
Radeon R9 295X2
Popular choices:

Radeon RX590 GME
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Radeon R9 295X2
2014Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon RX590 GME across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2014-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌766.5% HIGHER MSRP$1,499 MSRPvs$173 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 5.8 vs 48.3 G3D/$ ($1,499 MSRP vs $173 MSRP).
- ❌185.7% higher power demand at 500W vs 175W.
Radeon RX590 GME
2018Why buy it
- ✅3.4% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $1,326 less on MSRP ($173 MSRP vs $1,499 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 728.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 48.3 vs 5.8 G3D/$ ($173 MSRP vs $1,499 MSRP).
- ✅Less risky long-term buy than Radeon R9 295X2: it remains the more sensible modern option while Radeon R9 295X2 is already legacy-tier future-proofing.
- ✅Draws 175W instead of 500W, a 325W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 8 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
Radeon R9 295X2
2014Radeon RX590 GME
2018Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Why buy it
- ✅3.4% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $1,326 less on MSRP ($173 MSRP vs $1,499 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 728.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 48.3 vs 5.8 G3D/$ ($173 MSRP vs $1,499 MSRP).
- ✅Less risky long-term buy than Radeon R9 295X2: it remains the more sensible modern option while Radeon R9 295X2 is already legacy-tier future-proofing.
- ✅Draws 175W instead of 500W, a 325W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon RX590 GME across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2014-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌766.5% HIGHER MSRP$1,499 MSRPvs$173 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 5.8 vs 48.3 G3D/$ ($1,499 MSRP vs $173 MSRP).
- ❌185.7% higher power demand at 500W vs 175W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 8 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon RX590 GME better than Radeon R9 295X2?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon R9 295X2 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Radeon R9 295X2 | Radeon RX590 GME |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 105 FPS | 139 FPS |
| medium | 89 FPS | 124 FPS |
| high | 73 FPS | 108 FPS |
| ultra | 49 FPS | 93 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 89 FPS | 122 FPS |
| medium | 75 FPS | 100 FPS |
| high | 55 FPS | 84 FPS |
| ultra | 36 FPS | 76 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 36 FPS | 71 FPS |
| medium | 32 FPS | 60 FPS |
| high | 20 FPS | 46 FPS |
| ultra | 17 FPS | 40 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Radeon R9 295X2 | Radeon RX590 GME |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 193 FPS | 209 FPS |
| medium | 169 FPS | 179 FPS |
| high | 141 FPS | 145 FPS |
| ultra | 110 FPS | 115 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 137 FPS | 143 FPS |
| medium | 111 FPS | 118 FPS |
| high | 88 FPS | 97 FPS |
| ultra | 68 FPS | 79 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 63 FPS | 81 FPS |
| medium | 53 FPS | 69 FPS |
| high | 48 FPS | 57 FPS |
| ultra | 39 FPS | 45 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Radeon R9 295X2 | Radeon RX590 GME |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 393 FPS | 376 FPS |
| medium | 314 FPS | 301 FPS |
| high | 262 FPS | 250 FPS |
| ultra | 197 FPS | 188 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 295 FPS | 282 FPS |
| medium | 236 FPS | 225 FPS |
| high | 197 FPS | 188 FPS |
| ultra | 147 FPS | 141 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 197 FPS | 188 FPS |
| medium | 157 FPS | 150 FPS |
| high | 131 FPS | 125 FPS |
| ultra | 98 FPS | 94 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Radeon R9 295X2 | Radeon RX590 GME |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 240 FPS | 376 FPS |
| medium | 207 FPS | 301 FPS |
| high | 168 FPS | 250 FPS |
| ultra | 143 FPS | 188 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 179 FPS | 282 FPS |
| medium | 155 FPS | 225 FPS |
| high | 120 FPS | 188 FPS |
| ultra | 98 FPS | 141 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 103 FPS | 176 FPS |
| medium | 82 FPS | 138 FPS |
| high | 65 FPS | 122 FPS |
| ultra | 50 FPS | 94 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon R9 295X2 and Radeon RX590 GME

Radeon R9 295X2
Radeon R9 295X2
The Radeon R9 295X2 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 29 2014. It features the GCN 2.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1018 MHz. It has 2816 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 500W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8,734 points. Launch price was $1,499.

