
Radeon Pro 460
Popular choices:

Radeon Ryzen 5 6600H
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Radeon Pro 460
2016Why buy it
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 132W, a 97W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌42.9% HIGHER MSRP$500 MSRPvs$350 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 6.9 vs 9.9 G3D/$ ($500 MSRP vs $350 MSRP).
Radeon Ryzen 5 6600H
2021Why buy it
- ✅Costs $150 less on MSRP ($350 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 42.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 9.9 vs 6.9 G3D/$ ($350 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌277.1% higher power demand at 132W vs 35W.
Radeon Pro 460
2016Radeon Ryzen 5 6600H
2021Why buy it
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 132W, a 97W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $150 less on MSRP ($350 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 42.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 9.9 vs 6.9 G3D/$ ($350 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌42.9% HIGHER MSRP$500 MSRPvs$350 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 6.9 vs 9.9 G3D/$ ($500 MSRP vs $350 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌277.1% higher power demand at 132W vs 35W.
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon Pro 460 better than Radeon Ryzen 5 6600H?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does Radeon Ryzen 5 6600H make more sense than Radeon Pro 460?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Radeon Pro 460 | Radeon Ryzen 5 6600H |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 36 FPS | 154 FPS |
| medium | 22 FPS | 124 FPS |
| high | 15 FPS | 103 FPS |
| ultra | 8 FPS | 78 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 24 FPS | 116 FPS |
| medium | 14 FPS | 93 FPS |
| high | 8 FPS | 78 FPS |
| ultra | 4 FPS | 58 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 9 FPS | 62 FPS |
| medium | 6 FPS | 54 FPS |
| high | 4 FPS | 45 FPS |
| ultra | 3 FPS | 39 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Radeon Pro 460 | Radeon Ryzen 5 6600H |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 73 FPS | 155 FPS |
| medium | 45 FPS | 124 FPS |
| high | 32 FPS | 103 FPS |
| ultra | 19 FPS | 78 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 35 FPS | 116 FPS |
| medium | 23 FPS | 93 FPS |
| high | 16 FPS | 78 FPS |
| ultra | 11 FPS | 58 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 10 FPS | 78 FPS |
| medium | 7 FPS | 62 FPS |
| high | 6 FPS | 52 FPS |
| ultra | 4 FPS | 39 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Radeon Pro 460 | Radeon Ryzen 5 6600H |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 155 FPS | 155 FPS |
| medium | 124 FPS | 124 FPS |
| high | 104 FPS | 103 FPS |
| ultra | 78 FPS | 78 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 117 FPS | 116 FPS |
| medium | 93 FPS | 93 FPS |
| high | 78 FPS | 78 FPS |
| ultra | 58 FPS | 58 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 78 FPS | 78 FPS |
| medium | 62 FPS | 62 FPS |
| high | 52 FPS | 52 FPS |
| ultra | 39 FPS | 39 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Radeon Pro 460 | Radeon Ryzen 5 6600H |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 138 FPS | 155 FPS |
| medium | 107 FPS | 124 FPS |
| high | 87 FPS | 103 FPS |
| ultra | 70 FPS | 78 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 100 FPS | 116 FPS |
| medium | 79 FPS | 93 FPS |
| high | 66 FPS | 78 FPS |
| ultra | 51 FPS | 58 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 59 FPS | 78 FPS |
| medium | 45 FPS | 62 FPS |
| high | 35 FPS | 52 FPS |
| ultra | 25 FPS | 39 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Pro 460 and Radeon Ryzen 5 6600H

Radeon Pro 460
Radeon Pro 460
The Radeon Pro 460 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 30 2016. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 850 MHz to 907 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 35W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,453 points.


Radeon Ryzen 5 6600H
Radeon Ryzen 5 6600H
The Radeon Ryzen 5 6600H is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 13 2021. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1626 MHz to 2491 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 132W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,448 points. Launch price was $329.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon Pro 460 scores 3,453 and the Radeon Ryzen 5 6600H reaches 3,448 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Pro 460 is built on GCN 4.0 while the Radeon Ryzen 5 6600H uses RDNA 2.0, both on 14 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 1,024 (Radeon Pro 460) vs 1,792 (Radeon Ryzen 5 6600H). Raw compute: 1.858 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro 460) vs 8.928 TFLOPS (Radeon Ryzen 5 6600H). Boost clocks: 907 MHz vs 2491 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon Pro 460 | Radeon Ryzen 5 6600H |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3,453 | 3,448 |
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | RDNA 2.0 |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 1024 | 1792+75% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.858 TFLOPS | 8.928 TFLOPS+381% |
| Boost Clock | 907 MHz | 2491 MHz+175% |
| ROPs | 16 | 64+300% |
| TMUs | 64 | 112+75% |
| L1 Cache | 256 KB | 512 KB+100% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 2 MB+100% |
| Frame Generation | FSR upscaling | FSR upscaling + RSR |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon Pro 460 | Radeon Ryzen 5 6600H |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 2 GB of video memory. Bus width: 64-bit vs System. L2 Cache: 1 MB (Radeon Pro 460) vs 2 MB (Radeon Ryzen 5 6600H) — the Radeon Ryzen 5 6600H has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon Pro 460 | Radeon Ryzen 5 6600H |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | Shared |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | System |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 2 MB+100% |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon Pro 460 draws 35W versus the Radeon Ryzen 5 6600H's 132W — a 116.2% difference. The Radeon Pro 460 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon Pro 460) vs 350W (Radeon Ryzen 5 6600H). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None.
| Feature | Radeon Pro 460 | Radeon Ryzen 5 6600H |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 35W-73% | 132W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | None |
| Perf/Watt | 98.7+278% | 26.1 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon Pro 460 launched at $500 MSRP, while the Radeon Ryzen 5 6600H launched at $350. The Radeon Ryzen 5 6600H costs 30% less ($150 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 6.9 (Radeon Pro 460) vs 9.9 (Radeon Ryzen 5 6600H) — the Radeon Ryzen 5 6600H offers 43.5% better value. The Radeon Ryzen 5 6600H is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2016).
| Feature | Radeon Pro 460 | Radeon Ryzen 5 6600H |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $500 | $350-30% |
| Performance per Dollar | 6.9 | 9.9+43% |
| Codename | Baffin | Navi 23 |
| Release | October 30 2016 | October 13 2021 |
| Ranking | #547 | #150 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













