
Radeon Ryzen 5 6600H
Popular choices:

Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Radeon Ryzen 5 6600H
2021Why buy it
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌250% HIGHER MSRP$350 MSRPvs$100 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 9.9 vs 33.9 G3D/$ ($350 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
- ❌340% higher power demand at 132W vs 30W.
Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7
2020Why buy it
- ✅Costs $250 less on MSRP ($100 MSRP vs $350 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 244.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 33.9 vs 9.9 G3D/$ ($100 MSRP vs $350 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 30W instead of 132W, a 102W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 2 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
Radeon Ryzen 5 6600H
2021Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7
2020Why buy it
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $250 less on MSRP ($100 MSRP vs $350 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 244.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 33.9 vs 9.9 G3D/$ ($100 MSRP vs $350 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 30W instead of 132W, a 102W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌250% HIGHER MSRP$350 MSRPvs$100 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 9.9 vs 33.9 G3D/$ ($350 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
- ❌340% higher power demand at 132W vs 30W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 2 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon Ryzen 5 6600H better than Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Radeon Ryzen 5 6600H | Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 154 FPS | 79 FPS |
| medium | 124 FPS | 66 FPS |
| high | 103 FPS | 45 FPS |
| ultra | 78 FPS | 29 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 116 FPS | 63 FPS |
| medium | 93 FPS | 52 FPS |
| high | 78 FPS | 33 FPS |
| ultra | 58 FPS | 20 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 62 FPS | 24 FPS |
| medium | 54 FPS | 22 FPS |
| high | 45 FPS | 13 FPS |
| ultra | 39 FPS | 12 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Radeon Ryzen 5 6600H | Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 155 FPS | 97 FPS |
| medium | 124 FPS | 68 FPS |
| high | 103 FPS | 49 FPS |
| ultra | 78 FPS | 31 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 116 FPS | 53 FPS |
| medium | 93 FPS | 31 FPS |
| high | 78 FPS | 22 FPS |
| ultra | 58 FPS | 16 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 78 FPS | 18 FPS |
| medium | 62 FPS | 11 FPS |
| high | 52 FPS | 9 FPS |
| ultra | 39 FPS | 7 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Radeon Ryzen 5 6600H | Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 155 FPS | 153 FPS |
| medium | 124 FPS | 122 FPS |
| high | 103 FPS | 102 FPS |
| ultra | 78 FPS | 76 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 116 FPS | 114 FPS |
| medium | 93 FPS | 92 FPS |
| high | 78 FPS | 76 FPS |
| ultra | 58 FPS | 57 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 78 FPS | 76 FPS |
| medium | 62 FPS | 61 FPS |
| high | 52 FPS | 51 FPS |
| ultra | 39 FPS | 38 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Radeon Ryzen 5 6600H | Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 155 FPS | 139 FPS |
| medium | 124 FPS | 109 FPS |
| high | 103 FPS | 88 FPS |
| ultra | 78 FPS | 71 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 116 FPS | 104 FPS |
| medium | 93 FPS | 82 FPS |
| high | 78 FPS | 64 FPS |
| ultra | 58 FPS | 51 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 78 FPS | 63 FPS |
| medium | 62 FPS | 49 FPS |
| high | 52 FPS | 40 FPS |
| ultra | 39 FPS | 30 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Ryzen 5 6600H and Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7


Radeon Ryzen 5 6600H
Radeon Ryzen 5 6600H
The Radeon Ryzen 5 6600H is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 13 2021. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1626 MHz to 2491 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 132W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,448 points. Launch price was $329.
Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7
Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7
The Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 is manufactured by an unknown manufacturer. It was released in August 15 2020. It features the Gen. 11 Ice Lake architecture. It has 96 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 10 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,390 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon Ryzen 5 6600H scores 3,448 and the Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 reaches 3,390 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Ryzen 5 6600H is built on RDNA 2.0 while the Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 uses Gen. 11 Ice Lake, both on 7 nm vs 10 nm. Shader units: 1,792 (Radeon Ryzen 5 6600H) vs 96 (Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7).
| Feature | Radeon Ryzen 5 6600H | Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3,448+2% | 3,390 |
| Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | Gen. 11 Ice Lake |
| Process Node | 7 nm | 10 nm |
| Shading Units | 1792+1767% | 96 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon Ryzen 5 6600H | Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 2 GB of video memory. Bus width: System vs 64-bit.
| Feature | Radeon Ryzen 5 6600H | Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | System | 64-bit |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon Ryzen 5 6600H draws 132W versus the Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7's 30W — a 125.9% difference. The Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon Ryzen 5 6600H) vs 350W (Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Radeon Ryzen 5 6600H | Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 132W | 30W-77% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | None | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 0mm |
| Height | — | 0mm |
| Slots | — | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 85 |
| Perf/Watt | 26.1 | 113.0+333% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon Ryzen 5 6600H launched at $350 MSRP, while the Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 launched at $100. The Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 costs 71.4% less ($250 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 9.9 (Radeon Ryzen 5 6600H) vs 33.9 (Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7) — the Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 offers 242.4% better value. The Radeon Ryzen 5 6600H is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2020).
| Feature | Radeon Ryzen 5 6600H | Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $350 | $100-71% |
| Performance per Dollar | 9.9 | 33.9+242% |
| Codename | Navi 23 | Tiger Lake Xe |
| Release | October 13 2021 | August 15 2020 |
| Ranking | #150 | #508 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