Radeon RX590 GME
Radeon RX590 GME
The Radeon RX590 GME is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 15 2018. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1469 MHz to 1545 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 175W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8,349 points. Launch price was $279.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon R9 295X2 scores 8,734 and the Radeon RX590 GME reaches 8,349 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R9 295X2 is built on GCN 2.0 while the Radeon RX590 GME uses GCN 4.0, both on 28 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 2,816 (Radeon R9 295X2) vs 2,304 (Radeon RX590 GME). Raw compute: 5.733 TFLOPS ×2 (Radeon R9 295X2) vs 7.119 TFLOPS (Radeon RX590 GME). Boost clocks: 1018 MHz vs 1545 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon R9 295X2 | Radeon RX590 GME |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 8,734+5% | 8,349 |
| Architecture | GCN 2.0 | GCN 4.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 2816 ×2+22% | 2304 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 5.733 TFLOPS ×2 | 7.119 TFLOPS+24% |
| Boost Clock | 1018 MHz | 1545 MHz+52% |
| ROPs | 64 ×2+100% | 32 |
| TMUs | 176 ×2+22% | 144 |
| L1 Cache | 704 KB+22% | 576 KB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 2 MB+100% |
| Frame Generation | FSR upscaling | FSR upscaling |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon R9 295X2 | Radeon RX590 GME |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 8 GB of video memory. Bus width: 512-bit x2 vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (Radeon R9 295X2) vs 2 MB (Radeon RX590 GME) — the Radeon RX590 GME has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon R9 295X2 | Radeon RX590 GME |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 512-bit x2+300% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 2 MB+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.0 (Radeon R9 295X2) vs 12.0 (Radeon RX590 GME). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.3 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 6 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon R9 295X2 | Radeon RX590 GME |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.0 | 12.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.1 | 1.3+18% |
| OpenGL | 4.3 | 4.6+7% |
| Max Displays | 6+50% | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 2.0 (Radeon R9 295X2) vs VCE 3.4 (Radeon RX590 GME). Decoder: UVD 4.2 vs UVD 6.3. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 (Radeon R9 295X2) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Radeon RX590 GME).
| Feature | Radeon R9 295X2 | Radeon RX590 GME |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 2.0 | VCE 3.4 |
| Decoder | UVD 4.2 | UVD 6.3 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon R9 295X2 draws 500W versus the Radeon RX590 GME's 175W — a 96.3% difference. The Radeon RX590 GME is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1000W (Radeon R9 295X2) vs 500W (Radeon RX590 GME). Power connectors: 2x 8-pin vs 8-pin. Card length: 307mm vs 241mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 65°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | Radeon R9 295X2 | Radeon RX590 GME |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 500W | 175W-65% |
| Recommended PSU | 1000W | 500W-50% |
| Power Connector | 2x 8-pin | 8-pin |
| Length | 307mm | 241mm |
| Height | 114mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 65°C-19% | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 17.5 | 47.7+173% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon R9 295X2 launched at $1499 MSRP, while the Radeon RX590 GME launched at $173. The Radeon RX590 GME costs 88.5% less ($1326 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 5.8 (Radeon R9 295X2) vs 48.3 (Radeon RX590 GME) — the Radeon RX590 GME offers 732.8% better value. The Radeon RX590 GME is the newer GPU (2018 vs 2014).
| Feature | Radeon R9 295X2 | Radeon RX590 GME |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1499 | $173-88% |
| Performance per Dollar | 5.8 | 48.3+733% |
| Codename | Vesuvius | Polaris 30 |
| Release | April 29 2014 | November 15 2018 |
| Ranking | #303 | #285 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













