FPS
high92 FPS90 FPS
ultra69 FPS68 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetQuadro M4000MRadeon Ryzen 7 6800HS
1080p
low180 FPS271 FPS
medium146 FPS216 FPS
high131 FPS180 FPS
ultra102 FPS135 FPS
1440p
low128 FPS203 FPS
medium107 FPS162 FPS
high97 FPS135 FPS
ultra74 FPS101 FPS
4K
low75 FPS129 FPS
medium58 FPS102 FPS
high48 FPS90 FPS
ultra35 FPS68 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Quadro M4000M and Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS

NVIDIA

Quadro M4000M

The Quadro M4000M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 18 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 975 MHz to 1013 MHz. It has 1,280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,148 points.

AMD

Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS

The Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 4 2022. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1800 MHz to 2100 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 32 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,012 points.

Graphics Performance

The Quadro M4000M scores 6,148 and the Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS reaches 6,012 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro M4000M is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS uses RDNA 2.0, both on 28 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 1 (Quadro M4000M) vs 2,048 (Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS). Raw compute: 2.496 TFLOPS (Quadro M4000M) vs 8.602 TFLOPS (Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS). Boost clocks: 1013 MHz vs 2100 MHz.

FeatureQuadro M4000MRadeon Ryzen 7 6800HS
G3D Mark Score
6,148+2%
6,012
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
RDNA 2.0
Process Node
28 nm
7 nm
Shading Units
1,280
2048+60%
Compute (TFLOPS)
2.496 TFLOPS
8.602 TFLOPS+245%
Boost Clock
1013 MHz
2100 MHz+107%
ROPs
64
64
TMUs
80
128+60%
L1 Cache
480 KB
512 KB+7%
L2 Cache
2 MB
2 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureQuadro M4000MRadeon Ryzen 7 6800HS
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 4 GB of video memory. Bus width: 256-bit vs System.

FeatureQuadro M4000MRadeon Ryzen 7 6800HS
VRAM Capacity
4 GB
4 GB
Memory Type
GDDR6
Shared
Bus Width
256-bit
System
L2 Cache
2 MB
2 MB
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro M4000M draws 100W versus the Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS's 100W — a 0% difference. The Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro M4000M) vs 350W (Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureQuadro M4000MRadeon Ryzen 7 6800HS
TDP
100W
100W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Slots
1
Temp (Load)
80°C
Perf/Watt
61.5+2%
60.1
💰

Value Analysis

The Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2015).

FeatureQuadro M4000MRadeon Ryzen 7 6800HS
MSRP
$600
Codename
GM204
Navi 23
Release
August 18 2015
January 4 2022
Ranking
#392
#135